UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule
14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant ☒       Filed by a party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Pursuant to
§240.14a-12
PRA Group, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Not applicable.
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
No fee required.
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules
14a-6(i)(1)
and
0-11.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
OF


LOGO


About PRA GROUP, INC.Group, Inc.

Headquartered in Norfolk, Virginia and incorporated in Delaware, we are a global financial and business services company with operations based primarily in the Americas, Europe and Australia. Our primary business is the purchase, collection and management of portfolios of nonperforming loans. The accounts we purchase are primarily the unpaid obligations of individuals owed to credit originators, which include banks and other types of consumer, retail and auto finance companies. We purchase portfolios of nonperforming loans at a discount in two broad categories: Core and Insolvency. Our Core operation specializes in purchasing and collecting nonperforming loans, which we purchase since the credit originators have chosen not to pursue, or have been unsuccessful in, collecting the full balance owed. Our Insolvency operation consists primarily of purchasing and collecting on nonperforming loans where the customer is involved in a bankruptcy proceeding, or the equivalent thereof, in certain European countries. We also provide fee-based services on class action claims recoveries in the United States (“U.S.”). For more information about our business, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 (“2023 Form 10-K”) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 29, 2024. The information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website, including any document referenced in this Proxy Statement, is not, and shall not be deemed to be, a part of this Proxy Statement.



LOGO

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

 DATE:Thursday, June 13, 2024
 TIME:9:30 a.m. Eastern Time
 LOCATION: 
Virtual Meeting Information
Date: RECORD DATE:May 13, 2016
Time:12:00 noon Eastern Time
Place:PRA Group, Inc.
 Building III
2nd Floor
130 Corporate Boulevard
Norfolk, VA 23502April 23, 2024

Dear Fellow Stockholders:
We are pleased to invite you to the

The PRA Group, Inc. (the “Company”) 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) will be held virtually on MayThursday, June 13, 20162024, beginning at our Corporate Headquarters located at 130 Corporate Boulevard, Norfolk, Virginia 23502 at 12:00 noon9:30 a.m. Eastern Time. We look forwardInstructions on how to your attendance ataccess and participate in the meetingAnnual Meeting are provided under “Instructions for Attending and we encourage you to complete, sign and dateParticipating in the Virtual Annual Meeting” on page 2 of the enclosed proxy card to vote your shares or vote your shares on the Internet or by telephone, whether or not you are planning to attend. Following a report on PRA Group, Inc.’s business results,Proxy Statement. Only stockholders will vote:

To elect the nominees named in the accompanying proxy statement to the Board of Directors for the coming year;
To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers; and
To ratify the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016.
Stockholders also will transact any other business that may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
Stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 17, 2016April 23, 2024 are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at,during, the Annual Meeting. Included

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to vote on the following items:

Election of the 11 director nominees named in the accompanying Proxy Statement for a one-year term;

Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2024;

Approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (“Say-on-Pay”); and

Any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

We are providing access to our proxy materials by internet in theseaccordance with the SEC’s “notice and access” rules. These rules permit us to provide access to our proxy materials, areincluding the proxy statement; the Company’s 2015Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and our 2023 Annual Report to Stockholders, which includesby notifying you of their availability on the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015; this Noticeinternet instead of the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting; and your proxy card. These materials are first being mailed to stockholdersmailing printed copies. Accordingly, on or about April 1, 2016,29, 2024, we will mail to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will provide instructions on how to access and arereview our proxy materials on the internet and request printed copies. Stockholders will not receive printed copies of our proxy materials unless they request such copies. If requested, printed copies will be available online atfree of charge. We believe that providing our proxy materials through the Company’s website at www.pragroup.com.

internet increases the ability of our stockholders to access the information they need while simultaneously reducing the environmental impact and cost to the Company of the Annual Meeting.

Every stockholder’s vote is important and valued by the Company. We hope that you will find our proxy statement to be easy to follow, and that it will aid in your ability to designate your proxy vote.

Once again,Therefore, we thank you for your commitment to the Company and urgeencourage you to vote your shares now.
through the internet, by phone or, if you requested and received a printed copy of the proxy card, by mail, using the instructions provided below even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

LaTisha Owens Tarrant

Corporate Secretary

April 29, 2024

YOU CAN VOTE IN ONE OF FOUR WAYS

LOGO

  
Steven D. FredricksonVisit www.AALvote.com/PRAA to vote VIA THE INTERNET  Judith S. Scott
Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerLOGO

  Corporate SecretaryIf you received printed proxy materials, sign, date and Counselreturn your proxy card in the envelope provided to vote BY MAIL
LOGO

Call (866) 804-9616 to vote BY TELEPHONELOGO

Attend the Annual Meeting virtually and vote via the link provided.

Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 13, 2024: The Company’s Proxy Statement and 2023 Annual Report to stockholders are available at
www.viewproxy.com/PRAGroup/2024.


April 1, 2016


Notice

PRA Group, Inc.

2024 Proxy Statement

Table of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|i


Contents

PROXY SUMMARY

i

Annual Meeting

i

Q&A with our Lead Director

How would you evaluate PRA Group’s performance in 2015?
PRA has always focused on creating long-term stockholder value and it remains a priority for both the Board of Directors and for PRA Management. In 2015, PRA had a good year in several key areas that I believe will add value over the long term. For example, debt buying, excluding acquisitions, was at an all-time high in 2015 and we saw continued growth in cash collections across the globe. In addition, our growth in international investments, both through new market entry and through significant portfolio purchases, should position us well for the future. None of us are pleased with the recent stock price performance, but we remain focused on producing long-term results that will be recognized by our investors.
David N. Roberts,
Lead Director
What’s the biggest change you have seen at PRA during your tenure on the Board?
The biggest change is just how much PRA Group has grown. But even with all of this growth, the core values of building long-term stockholder value, ensuring a focus on quality control and compliance, and increasing productivity remain the same. We have simply found new ways to grow by leveraging those competencies – whether through establishing the Insolvency business or our purchase of Aktiv Kapital. Each of these decisions has delivered growth, but in a way that hasn’t changed who PRA is and has been from the beginning.
What would you say the Board’s most significant priorities over the past year have been?
We’ve really had two primary priorities over the past year. The first is our ongoing focus on compliance. With the regulatory environment getting more and more complex, we remain committed to PRA being the industry standard as we partner with regulators, sellers, and consumers alike. The second priority has been seeking ways to best leverage the skillset of the Company. We added several new directors to our Board of Directors this year, each of whom adds value in helping us determine how we should continue to manage the Company for the long term. These individuals bring experience across our industry with large-scale operations, international focus, and/or industry expertise that we believe will help us continue on the right path for the future. I don’t see any reason why this would change in 2016.
You have significantly increased the number of directors in 2015 and 2016. How can stockholders be confident that our Board is composed of the right directors with the right skill sets to effectively represent our interests?
We made a commitment in 2015 to increase the size of our Board of Directors, but only to the extent that those new directors could add supplemental value and diversity to our existing Board. As a part of this, we found two exceptional, independent directors in Vikram “Vik” Atal and Lance Weaver. Both of these individuals come from very large, global organizations, have robust industry experience and are already having an impact on the Company. We also added two more directors who were natural additions based on their continuing contributions to the Company. First, Kevin Stevenson, who as a co-founder of PRA and an integral part of the leadership team, provides the Board with additional insight into strategic and operational challenges and opportunities that face PRA. Second, Geir Olsen adds substantial value through his continued guidance on international expansion and perspective on the European market. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee goes through an extensive process each year to identify ways to enhance the makeup and diversity in our Board of Directors. We believe with the addition of these four directors, we accomplished that goal in 2015 and that stockholders will benefit from these additions in 2016 and beyond.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|ii

Table of Contents

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|iii


Table of Contents

Compensation Committee Report
2015 Summary Compensation Table
2015 Grants of Plan Based Awards
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
Post-Employment Compensation Arrangements
Proposal 3: Ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Report of the Audit Committee
Voting Instructions and Information
Communication with Directors
Submission of Stockholder Proposals

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|iv

Proxy Summary

Proxy Summary

This summary highlights certain information contained elsewhere in the proxy statement. ThisProxy Statement but does not contain all of the information that you should consider andprior to casting your vote. Therefore, you should read the entire proxy statementProxy Statement carefully before voting.

Annual Meeting

Date and Time:Thursday, June 13, 2024, at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time
Location:Virtual Meeting
Proxy Statement
The 2016 Proxy Statement (“Proxy Statement”) is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of PRA Group, Inc. (which, together with its subsidiaries, we refer to as “PRA”, the "Company”, “we”, or “us”) in connection with the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) scheduled for May 13, 2016, at 12:00 noon Eastern Time at PRA’s Corporate Headquarters located at 130 Corporate Boulevard, Building III 2nd Floor, Norfolk, Virginia 23502. These proxy materials are first being furnished to stockholders on or about April 1, 2016.
Record Date:
  
Our Business
PRA is a specialized financial and business services company. We are a market leader in the consumer debt purchase and collection industry. The Company also provides a broad range of fee-based services including revenue enhancement for local governments; vehicle location, skip-tracing and collateral recovery for auto lenders, governments, and law enforcement; contingent consumer debt recovery on behalf of banks, credit providers, and debt purchasers; and filing of class action claims on behalf of institutional investors, manufacturers, and retailers. PRA was founded in 1996 and has been public since 2002. We are distinguished by our strong customer focus, continuous innovation, expansive data and analytics, and culture of integrity and compliance. We have approximately 3,800 employees in the United States, Canada and throughout Europe. For more information about our businesses, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2016.
Investor Outreach and Engagement
PRA regularly communicates with its investors to better understand their perspectives. Throughout the year, our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), President, and Director Investor Relations and sometimes other subject-matter experts within the Company engaged with our investors to remain well-informed regarding their perspective on current issues, as well as to address any questions or concerns. These individuals serve as liaisons between stockholders, members of senior management and the Board.
In 2015, we engaged with our stockholders on a regular basis to discuss a range of topics. We recognize the value of taking our investors views into account, and engagement with them helps us understand their opinions, concerns or other matters.
Investor outreach efforts included non-deal road shows, conferences, onsite visits and phone calls. We also communicate with investors and other stakeholders through other avenues, including our annual report and SEC filings, proxy statement, news releases and our website. We hold conference calls for our quarterly earnings releases, which are open to all. These calls and other corporate events are also generally available in real time and as archived webcasts on our website.
Ongoing Focus on Compliance
PRA is dedicated to meeting our compliance obligations and we strive to be the most compliant collections operation in the industry. We believe this enhances the overall customer experience, improves customer service and increases customer satisfaction.
The PRA Compliance Function is led by an independent Chief Compliance Officer who reports to both the CEO and the Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors. PRA’s Compliance Program establishes a risk-based approach and oversight framework to manage compliance risk and ensure compliance with laws and regulations governing PRA’s activities across the globe. The Compliance Program is structured to proactively identify, control, measure, monitor and report compliance risks throughout the Company. The Board of Directors and senior management oversee PRA’s Compliance Management Program, which includes policies and procedures, training, monitoring and a consumer complaint response system. Moreover, PRA has established an Internal Audit function that is responsible for conducting independent reviews of our compliance with consumer protection laws and regulations and adherence to internal policies and procedure.
April 23, 2024

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Voting Matters and 2016 Proxy Statement|1



Board Vote Recommendations

Proxy Summary

VOTING MATTERS AND VOTE RECOMMENDATIONS
Proposal 1: Election of Directors (page 6)
    
The

Agenda Item

Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believe that the six director nominees possess the necessary qualifications to provide effective oversight of the business and quality advice and counsel to the Company's management.Vote
 Recommendation 

Page
  Reference  

    

Proposal 1: 

  Elect the 11 director nominees named in this Proxy Statement for a one-year term
  Director NomineeFORDirector SincePrincipal OccupationExperience/QualificationsOur Board's Recommendation
 John H. Fain2010Retired President and CEO of Metro Information Services, Inc.High Level of Financial Literacy, Leadership & Board Experience, Experience with Complex Organizations, Entrepreneurial SpiritFOR
David N. Roberts2002
CEO of AG
Mortgage Investment Trust,
Inc.
High Level of Financial Literacy, Leadership & Board Experience, Financial Industry ExperienceFOR
Vikram A. Atal2015President, Atal Advisors, LLCHigh Level of Financial Literacy, Risk Oversight, Leadership & Board Experience, Financial Industry Experience, Experience with Complex Organizations, International/Global ExperienceFOR
Geir L. Olsen2016Partner, Ubon PartnersLeadership & Board Experience, Financial Industry Experience, Entrepreneurial Spirit, International/Global ExperienceFOR
Kevin P. Stevenson2015President, Chief Administrative Officer, Interim CFO of PRA Group, Inc.High Level of Financial Literacy, Leadership & Board Experience, Financial Industry Experience, Experience with Complex Organizations, Entrepreneurial Spirit, International/Global ExperienceFOR
Lance L. Weaver2015Retired President, Virgin Money CardsHigh Level of Financial Literacy, Risk Oversight, Leadership & Board Experience, Financial Industry Experience, Government & Regulatory Experience, Experience with Complex Organizations, Entrepreneurial Spirit, International/Global ExperienceFOR11
    

Proposal 2: 

  Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2024FOR18

Proposal 2: 3: 

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (page 25)FOR
The Company seeks a non-binding advisory vote from its stockholders to approve our named executive officer (“NEO”) compensation (“Say-on-Pay”)FOR22

Corporate Governance Highlights

Independent Oversight

•  Our Board of Directors (“Board”) is comprised primarily of independent (11 of 12) directors.

•  Our Board Committees are comprised solely of independent directors.

•  We have a Lead Independent Director who, among other responsibilities, presides over executive sessions of our independent directors, which occur at each in-person or virtual Board meeting.

•  The roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) are separate.

•  Our Compensation Committee engages an independent compensation of its Named Executive Officers as described inconsultant to advise and support the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section beginning on page 26. The Board values stockholders' opinions and the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the advisory vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.

Committee’s work.

  
Proposal 3: Ratification

Board

Refreshment

•  Our Board and all Board Committees conduct annual performance evaluations.

•  Our directors cannot stand for re-election after they reach the age of 75.

Stockholder

Rights and Alignment

•  Our stockholders have the right to call special meetings.

•  Our directors are elected annually.

•  Our directors must be elected by a majority of the Appointmentvotes cast in uncontested elections.

•  We have stock ownership guidelines that apply to our directors and executive officers in order to align their interests with the interests of KPMG as Independent Auditors (page52)

FORour stockholders.

•  All incentive compensation for our executive officers is subject to recoupment (or clawback) by the Company in the event of an accounting restatement, to comply with applicable law or if the executive officer violates restrictive covenants included in the officer’s equity award or employment agreement.

The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of KPMG to serve as the independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. As a matter of good corporate governance, stockholders are being asked to ratify the Audit Committee's selection of the independent auditors. 
Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”)

•  Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees significant ESG matters with the support of management’s ESG Steering Committee, which is comprised of senior members of management and operates pursuant to a written charter.

•  We have adopted a Statement on Human Rights.

•  We have adopted a Political Contributions Statement.

•  We have adopted an Environmental and Sustainability Statement.

Hedging/Pledging 

•  Our directors, executive officers and employees are prohibited from engaging in short sales and hedging transactions involving the Company’s equity securities and may not pledge our common stock.

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group i


Director Dashboard

We are led by directors whose qualifications, experience and backgrounds support the effective oversight of our business and affairs, further our strategic goals and provide valued guidance to management. The charts below reflect key data about our Board as of April 29, 2024.

LOGO

Board Diversity Matrix (As of April 29, 2024)

  

Total Number of Directors

   12 
     
  

 

  Female   Male   Non-Binary   Did Not
Disclose
Gender
 
  

Part I: Gender Identity

   

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

     

Directors

   3    9    0    0 
  

Part II: Demographic Background

   

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

     

African American or Black

   1    0    0    0 
     

Alaskan Native or Native American

   0    0    0    0 
     

Asian

   0    1    0    0 
     

Hispanic or Latinx

   1    0    0    0 
     

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

   0    0    0    0 
     

White

   1    8    0    0 
     

Two or More Races or Ethnicities

   0    0    0    0 
   

LGBTQ+

   

 

 

 

 

 

   1    

 

 

 

 

 

Did Not Disclose Demographic Background

   

 

 

 

 

 

   0    

 

 

 

 

 

2023 Company Performance Highlights

Total portfolio purchases were $1.2 billion in 2023 compared to $850.0 million in 2022. The increase was primarily driven by improving portfolio supply in the U.S.

Total cash collections (collections on our owned finance receivables portfolios) remained stable at $1.7 billion for both 2023, and 2022.

Total revenues were $802.6 million in 2023 compared to $966.5 million in 2022. The decrease was driven by:

a $140 million decrease in changes in expected recoveries, primarily due to lower overperformance and a net increase to the estimated remaining collections of certain pools compared to a net decrease during 2023; and

a $15 million decrease in portfolio income, largely the result of higher levels of consumer liquidity driving a lower supply of nonperforming loan portfolios in the years leading up to 2023.

Total operating expenses were $702.1 million in 2023 compared to $680.7 million in 2022. The increase was driven by:

a $12 million increase in legal collection costs, primarily reflecting higher volumes of lawsuits filed in the U.S. during 2023;

ii PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


an $11 million increase in agency fees, due to higher collections in Brazil; and

$20 million of non-recurring expenses, including severance, case-specific litigation, and the impairment of real estate associated with the closing of an owned U.S. call center.

Net income/(loss) attributable to the Company was ($83.5) million in 2023, compared to $117.1 million in 2022.

Our cash efficiency ratio (cash receipts, which are cash collections plus fee income, less operating expenses, divided by cash receipts) was 58.0% in 2023 compared to 61.0% in 2022.

Estimated remaining collections (the sum of all future projected cash collections on our owned finance receivables portfolios) was $6.4 billion at the end of 2023, compared to $5.7 billion at the end of 2022.

2023 TOTAL PORTFOLIO

PURCHASES

$1.2B

2023 TOTAL CASH

COLLECTIONS

$1.7B

2023 TOTAL REVENUES

$802.6M

Portfolio Purchases ($ in millions)

LOGO

Cash Collections ($ in millions)

LOGO

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group iii


Estimated Remaining Collections ($ in billions)

LOGO

Investor Outreach and Engagement

We interact with our investors in a variety of ways. Our Investor Relations team meets regularly with stockholders, prospective stockholders, and investment analysts. These meetings often include participation by our CEO, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), and other business leaders, and focus on topics such as how we deliver growth and profitability as well as drive our strategy. In addition to these meetings, our management also engages routinely with our stockholders and other stakeholders. We value input from our stockholders and communicate regularly with them to better understand their perspectives, address any questions or concerns, and help increase their understanding of our business. Throughout 2023, we contacted many of our stockholders, including our top 50 stockholders, conducted more than 70 unique meetings and engaged with holders of more than 35% of our shares outstanding. These discussions generally focused on the Company’s business strategy, market positioning, financial performance and other relevant governance and non-governance matters. We also communicate with our stockholders through other avenues, including our SEC filings, news releases, investor conferences, non-deal roadshows, annual report, annual meeting, annual proxy statement, ESG report, and investor relations website. In addition, we hold quarterly conference calls, which are open to the public, to discuss our financial results.

2023 STOCKHOLDER MEETINGS

70+

2023 % OF SHARES ENGAGED

>35%

2023 INVESTOR CONFERENCES AND NON-DEAL ROADSHOWS

7


iv PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


LOGO

120 CORPORATE BOULEVARD

NORFOLK, VIRGINIA 23502

Proxy Statement

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

June 13, 2024

Purpose

This Proxy Statement is being made available to stockholders on or about April 29, 2024 in connection with a solicitation by the Board of PRA Group, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) of proxies to be voted at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) and any adjournments or postponements. The Annual Meeting will be held virtually on Thursday, June 13, 2024 at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|2



Proxy Summary

COMPANY PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS
PRA had another yearStockholders.

Record Date

At the close of business on April 23, 2024, which is the record performance levels with regards to Cash Receipts, Revenue and Estimated Remaining Collections (ERC), while falling three cents short of last year’s Earnings Per Share (EPS).


Notice ofdate for the Annual Meeting (the “Record Date”), there were 39,352,006 shares of Stockholdersour common stock outstanding and 2016 Proxy Statement|3


Proxy Summary

COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS
Our consistent strong performance is reflected inentitled to vote at the compensation that our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) earned in 2015, as described inAnnual Meeting.

Quorum

In order for business to be conducted at the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) in this Proxy Statement.In light of the favorable results of the 2015 advisory vote to approve the Company’s executive compensation*, the Company continued its existing compensation practices without substantial changes in 2015. At the Company’s 2015 Annual Meeting, of Stockholders, 98.1% of stockholder votes cast approved, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation program for the Company’s NEOs.

2015 Compensation
2015 Compensation Summary
Compensation ComponentSteven D. FredricksonKevin P. StevensonMichael J. PetitNeal Stern
Geir L. Olsen(1)
Salary$903,846$522,450$440,962$403,925$493,556
Bonus Awarded$1,250,000$900,250$600,000$820,834$362,581
Equity Granted$2,099,879$879,940$699,854$474,904$699,854
Total 2015 Compensation$4,253,725$2,302,640$1,740,816$1,699,663$1,555,991
(1)
Mr. Olsen’s base pay and bonus were converted from Euros as of December 31, 2015 for illustrative purposes only. The exchange rate used was €1:$1.0906.
The compensation of our NEOs further reflects both our 2015 performance and our compensation philosophy. Consistent with our executive compensation philosophy, a significant portion of both our CEO’s and other NEOs’ total compensation is incentive-based and at risk, as illustrated in the following graphs:
*In this proxy, when we refer to “executive compensation” we mean primarily the Compensation Committee’s decisions regarding all elements of pay for Messrs. Stevenson, Petit, Stern and Olsen, who together with Mr. Fredrickson, are our NEOs during 2015.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|4


Proxy Summary

The following illustrates the three-year directional relationship between the Company’s Net Operating Income (NOI) performance and the total direct compensation (TDC) of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO).

(1)
Mr. Fredrickson also received a retention grant of restricted stock units in 2014 with a fair market value of $1,000,000 when he executed his employment agreement. This grant is not included in TDC, as it is a one-time grant and not considered part of annual compensation for comparison purposes.


Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|5


Proposal 1: Election of Directors

Our business endeavors are managed under the direction of our Board of Directors, which currently consists of eleven members. Eight of our directors, representing greater than a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of our Board, are independent as required by the independent director rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”). Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes of directors and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regularly reclassifies new directors in ordercommon stock entitled to ensure that any increase or decrease in the number of directors will be more evenly distributed among the three classes, so that each class will consist of approximately one-third of the total number of directors. Each director serves a three-year term. One class of directors is eligible for election at each annual meeting of stockholders. Nominees for director that receive the affirmative votes of a plurality of sharesvote, represented and voting in person or by proxy, must be present. Abstentions and broker shares that include “broker non-votes” that are present and entitled to vote are counted as present for purposes of determining a quorum. See “Broker Non-Votes” on page 51 of this Proxy Statement for an explanation of what constitutes a broker non-vote.

Vote Required

Each stockholder will have one vote for each share of our common stock held as of the Record Date. Shares of our common stock represented by properly executed proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the choices indicated on the proxy.

If you provide specific voting instructions, your shares will be elected.voted as you instruct. If you vote through the internet or by phone and vote as recommended by our Board or if you sign and return your proxy card, but do not provide instructions, your shares will be voted as follows:

FOR the election of the 11 nominees for directors named in this Proxy Statement for a one-year term (“Proposal 1”);

FOR the ratification of the appointment of EY as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2024 (“Proposal 2”); and

FOR the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of our NEOs (“Proposal 3”).

With respect to Proposal 1, each director nominee will be elected if the director nominee receives a majority of the votes cast. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will therefore have no effect on Proposal 1. Proposal 2 and Proposal 3 will be approved if a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter, vote in favor of the applicable proposal. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” Proposal 2 and Proposal 3. However, broker non-votes will have no effect on these proposals.

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 1


Instructions for Attending and Participating in the Virtual Annual Meeting

The NominatingAnnual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting. There will be no physical meeting location. However, stockholders will have the same rights and Corporate Governance Committee recommendedopportunities to participate in the Boardvirtual Annual Meeting as they would at an in-person meeting.

The Annual Meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, June 13, 2024. In order to attend and participate in the candidates for electionAnnual Meeting, including voting your shares and re-election whosubmitting questions, you must register at www.viewproxy.com/PRAGroup/2024 by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 12, 2024. If you are a record holder, you must register using the virtual control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or on your proxy card (if you requested and received a printed copy of the ballot forproxy materials). If you hold your shares beneficially through a bank, broker or other nominee, and your voting instruction form or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials indicates that you may vote those shares, then you may access, participate in and vote at the Annual Meeting with the control number indicated on that voting instruction form or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. Otherwise, you must provide a legal proxy from your bank, broker or other nominee during registration and you will be assigned a virtual control number in order to vote your shares and submit questions during and before the Annual Meeting. Any nominee for director who receivesIf you are unable to obtain a greater numberlegal proxy to vote your shares, you will still be able to attend the Annual Meeting (but will not be able to vote your shares or submit questions) so long as you demonstrate proof of votes withheld fromstock ownership. Instructions on how to connect and participate via the internet, including how to demonstrate proof of stock ownership, are posted at www.viewproxy.com/PRAGroup/2024.

On the day of the Annual Meeting, if you have properly registered, you may enter the Annual Meeting by logging in using the password you received via email in your registration confirmation. We encourage you to check in by 9:15 a.m. Eastern Time on June 13, 2024, the day of the Annual Meeting, so that any technical difficulties may be addressed before the Annual Meeting. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the Annual Meeting live webcast during the meeting, please email VirtualMeeting@viewproxy.com or against hiscall (866) 612-8937.

Even if you plan to attend the live webcast of the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote in advance via the internet, by telephone or her election than votes for his or her election shall tender his or her resignation for consideration by mail so that your vote will be counted in the Nominating and event you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting.

2 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Corporate Governance Committee.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will then considerprimary responsibility of our Board is to exercise its business judgment while acting in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders. Our Board is responsible for establishing broad corporate policies, setting strategic direction and overseeing management, which is responsible for the daily operations of the Company. Our Board must fulfill its responsibilities consistent with its fiduciary duties to the Company and our stockholders and will recommendin compliance with applicable laws and regulations. To assist our Board with fulfilling its duties, our Board has implemented a leadership structure that supports its oversight responsibilities, created standing and ad hoc committees to formally handle duties that our Board deems significant, and adopted policies and procedures that reflect our Board’s commitment to good corporate governance, including Corporate Governance Guidelines, a Code of Conduct and a policy to approve transactions with related parties.

Board Leadership

Our Board believes that the decision of whether to have the same individual occupy the offices of Chairman of the Board (“Chairman”) and CEO should be made by our Board, from time to time, in its business judgment after considering relevant factors, including the specific needs of the Company and what is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

Currently, the roles of Chairman and CEO are separated, which our Board believes is appropriate. Separation of the roles allows Mr. Atal to focus on managing the daily operations of the Company in his role as President and CEO, while Mr. Fredrickson, in his role as Chairman, oversees our Board’s significant functions. Mr. Fredrickson has leveraged his extensive experience in the financial sector and past daily operational management experience to effectively and efficiently guide our Board by focusing its attention on issues of greatest importance to the fullCompany and our stockholders.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a Lead Independent Director will be selected by the independent directors whenever the individual selected to serve as Chairman is also the CEO or otherwise not independent. Although Mr. Fredrickson is independent, the Board what action should be takenhas retained the Lead Independent Director role given expanded Board leadership responsibilities with respect to board refreshment, new director onboarding, investor engagement and strategic planning. Lance L. Weaver currently serves as the tendered resignation.

Lead Independent Director and has the following duties and responsibilities:

All nominees have consented to serve as director if elected/reelected. We have no reason to believe that any

preside at all meetings of the nominees will independent directors;

consult with the Chairman and CEO concerning the agenda for Board meetings and approve the agenda for Board meetings;

be unable or unwillingavailable to advise Committee chairs in fulfilling their designated roles and responsibilities with our Board;

be available for good cause to serve. However, if any nominee should become unable for any reason or unwilling for good cause to serve, proxies may be voted for another person nominated as a substitute byconsultation and direct communication with stockholders where appropriate, upon reasonable request; and

lead the Board or the Board may reduce the number of directors. If the Board nominates a substitute, the shares represented by all valid proxies will be voted for that nominee.

The Company did not receive any recommendations of potential director candidates from stockholders for consideration at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|6


Proposal 1: Election of Directors

The following table sets forth the names, ages, the membership for eachannual evaluation of the standing committeesChairman and CEO.

Building Our Board

Our Board recognizes that the duties and responsibilities of the Board, and certain other information as of March 17, 2016 for each of the nominees for election as a director and for each of the continuing members of the Board of Directors.

Director Nominee/ Continuing DirectorClassAgeDirector SinceCurrent Term ExpiresAudit CommitteeCompensation CommitteeCompliance CommitteeNominating & Corporate Governance Committee
2016 Director Nominees - Seeking Reelection        
John H. Fain26720102016MemberMember  
David N. Roberts25320022016 Chair Member
2016 Director Nominees -New Directors        
Vikram A. AtalTBD6020152016Member   
Geir L. OlsenTBD4620162016    
Kevin P. StevensonTBD5220152016    
Lance L. WeaverTBD6120152016 Member  
Continuing Directors        
Steven D. Fredrickson15620022018    
Penelope W. Kyle16720052018  MemberChair
James A. Nussle35520132017  ChairMember
Scott M. Tabakin35720042017Chair Member 
James M. Voss37320022017MemberMember  
Number of Meetings in 2015    11664
DIRECTOR DASHBOARD

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|7


Proposal 1: Election of Directors

DIRECTOR NOMINEES – TERMS EXPIRING IN 2016
Mr. Fain has more than 25 years of business management experience, including service as the co-founder, President and Chief Executive Officer of Metro Information Services, Inc. (“Metro”). Metro was an information technology consulting services firm that went public in 1997, and subsequently merged with Keane, Inc. in 2001. Prior to co-founding Metro, Mr. Fain developed and ran his own independent data processing consulting practice, servicing clients in multiple states. Mr. Fain has been retired since Dec 31, 2002, and serves on the Investment Committee of the Hampton Roads Community Foundation and the Endowment Committee of the Virginia Beach Aquarium and Marine Science Center Foundation. Mr. Fain was appointed to the Board because of his insight with respect to the use of information technology strategies in large companies, his operational and financial expertise and his experience as a chief executive officer and director of a sizeable public company.
John H. Fain
Independent
Retired President and Chief
Executive Officer of Metro
Information Services, Inc.
Director Since 2010
Mr. Roberts joined Angelo, Gordon & Co., a registered investment advisor, in 1993. Mr. Roberts helped to start and grow a number of the firm’s businesses, including opportunistic real estate, private equity and net lease real estate, and RMBS. Currently he is the Chief Executive Officer of the firm’s publicly traded REIT, AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. Mr. Roberts, through his role at Angelo, Gordon & Co., helped to guide the Company through its transition from a small private company to a major, publicly-traded company. Prior to joining Angelo, Gordon & Co., Mr. Roberts was a principal at Gordon Investment Corporation, a Canadian merchant bank, from 1989 to 1993, where he participated in a wide variety of transactions. Prior to that, he worked in the Corporate Finance Department at L.F. Rothschild where he specialized in mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Roberts' qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive knowledge of the Company and his financial expertise in business development, operations and strategic planning. Mr. Roberts has a deep understanding of the industries in which the Company does business.
David N. Roberts
Independent
Chief Executive Officer of AG
Mortgage Investment Trust,
Inc.
Director Since 2002

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|8


Proposal 1: Election of Directors

DIRECTOR NOMINEES – NEW DIRECTORS SEEKING ELECTION IN 2016
Mr. Atal formed Atal Advisers, LLC in February 2013 concurrent with his departure from Citigroup. Mr. Atal served in executive roles with Citigroup, Inc. for 27 years. From 2008 to 2013, he was an executive vice president for Citigroup's global consumer bank, where he had responsibility for shaping Citi as an information-centric enterprise, leveraging analytics and data to drive growth, and oversaw loss mitigation efforts against Citi's high-risk consumer portfolio through the financial crisis. From 2005 to 2008, he served as chairman and Chief Executive Officer for Citi Cards' branded and retail partner cards franchise in North America, which had revenues of $18 billion and more than 60 million customers. His previous roles with Citigroup included leadership of partnership programs for Citi Cards, Chief Financial Officer of Citi's U.S. cards franchise, and overseeing SEC, regulatory and business financial reporting for Citicorp. Mr. Atal holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in mathematics from St. Stephen's College in Delhi, India, and a Bachelor of Science degree in finance from the London School of Economics and Political Science. Mr. Atal’s experiences as a CFO in the Financial Services industry along with his significant international experience working for complex, publicly traded organizations make him a strong, well-qualified addition to the Board of Directors.
Vikram A. Atal
Independent
President, Atal Advisers, LLC
Director Since 2015
Mr. Olsen was the Chief Executive Officer and board member of Aktiv Kapital, AS, a leading European consumer debt purchaser, prior to its acquisition by PRA Group, Inc. in 2014. Post-acquisition he served as the CEO of PRA Group Europe until January 2016. Under Mr. Olsen’s leadership the two companies were integrated, and PRA Group’s European market position was significantly strengthened. Prior to Aktiv Kapital, Mr. Olsen held various leadership roles in sales, marketing and strategy with Cisco Systems and Tandberg, a Norwegian company that Cisco acquired in 2010. He also advised financial services and technology companies as a consultant at McKinsey & Company for five years prior to joining Tandberg. Currently Mr. Olsen is a partner at Ubon Partners, an investment company focused on early stage companies in technology and financial services that he cofounded in 2013. He previously served on the board of Acano Ltd, a technology company based in the U.K., prior to its acquisition by Cisco. Mr. Olsen was appointed to the board due to his deep understanding of the European debt purchase markets as well as his experience in using technology to transform businesses.
Geir L. Olsen
Former Executive Officer
Partner, Ubon Partners
Director Since 2016

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|9


Proposal 1: Election of Directors

DIRECTOR NOMINEES – NEW DIRECTORS SEEKING ELECTION IN 2016
Mr. Stevenson co-founded PRA in 1996. In 2015, he was appointed President, Chief Administrative Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer. Prior to this, he was PRA’s Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary. Before founding PRA, he was controller and department manager of financial control and operations support at Household Recovery Services (“HRSC”) from 1994 to 1996. Prior to joining HRSC, he was controller of Household Bank's regional processing center in Worthington, Ohio, where he also managed the collections, technology, research and ATM departments. While at Household Bank, he participated in numerous bank and branch acquisitions as well as divestitures. Kevin is a Certified Public Accountant and received his bachelor’s degree in Accounting from the Ohio State University. He currently serves on the boards of the American Red Cross of Southeastern Virginia and EQUI-KIDS Therapeutic Riding Program of Virginia Beach. Mr. Stevenson was appointed to the PRA board because of his deep company and industry knowledge and strong financial acumen.
Kevin P. Stevenson
Executive Officer
President, Chief
Administrative Officer, and
Interim CFO of PRA
Group, Inc.
Director Since 2015
Mr. Weaver is an accomplished consumer financial services executive with nearly 40 years of experience across the consumer lending, mortgage and credit card asset classes. He has served as an advisor to financial services companies including VISA, Citigroup, Total System Services and Apollo Capital, and was President, Money Cards for Virgin Money Holdings in the U.K. from 2013 to 2015. Before holding these positions, he was president of EMEA Card Services for Bank of America, with approximately $30 billion in assets across Europe, Canada and China. He had previously served on the senior management team of MBNA Corporation for 15 years, where he helped build MBNA into the largest independent credit card lender in the world when it was acquired by Bank of America in 2006. His prior experience includes executive leadership roles with Citigroup, Wells Fargo and Maryland National Bank. Mr. Weaver earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in marketing from Georgetown University. He is a past member of the Georgetown University board of directors and board of trustees, and a past board chair of MasterCard. Mr. Weaver’s international experiences in the Financial Services industry along with his experience working for complex, highly regulated, publicly traded organizations make him a strong, well-qualified addition to the Board of Directors.
Lance L. Weaver
Independent
Retired President, Virgin
Money Cards
Director Since 2015

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|10


Directors Continuing in Office


DIRECTORS CONTINUING IN OFFICE – TERMS EXPIRING IN 2017
Mr. Tabakin is an executive-level consultant, advising boards and management teams on strategy, capital raising, capital structures and exit strategies. He was a certified public accountant and has more than 30 years of public-company experience. Previously, Mr. Tabakin was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ValueOptions, Inc., then the nation’s largest independent, privately owned behavioral health and wellness company from December 2011 to December 2013. Mr. Tabakin also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Bravo Health, Inc., a privately owned managed health care company, from July 2006 until the sale of the company in November 2010. Prior to that, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AMERIGROUP Corporation, then a publicly traded (NYSE) managed health care company. From October 1992 until May 2001, Mr. Tabakin was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Beverly Enterprises, Inc., then the nation's largest publicly traded (NYSE) provider of long-term health care. From June 1980 until October 1992, Mr. Tabakin worked for the accounting firm of Ernst & Young. Mr. Tabakin holds a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from the University of Illinois. He also serves on the boards of the University of Maryland Medical System Health Plans and Living Life Solutions. These experiences, including his tenure as the chief senior financial officer of two large publicly traded companies, provide Mr. Tabakin with a comprehensive understanding of the complex financial and legal issues facing public companies and were all factors in our conclusion that Mr. Tabakin made and continues to make strong contributions to the Company through his service on our Board.
Scott M. Tabakin
Independent
Independent Consultant
and Advisor
Director Since 2004
Mr. Voss, who has more than forty years of experience as a senior finance executive, currently serves as an independent financial consultant. From 1992 through 1998, he was with First Midwest Bank as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer. Prior to that, he served in a variety of senior executive roles during a twenty-four year career with Continental Bank of Chicago, and was Chief Financial Officer at Allied Products Corporation, a publicly traded (NYSE) diversified manufacturer. Mr. Voss has both a bachelor’s degree and an MBA from Northwestern University. Mr. Voss's combination of expertise in the areas of business and finance enables him to provide unique insight and perspective to our Board and to address complex financial issues, which may be presented to our Board. Mr. Voss also served on the Board of AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. from 2011 to 2014.
James M. Voss
Independent
Independent Financial Consultant
Director Since 2002
Mr. Nussle currently serves as President and CEO of The Credit Union National Association, since September 2014. Mr. Nussle also serves as an independent director of the Thrivent Financial Mutual Funds and is an industry advisor to a private equity firm, Avista Capital Partners. Mr. Nussle previously served as the President of Growth Energy, a renewable energy industry association based in Washington D.C from 2010 to 2013. Prior to his private sector career, Mr. Nussle had extensive service in government at both the local and federal levels. He served eight terms as a U.S. Representative from Iowa between 1991 and 2007; was elected by his colleagues to serve three terms as the House Budget Committee Chairman; and was selected by President George W. Bush in 2007 to serve in his Cabinet as the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and serve on a number of the President’s policy councils including the National Economic, Homeland Security, and National Security Councils. Mr. Nussle also served four years as an elected prosecuting attorney in Iowa and practiced law in Iowa. Mr. Nussle has a bachelor’s degree from Luther College and a juris doctorate from Drake Law School. In addition to his industry experience, Mr. Nussle’s legal background along with his experiences with regulators makes him a strong contributor to the Company through his service to both our Board and to the committees on which he participates.
James A. Nussle
Independent
President and CEO of The
Credit Union National
Association
Director Since 2013

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|11


Directors Continuing in Office

DIRECTORS CONTINUING IN OFFICE – TERMS EXPIRING IN 2018
Mr. Fredrickson is Chairman and CEO of PRA Group, Inc., which he co-founded with Mr. Stevenson in 1996. Previously, Mr. Fredrickson served as Chairman, President and CEO of PRA from 2002 to 2015. Mr. Fredrickson has more than 30-years of experience in financial services including leadership roles at Household Recovery Services’ (“HRSC”) Portfolio Services Group and Household Commercial Financial Services. Prior to joining HRSC, Mr. Fredrickson specialized in corporate and real estate workouts at Continental Bank of Chicago. Mr. Fredrickson has an MBA from the University of Illinois and a bachelor’s degree from the University of Denver. In addition, Mr. Fredrickson is very active in the community serving as a member of the board of directors for the United Way of South Hampton Roads and the St. Mary’s Home Foundation. He is also on the executive advisory council of the College of Business and Public Administration at Old Dominion University and a Trustee of the EVMS Foundation.
Steven D. Fredrickson
Executive Officer
Chairman and CEO of PRA
Group, Inc.
Director Since 2002
Ms. Kyle is currently the President of Radford University. Prior to her appointment as President of Radford in June 2005, she had served since 1994 as Director of the Virginia Lottery under three Virginia governors. Earlier in her career, Ms. Kyle was an attorney with the law firm McGuire Woods in Richmond, Virginia. She was later employed at CSX Corporation, where during a 13-year career she became the company's first female officer and a vice president in the finance department. Ms. Kyle has a bachelor’s degree from Guilford College, an MBA from the College of William and Mary, and has completed post-graduate work at Southern Methodist University. She also has her juris doctorate from the University of Virginia. Ms. Kyle also has prior service as a director and chair of the audit committee of a publicly traded company. Ms. Kyle brings a unique and valuable perspective to our Board based on her distinctive background in law, business, academia and government, particularly with respect to matters relating to law and corporate governance.
Penelope W. Kyle
Independent
President, Radford
University
Director Since 2005

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|12


Corporate Governance


BUILDING THE PRA BOARD
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes the task of building a board of directors for PRA seriously. The responsibility of service as a director requiresrequire highly skilled individuals with variousdiverse qualities, skills,backgrounds, attributes and professional experience. The Board believes that there are general requirements for service on the Board that are applicable to all directors and that there are other skills and experiences that should be represented on the Board as a whole, but not necessarily by each director. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews potential candidates for director vacancies and recommends nominees to the Board for approval. The Committee may retain, from time to time, a third-party search firm to assist in identifying potential candidates.
TheOur Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consider the qualifications of directors and director candidates individually and in the broader context of theour Board’s overall composition and the Company’s current and future needs. They then requireThe Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews potential candidates for director vacancies and recommends nominees to our Board for approval. In identifying potential candidates for Board membership, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee relies on suggestions and recommendations from directors, stockholders, management and others, including executive search and board advisory firms when deemed appropriate. During 2023, the Board engaged a third-party search firm to conduct a director search. The search firm identified candidates and also considered candidates recommended by directors and a stockholder. Mr. Marino and Ms. Gadhia were recommended to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee as part of this director search process launched in 2023 and conducted by the third-party search firm. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not distinguish between nominees recommended by stockholders and other nominees.

Stockholders wishing to suggest candidates to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for consideration as directors may submit a written notice to our Corporate Secretary following the procedures set forth in our Amended and Restated By-Laws (“By-Laws”), as described under “Stockholder Proposals” on page 51 of this Proxy Statement.

Our Board and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee have determined that each director be recognized as a person of there are general requirements for service on our Board that all directors must possess, including the following:

high integrity and ethical standards, committedstandards;

commitment to representing the long-term interests of stockholders and possessing stockholders;

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 3


Corporate Governance

a proven record of success in his or her field. Each director must also have a familiarity withthe individual’s field;

an understanding of, and respect for, good corporate governance requirementspractices;

a high degree of financial literacy;

experience leading complex organizations;

the ability to devote the time necessary to properly discharge the duties associated with serving as a director, including attending and practicesparticipating in Board and Committee meetings;

intangible qualities such as well as willingness to ask difficult questions while continuing to work collegially with other directors and management; and

an appreciation for diversity and inclusion.

While theour Board does not have a specific diversity and inclusion policy, it does consider self-identified diversity ofcharacteristics, including race, ethnicity, gender, age, cultural background and professional experiences in evaluating candidates for Board membership.

Director Qualifications

In addition all directors should have sufficient time to properly discharge the duties associated with serving as acharacteristics each director and to attend and participate in Board and committee meetings. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also prefers that director candidates have intangible qualities including the ability to ask difficult questions while continuing to work collegially with the other directors and members of management.

Qualifications, Experiences, Knowledge, Skills and Abilities to be Represented on the Board
Themust possess, our Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee have identified certainthe following qualifications, experiences,experience, knowledge, skills and abilities that are important to be represented on theour Board as a whole, in light of the Company’s current needs and business priorities. The list below represents the qualifications and experiences that should be represented on the Board:
The Board also reviewed the knowledge, skills and abilities that they believe would be essential for a director. Below are the knowledge, skills and abilities that were identified as being essential for all directors.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|13


priorities:

Desired Skills and
 Experience

Our Board as a whole should:

Corporate Governance

Summary of Qualifications of Board of Directors
The table below includes the specific qualifications and experiences of each director that led the Board to conclude that the director is qualified to serve on the Board. While we look to each director to be knowledgeable in these areas, a “ü” in the chart below indicates that the item is a specific qualification or experience that the director brings to the Board. The absence of a “ü” for a particular item does not mean that the director does not possess that qualification or experience.
QualificationAtalFainFredricksonKyleNussleOlsenRobertsStevensonTabakinVossWeaver
High Level of Financial Literacyüüü  

Financial Industry

  üüüüüunderstand the complex financial and highly regulated environment in which our business operates in order to evaluate our operating and strategic performance.
Risk Oversightü  

Government and Regulatory

have experience in compliance with international, federal and state laws, regulations and agencies because our business is heavily regulated and directly affected by governmental and regulatory actions.
  

Information Technology, Data Governance and Cybersecurity

have experience with information technology because our business relies on data and information technology and we face threats of business or technology disruptions and/or cyber incidents.
  üüü
Leadership & Board Experienceüüüüüüüüüüü
Financial Industry Experienceü

International/Global

  ühave a global perspective and international experience useful in evaluating our operating and strategic performance and growth because our business and strategy are global.
  
üüü

Public Company

  üühave a comprehensive understanding of the complex financial and legal issues facing U.S. public companies because we are a publicly-traded company regulated by the SEC and listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”).
Government & Regulatory Experience  
üü

Risk Oversight

  have a comprehensive understanding of the risks facing our business and industry and the policies and procedures that are appropriate for effective risk oversight and mitigation.

Strategic Planning

  üü
Experience with Complex Organizationsüüüüüüüü
Entrepreneurial Spiritüüüüüüü
International/Global Experienceüüüüüüühave experience setting a long-term corporate vision, assessing geographies in which to operate, and evaluating competitive positioning and a comprehensive understanding of transformation planning processes to support the development of, and modifications to, our strategic plan.
Director Orientation, Education and Preparation

Board Committees

The Company conducts a formal orientation program for all new directors, which includes a one-on-one meeting with each of our principal executives as well as the provision of extensive written material about the Company, its operating units and departments, and the industries in which the Company and its subsidiaries operate. Senior management reports and meetings with directors involve operating performance overviews, strategic plans and significant financial, accounting, compliance and risk management issues, as well as the Company’s succession plans. Directors visit the Company's departments and subsidiaries in order to gain additional knowledge about their operations. Further, all directors participate as a group in ongoing continuing education through director education sessions that are held on a regular Board meeting date at least once per year. The Company also affords directors the opportunity and funds to attend additional external director education programs. Management ensures that the Board is fully informed about the Company's business by providing regular written financial reports, reports of operations, compliance reports and updates and other relevant reports at Board meetings at least quarterly, as well as between meetings and at committee meetings. Board materials related to agenda items are provided a sufficient time in advance of Board meetings to allow the directors time to prepare for meaningful discussion. All Board members also receive comprehensive quarterly financial reports and budget briefings from the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). Members of senior management attend regular Board meetings, or portions thereof, for the purpose of participating in discussions and providing management reports on business unit operations and operational developments and risks. Directors also have access to members of management and employees of the Company between meetings and, as necessary and appropriate, may consult with and engage, at the Company's expense, independent legal, compensation, financial and accounting advisors to assist them in performing their duties to the Company and its stockholders.



Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|14


Corporate Governance

BOARD GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct and Ethics
Our Board and management are committed to strong ethical conduct, corporate governance and sound business practices. We have a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which satisfies the requirements for a “code of ethics” under the United States Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and covers the membersstanding Committees of our Board our officers, including our CEO, our President,are the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and our employees. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics addresses, among other items, conflicts of interest; confidentiality; fair dealing; protection and use of corporate assets; compliance with laws and the reporting of illegal, fraudulent, or unethical behavior. We will disclose amendments to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as well as any waivers thereof, on our website, www.pragroup.com, to the extent permissible by the rules and regulations of the SEC and the NASDAQ. There were no waivers of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics granted in 2015.
Our Corporate Governance GuidelinesCommittee and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics are postedRisk Committee. Each standing Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, which is available on the Investor Relations page of our website www.pragroup.com along with copiesat www.pragroup.com. All members of the charters forstanding Committees are independent as defined by Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules. In addition, each member of the Compensation Committee is a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and each member of the Audit Committee Compensationis an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the Exchange Act. Each standing Committee Compliance Committee and Nominating and has the ability to retain, at the Company’s expense, special legal, accounting or other consultants or advisors it deems necessary in the performance of its duties. Additional information concerning the standing Committees as of April 1, 2024 is included in the following chart.

4 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Corporate Governance Committees. Please note that the website does not constitute a part of this Proxy Statement. These materials are also available in print to any stockholder who makes a request to the Corporate Secretary at 140 Corporate Boulevard, Norfolk, Virginia 23502, Attention: Corporate Secretary. The Board regularly reviews committee charters and major corporate governance developments and modifies its governance principles, committee charters and key practices as warranted. Additionally, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee ensures that assessments of each of the committees and the Board itself are conducted. This process enhances director, committee, and Board effectiveness. At the conclusion of the Board and committee assessments, the Board uses the information obtained to evaluate and refine its processes and committee charters, as necessary.

Audit

Director Attendance

Members:

Marjorie M. Connelly, Chair

John H. Fain

Brett L. Paschke

Scott M. Tabakin

Primary Roles and Responsibilities:

  monitors and reviews the integrity of the Company’s financial reports and monitors and provides oversight of the Company’s systems of internal controls regarding accounting and financial reporting;

  engages and monitors the independence and performance of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm;

  monitors the independence and performance of the Company’s internal auditors; and

  provides an avenue of communication between the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, management, the internal audit department and our Board.

Number of meetings held in 2023: 11

Compensation

Members:

Brett L. Paschke, Chair

Danielle M. Brown

John H. Fain

James A. Nussle

Primary Roles and Responsibilities:

  develops and oversees the implementation of the Company’s compensation philosophy with respect to its directors, CEO, other NEOs and other executive officers;

  determines compensation for the Company’s executive officers;

  oversees the design of the Company’s compensation program, consistent with the Company’s compensation philosophy, internal equity considerations and market practice;

  considers compliance with applicable laws and regulations that have an impact on the Company’s business when making compensation decisions to encourage the highest standards of integrity and ethical conduct; and

  reviews compensation programs and policies for features that may encourage excessive risk taking and determine the extent to which there may be a connection between compensation and risk.

Number of meetings held in 2023: 9

Nominating and Corporate Governance

Members:

Lance L. Weaver, Chair

James A. Nussle

Peggy P. Turner

Geir L. Olsen

Primary Roles and Responsibilities:

  develops and recommends to our Board a set of effective corporate governance policies and procedures applicable to the Company;

  identifies individuals qualified to become Board members and recommends that our Board select a group of director nominees for each annual meeting of our stockholders;

  oversees annual evaluation of our Board;

  reviews periodically the Company’s Related Party Transaction Policy, makes recommendations to our Board concerning changes and approves transactions;

  considers candidates recommended by stockholders in accordance with our By-Laws and Certificate of Incorporation using the same criteria in evaluating candidates nominated by a stockholder as it does for candidates recommended by our Board or management; and

  oversees significant ESG matters.

Number of meetings held in 2023: 6

Risk

Members:

Scott M. Tabakin, Chair

Danielle M. Brown

Marjorie M. Connelly

Peggy P. Turner

Glenn P. Marino

Primary Roles and Responsibilities:

  oversees the Company’s enterprise risk management program, including its governance structure, risk management framework and policies and procedures;

  reviews and approves our business continuity management program;

  receives reports and presentations from management on significant risks facing the Company and the results of any risk management reviews and assessments, including the following risks: operations, compliance, underwriting, strategy, legal, reputation, information security, technology and data management, and vendor management; and

  reviews material reports or inquiries from government or regulatory agencies related to any significant enterprise risks.

Number of meetings held in 2023: 5

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 5


During 2015, the Board held twenty-three meetings: five regular meetings and eighteen special meetings. The majority of the Board attended 100% of the regular meetings of the Board

Corporate Governance

Board’s Role in 2015. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and committees on which he or she served during 2015. All directors are encouraged, but not required, to attend our Annual Meeting of Stockholders. With the exception of Mr. Nussle, all of our directors attended the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Director Independence
The Board currently consists of eleven directors, two of whom are employed by the Company (Steven D. Fredrickson, Chairman of the Board and CEO, and Kevin P. Stevenson, President, Chief Administrative Officer, and Interim CFO). The Board has established guidelines, which conform to the independence requirements of the NASDAQ listing standards to assist it in determining director independence. In February 2016, each director completed a directors' and officers' questionnaire in accordance with current proxy disclosure requirements. These included updated information concerning their qualifications and experience, as well as any conflicts of interest, job changes, and any material transactions, material relationships, and other arrangements between the Company and the directors or immediate family members of the directors. Based on the responses received, it was determined that other than Mr. Olsen, who recently retired as CEO of PRA Europe, the remaining non-employee directors of the Company lack material relationships with the Company, and are independent directors under applicable securities law requirements and NASDAQ rules.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|15


Corporate Governance

This determination was made based upon a number of facts indicating that, other than Mr. Olsen, none of our other non-employee directors has a direct or indirect material relationship with the Company, including, but not limited to, the following:
Except for Steven D. Fredrickson, Chairman of the Board and CEO, Kevin P. Stevenson, President, Chief Administrative Officer, and Interim CFO, and Geir L. Olsen, former CEO, PRA Europe, no director is, or has ever been, an executive officer of the Company or employed by the Company or its subsidiaries, or has an immediate family member who is an officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or has any current or past material relationships with the Company;
No director, other than Messrs. Fredrickson, Stevenson and Olsen have ever received any compensation from, worked for, been retained by, or received anything of substantial value from the Company, other than director compensation;
No director or any member of any director's immediate family is, or ever was, employed by the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, or ever worked on the Company's audit at any time;
No NEO serves on the board of directors of any company that employs one of our directors or any member of the immediate family of any of our directors; no NEO sits on a board of directors of any company at which one of our directors is the chief executive officer or chief operating officer, and none of our directors nor any members of the immediate family of any of our directors has been an executive officer of any entity having a compensation committee on which one or more of the Company’s executive officers has concurrently served;
None of the independent directors, their respective affiliates or members of their immediate family, directly or indirectly, has engaged in any transaction with the Company or its affiliates or has any relationship with the Company or its affiliates which, in the judgment of the Board, is inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent;
No director and no immediate family member of any director is a partner or controlling stockholder, director or executive officer of any entity from which the Company purchases goods or services, or to which the Company makes charitable contributions in excess of 5% of the entity's consolidated gross revenues for that year, or $200,000, whichever is greater; and
There are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers of the Company.
Board Leadership
The structure of our Board leadership consists of a Chairman (who is also our CEO), strong independent committee chairs and a Lead Independent Director, who is elected solely by the independent directors, and whom we refer to as our Lead Director. Risk Oversight

Our Board believes that the current Board leadership structure, in which the roles of Chairman and CEO are held by one person, is best for the Company and its stockholders at this time. As Chairman and CEO, Mr. Fredrickson is able to utilize the in-depth focus and perspective gained in running the Company to effectively and efficiently guide our directors by focusing their attention on issues of greatest importance to the Company and its stockholders, while also working closely with Mr. Roberts, the Lead Director. However, the Board does review the appropriateness of this structure on a regular basis.Our Lead Director coordinates the activities of the other independent directors to ensure strong independent oversight of management; facilitates information flow and communication by acting as a liaison between the directors and management; chairs all meetings of the Board during executive session; and is authorized to call meetings of the independent directors and retain any outside advisors and consultants who report directly to the Board.

Independent Director Meetings
The Board believes that strong, independent Board leadership is a critical aspect of effective corporate governance; therefore, independent directors meet at least quarterly in executive session without management present, as part of each regularly scheduled Board meeting. The Lead Director acts as chairman of these sessions, at which the independent directors have the opportunity to frankly discuss management’s performance.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|16


Corporate Governance

Board Risk Oversight
The Board, as a whole and through its committees, is responsible for overseeing PRA’s risk profile and management’s processes for assessing and managing risk, and management is responsible for day-to-day risk management. The Board recognizes that the Company faces a broad range of risks, including financial, regulatory, operational, political, reputational, governance, legal and legal,cyber, that may affect the Company'sCompany’s ability to execute corporate strategies and fulfill business objectives. TheOur Board operates within a climate of transparencyhas delegated to its Risk Committee responsibility for overseeing the Company’s risk profile and uninhibited dialogue with seniormanagement’s processes for assessing and managing risk, while management is responsible for daily risk management. Consistent with this approach, senior managementOur Chief Risk and Compliance Officer attends the regularall meetings of the Risk Committee and meets in executive session with the Risk Committee at each of its meetings.

Our Board and routinely reports on their activities and presents quarterly risk management reports to the Audit Committee. These reports include risk considerations and discussions concerning actions and strategies for monitoring, managing and mitigating any risks identified. The Board meets regularly to discuss the strategic direction of the Company; a consideration of key risks is essential to the Company's strategic planning process. The Company’s Compliance Department documents known risks, assesses the sufficiency of risk identification, and recommends the appropriate manner in which to control or mitigate those risks.

Certain important categories of risk arehas also assigned to committeesits remaining Committees responsibility for reviewing, evaluating and making recommendations concerning important risk categories that review, evaluate and receive management reports on risk. These includefall within their scope of responsibility, including the following:

The Audit Committee receives quarterly risk management updates from the Company'sour CFO and the Company's external auditorsindependent registered public accounting firm on financial risks, compliance with reporting requirements and internal controls. The Audit Committee also receivescontrols regarding accounting and financial reporting; quarterly reports from the Company’s Senior Vice President, Chief Audit Executive - Corporate Audit Services, who oversees the Company’s internal audit department, on the results of internal audit testing;activities; and any reports related to complaints and allegations of fraud or illegal acts regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters and any submissions by employees, including those submitted confidentially and/or anonymously, regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.

The Compensation Committee takes measures to preventdesigns the Company'sCompany’s compensation programs and incentives from leadingin a manner that does not encourage employees, including our NEOs, to decisions that encouragetake unnecessary or promote excessive risk-taking.risks. The Compensation Committee, with assistance from Frederic W. CookPearl Meyer & Co.Partners, LLP (“FW Cook”Pearl Meyer”), the Compensation Committee’s current independent compensation consultant, has reviewed the Company’s compensation policies and practices for all employees, including our NEOs, as they relate to risk management practices and risk-taking incentives, and has determined that there are no risks arising from these policies and practices that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company;Company.

Management’s role in assisting our Board with its risk oversight responsibility is critical. In order to support our Board’s risk oversight role, the Company has a Risk Assessment and Action Committee (“RAAC”), which reviews, evaluates and reports on the processes used to identify, assess and manage risk throughout the Company. The Compliance Committee oversees mattersRAAC is comprised of non-financial compliance, significant legal or regulatory compliance exposurethe Company’s executive officers and material reports or inquiries from government or regulatory agencies;is chaired by our Chief Risk and

The Chief Compliance Officer, regularly attends executive sessions with the Board of Directors on matters of compliance.
Policies for Approval of Related Person Transactions
The Company requires disclosure of any relationships and transactions in which the Company, its directors, its executive officers or their immediate family members are participants, and conducts a review of transactions of the Company with any stockholders owning five percent (5%) or more of the Company's outstanding common stock, to determine whether there are any such transactions in amounts at or exceeding the minimum threshold for disclosure in this Proxy Statement under the relevant SEC rules (generally, transactions involving amounts exceeding $120,000) in which a related person has a direct or indirect material interest. The Company's General Counsel is primarily responsible for developing and implementing the policy and procedures relativewho reports to the reviewRisk Committee at each of its meetings.

Members of senior management routinely attend Board meetings and approvalreport on their activities, including significant risks. These reports include risk considerations and discussions concerning actions and strategies for monitoring, managing and mitigating any risks identified. In addition, the Company’s Compliance Department, which reports to our Chief Risk and Compliance Officer, documents known compliance risks, assesses the sufficiency of related party transactions. The complete detailsrisk identification, and recommends risk management and mitigation strategies.

Board’s Role in ESG

Our Board recognizes the importance of any proposed transaction must be presentedESG to the Company's General Counsel by the party intending to enter into the transaction. The Company's General Counsel will make an initial materiality determination, and when appropriate, will prepareour overall strategic plan. As a written analysis and recommendationresult, our Board has delegated to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee based on: (i) the natureoversight of the proposed transaction; (ii) the related person’s interest in the transaction; (iii) the dollar value of the transaction; (iv) the importance of the transaction to the business of the Company; (v) the material terms of the transaction;our significant ESG and (vi) the overall fairness of the transaction to the Company. Based on the foregoing factors,sustainability practices, policies and activities. To support the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, will decide whetherwe have formed an ESG Steering Committee, which is comprised of senior members of management. The ESG Steering Committee supports our Board’s ESG oversight role by developing and making recommendations regarding our overall strategy with respect to recommend thatESG matters, recommending reporting standards and advising on communications with stakeholders, including our employees and investors. The ESG Steering Committee also oversees the proposed transaction be brought beforeESG Working Group, which consists of employees across the full Board for consideration.


Notice of Annual Meeting of StockholdersCompany whose daily responsibilities involve ESG matters and 2016 Proxy Statement|17


Corporate Governance

If the matter is presentedwho support our ESG disclosures by collecting and providing relevant data to the ESG Steering Committee.

6 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Corporate Governance

Under our ESG governance structure, which is illustrated below, we have adopted a Human Rights Statement, Political Contribution Statement and Environmental and Sustainability Statement, publish an annual ESG Review and have incorporated ESG in our enterprise risk management program.

LOGO

Board’s Role in Management Succession Planning

Our Board oversees management succession with a critical focus on succession for the CEO given the importance of the role an its direct reporting to the Board. As outlined in our Corporate Governance Guidelines the Board maintains and approves a vote,succession plan for the CEO that includes a plan for emergencies and a related partythe death, disability, termination, retirement or resignation of the CEO. Our CEO succession plan is involvedtriggered whenever the CEO is unable to perform the CEO’s duties, in which case an emergency meeting of the transaction, he or she will notBoard is called. During the emergency meeting, the Board determines whether the individual identified as an emergency successor should be allowed to participate in any discussions and decisions concerningappointed as CEO based on the transaction.nature of the event that prompted the meeting. If the Board approvesdetermines that the transaction, the Company's General Counsel will ensureevent is not temporary or that a written arm's length contract between the partiesit is appropriately executed by all parties. The Company discloses all such transactions that are determined to be directlynot necessary or indirectly material to a related person. No such transactions are currently being considered.

The standing committees ofin the Company’s Board includebest interest to appoint an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Compliance Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Non-employee directors serve on one or two committees of the Board. The committees ofinterim CEO, the Board meet regularly and report on their activities and results of meetings to the full Board. Only directors that have been determined by the Board to be independent as defined by the associated NASDAQ rules may serve on Board committees.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|18


Corporate Governance

BOARD COMMITTEES
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is appointed to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities.Audit Committee members shall meet the independence and other applicable requirements of the SEC, the NASDAQ and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. All current members of the Audit Committee are independent and audit committee financial experts as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The Audit Committee’s primary duties and responsibilities are to:
Monitor and review the integrity of the Company’s financial reports and monitor and provide oversight of the Company’s systems of internal controls regarding accounting and financial reporting;
Engage and monitor the independence and performance of the Company’s independent auditors;
Monitor the independence and performance of the Company’s internal auditors; and
Providewill appoint a permanent replacement CEO. Our CEO succession plan also outlines an avenue of communication between the independent auditors, management, the internal audit department and the Board.
The Audit Committee has the authority to conduct or authorize investigations into any matter within the scope of its responsibilities and it shall have direct access to the independent auditors, as well as anyone in the Company. The Audit Committee has the ability to retain, at the Company’s expense, special legal, accounting, or other consultants or advisors it deems necessary in the performance of its duties or to assist in the conduct of any investigation.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee oversees the development and administration of the Company’s compensation policies and programs. As described in its charter, the Compensation Committee's primary responsibilities are to:
Develop and oversee the implementation of the Company's compensation philosophy with respect to its directors, CEO, other NEOs and other executive officers who report directly to the CEO;
Assure that the Company's executives are compensated in a non-discriminatory manner, consistent with such compensation philosophy, internal equity considerations, and market practice;
Ensure pay for performance decisions take into consideration compliance with all applicable laws and regulations that have an impact on our business in order to maintain the highest standards of integrity and ethical conduct;
Review and approve the Company’s CD&A disclosure containing the Company’s compensation policies and the reasoning behind such policies; and
Review compensation programs and policies for features that may encourage excessive risk taking, and determine the extent to which there may be a connection between compensation and risk.
As stated in its charter, the Compensation Committee has sole authority to retain and terminate an independent consulting firm. Pursuant to this authority, the Compensation Committee has engaged FW Cook to assist in the evaluation of executive compensation. For more information on the responsibilities and activities of the Compensation Committee, refer to the CD&A section in this Proxy Statement.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|19


Corporate Governance

Compliance Committee
The Compliance Committee oversees the Company’s compliance and ethics programs, policies and procedures. As more fully described in its charter, the Compliance Committee has the following responsibilities:
Oversee matters of non-financial compliance including; significant legal or regulatory compliance exposure and material reports or inquiries from government or regulatory agencies;
Oversee the Company’s efforts to implement compliance programs, policies and procedures in response to compliance and regulatory risks;
Oversee the investigation of, and may also request the investigations of, any instances of noncompliance issues with laws or the Company’s compliance programs, policies or procedures or potential compliance violations reported to the committee;
Regularly review the Company’s compliance risk assessment plan with the Company’s Chief Compliance Officer; and
Review compliance related complaints from internal and external sources.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
communication plan and provides for periodic review of the plan by our Board.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee ensures that the Board has an effective corporate governance program in place by reviewing the Company’s corporate governance practices and related public issues important to the Company, and making recommendations to the Board on such issues. As more fully described in its charter,oversees succession planning for our executive officers. At least annually, our CEO meets with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for:

Conducting annual reviewsto discuss succession planning for all executive officers and, in the CEO’s discretion, any of the compositionCEO’s direct reports (collectively, “senior management”). The CEO meets at least annually with the Compensation Committee to discuss the performance of all committees;
Making recommendations concerningsenior management and communicates any performance-related issues to the full Board dynamics;
Monitoringto the Company’sextent such issues impact the management succession plan for key positions withinplan.

Director Independence

Our Board has established guidelines, which conform to the Company’s leadership team;

Overseeingindependence requirements included in the Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules and regulations, to assist it in determining director educationindependence. Based on these guidelines, our Board has determined that Messrs. Fain, Fredrickson, Marino, Nussle, Paschke, Tabakin and development;Weaver and
Ensuring Mses. Brown, Connelly and Turner are independent according to Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules. In addition, our Board has determined that Ms. Gadhia, if elected to our Board, will be independent according to Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules.

Director Attendance

During 2023, our Board held 13 meetings. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of our Board and its committees conduct and discuss their annual self-evaluations.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is also responsible for identifying, reviewing and recommending nominees for electionthe Committees on which the director served during 2023. Directors are encouraged to the Board. In addition to considering the qualifications of candidates suggested by current directors and officers of the Company, they also consider any candidates who may be recommended by stockholders in accordance with Section 2.11 of the Company’s By-laws and Article Five of the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. For more information on the procedures for submission of stockholder proposals, see the “Submission of Stockholder Proposals” section. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee uses the same criteria in evaluating any candidates nominated by a stockholder as it does for current directors and officers of the Company.

Notice ofattend our Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|20


all then serving directors attended our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“2023 Annual Meeting”).

Corporate Governance2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 7


COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
The

Corporate Governance

Communications with Our Board

Stockholders may communicate with members of our Board by transmitting their correspondence by mail or email. All such communications should be sent to the attention of our Corporate Secretary as specified below:

Corporate Secretary

PRA Group, Inc.

120 Corporate Boulevard

Norfolk, Virginia 23502

corporatesecretary@pragroup.com

Communications that are addressed to one or more directors will be collected and organized by our Corporate Secretary and forwarded to our Chairman, or if addressed to a specific independent director, to that director, as soon as practicable. Communications that are abusive, derogatory or that present safety or security concerns may be handled differently. If multiple communications are received on a similar topic, our Corporate Secretary may forward only representative correspondence or summaries. Our Corporate Secretary will determine whether any communication addressed to our entire Board as a whole should be properly addressed by our entire Board or by a Committee. If a response to the communication is warranted, the content and method of the response will be coordinated with our Corporate Secretary. Stockholders may use the Company’s toll-free ethics hotline to communicate concerns to our Board in a confidential or anonymous manner by dialing 1-855-874-2659. All stockholder communications to the Company’s confidential ethics hotline are referred to our Lead Independent Director.

Director Compensation

Our Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, setsestablishes the compensation for our non-employee directors to fairly compensate them directors. Non-employee director compensation for the work required of them, based on the Company's size and scope. In addition to2023 included annual cash retainers non-employee directors receive annual equity awards in order to align their interests with the long-term interests of the Company's stockholders. In early 2016, FW Cook provided the Compensationfor our Board members, Board Chair, Committee with a peer group analysis of the compensation of the directors of companies in the Compensation Peer Group listed on page 31 of this Proxy Statement. The peer group analysis indicated that some elements of the non-employee director compensation fell below median as compared to the Compensation Peer Group. Based on this analysis, the Compensationmembers, Committee made changes, as shown in the chart below, to better align director compensation with the competitive market.

Annual Member Retainers20152016
Annual Retainer (Cash)$60,000$60,000
Annual Retainer (Company Stock)$110,000$110,000
   
Annual Committee Chair Retainers (Cash)20152016
Audit Committee$25,000$25,000
Compensation Committee$15,000$17,500
Compliance Committee$15,000$15,000
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee$10,000$15,000
   
Annual Committee Member Retainers (Cash)20152016
Audit Committee$12,500$12,500
Compensation Committee$7,500$8,750
Compliance Committee$7,500$7,500
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee$5,000$7,500
   
 20152016
Lead Director Retainer (Cash)$15,000$25,000
Chairs, and our Lead Independent Director. On the date of the 2015our 2023 Annual Meeting, of Stockholders, each non-employee director in service at the time was awarded non-vested sharesalso received an equity award valued at approximately $110,000. Annual director$155,000 that consisted of restricted stock awards become fully vested one year afterunits (“RSUs”) that vest on the anniversary of the grant date. Thisdate or the date of the next annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders that follows the grant date, if earlier. The vesting schedule combined withfor the targetedRSUs and the director stock ownership policyguidelines described below advances the alignment of directors'are intended to align our non-employee directors’ economic interests with those of our stockholders.

Cash retainers for our Board for 2023 were as follows:

Annual Cash Retainers

2023

Chairman

$  125,000

Lead Director

$   30,000

Audit Committee Chair

$   30,000

Compensation Committee Chair

$   30,000

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compliance Committee Chair

$   30,000

Risk Committee Chair

$   30,000

Board Member

$   70,000

Audit Committee Member

$   15,000

Compensation Committee Member

$   15,000

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compliance Committee Members

$   15,000

Risk Committee Member

$   15,000

Note that Committee Chairs only receive a retainer for their service as Committee Chairs and not also for serving as Committee Members.

8 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Corporate Governance

Our non-employee directors received the following compensation for service during 2023:

   

Name(1)

  

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash

 Stock
Awards
(2)
 Total
   

Vikram A. Atal(3)

  $  28,750 $        0   $   28,750  
   

Danielle M. Brown

  $ 100,000 $  154,991    $  254,991   
   

Marjorie M. Connelly

  $ 115,000 $  154,991    $  269,991   
   

John H. Fain

  $ 107,500 $  154,991    $  262,491   
   

Steven D. Fredrickson

  $ 195,000 $  154,991    $  349,991   
   

James A. Nussle

  $ 115,000 $  154,991    $  269,991   
   

Geir L. Olsen

  $  28,800 $  154,978    $  183,778   
   

Brett L. Paschke

  $ 107,500 $  154,991    $  262,491   
   

Scott M. Tabakin

  $ 107,500 $  154,991    $  262,491   
   

Peggy P. Turner

  $ 100,000 $  154,991    $  254,991   
   

Lance L. Weaver

  $ 115,000 $  154,991    $  269,991   

 

(1)   Mr. Marino was elected to our Board effective March 15, 2024.

(2)   Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards calculated by multiplying the number of RSUs granted by the closing price of our common stock on the grant dates, which was $23.67 on June 13, 2023 and $23.10 on June 15, 2023, respectively. The actual amount of compensation realized by a director will depend upon the market price of our common stock on the vesting date.

(3)   Mr. Atal was appointed as the Company’s President and CEO effective March 27, 2023. Amounts reflect his compensation for service as a non-employee director prior to his appointment as the Company’s President and CEO.

In addition to the compensation described above, each non-employee director is reimbursed for travel expenses incurred for attending Board meetings and reasonable expenses associated with participating in continuing education programs. We offer no retirement benefits or perquisites to directors. We maintain policies of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance covering all directors.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Recognizing that each director should have a substantial personal investment in the Company, theour Board has adopted a target stock ownership policy which applies to each director, requiring a personal holdingguidelines that require beneficial ownership by each non-employeedirector of a numbershares of sharesour common stock valued at not less than five times the director'sdirector’s annual cash retainer (cash portion), exclusive of Committee retainers.for serving on our Board. Directors are expected to acquire and maintain this share ownership threshold within five years after joining theour Board. All board membersAs of March 31, 2024, all non-employee directors who have served on our Board for at least five years have met the stockholding requirement or are in the processstock ownership requirement.

Code of meeting the requirement within the five year time period. In 2015,Conduct

Our Board has adopted a Code of Conduct, which applies to our directors and all employees of the Company, offeredincluding our CEO and our CFO, who is also our principal accounting officer. Our Code of Conduct, which can be found on the Investor Relations page of our website at www.pragroup.com, governs the work behavior and business relationships of the Company’s directors, officers, employees and independent third parties acting on behalf of the Company and sets forth the Company’s policies regarding ethics and standards of business conduct, including conflicts of interest and insider trading. We will disclose amendments to our Code of Conduct, as well as any waivers of the Code, on our website as permitted by SEC rules. During 2023, there were no compensation to itswaivers of our Code of Conduct for any director or executive officer.

Policy for Approval of Related Party Transactions

Our Board has adopted a written policy (“Related Party Transaction Policy”) for review, approval and disclosure of transactions between the Company and directors, otherdirector nominees, executive officers, beneficial owners of more than their annual retainers, including annual committee chair5% of our common stock and member retainers,immediate family members of any of the foregoing (each, a “related party”). Under our Related Party Transaction Policy, the Nominating and stock awards; however, each director is reimbursed for travel expensesCorporate Governance Committee must approve or ratify any related party transaction that involves greater than $120,000 in connectiona calendar year and in which a related party has a direct or indirect material interest. Under our Related Party Transaction Policy, certain transactions with attendance at Board meetings and for all reasonable expenses associated with continuing education programs. The Company offers no retirement benefits or other perquisites to directors. The Company maintains policies of directors' and officers' liability insurance covering all directors. The Company's CEO received no additional compensation for hisrelated parties are deemed pre-approved, such as transactions in which the related party’s interest arises solely from the person’s service as a director of another entity that is a party to the transaction, certain charitable contributions and transactions determined by competitive bids. In assessing a related party transaction, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers several factors including the commercial reasonableness of the terms of the transaction, the materiality of the transaction to the Company and the impact of the transaction on the related party’s independence.

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 9


Corporate Governance

Pledging

Our Anti-Pledging Policy prohibits our directors, officers and employees from pledging, alienating, attaching or otherwise encumbering our common stock and any purported pledge, alienation, attachment or encumbrance thereof is void and unenforceable against the Company or any affiliate of the Company.

Hedging

Our Anti-Hedging Policy prohibits our directors, officers and employees from speculating or hedging their interests in equity securities of the Company. Accordingly, directors, officers and employees may not “play the market” in equity securities of the Company by engaging in speculative transactions such as any direct or indirect hedging transaction that could reduce or limit the individual’s economic risk with respect to his or her holdings, ownership or interest in the common stock or other securities of the Company, including outstanding RSU and performance stock unit (“PSU”) awards, the value of which are derived from, make reference to or are based on the value or market price of common stock or other securities of the Company. Prohibited transactions include same day purchase and sales, prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, short sales, collars, puts, calls or other derivative securities that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in market value of the equity securities of the Company.

10 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Proposal 1: Election of Directors

Directors are elected at each annual meeting to serve until the next annual meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Each director nominee was nominated by our Board for election upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Moreover, each nominee was elected previously by our stockholders except Mr. Marino and Ms. Gadhia.

Our Board currently consists of 12 directors. Mr. Fain will retire from our Board effective June 13, 2024, which is consistent with our Corporate Governance Guidelines that restrict the nomination for re-election of a person who will be 75 years of age on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders at which the person’s election would be considered. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee did not nominate Mr. Nussle for re-election at his request due to his expanded professional responsibilities. As a result, our Board will be reduced to 11 directors as of the date of the Annual Meeting.

Nominees for director who receive the affirmative votes of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting will be elected. Any nominee for director who does not receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast must offer promptly in writing to submit the director’s resignation to our Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will then consider the offer and will recommend to our full Board what action should be taken. Our Board will consider all factors it deems relevant to the best interests of the Company and our stockholders and determine whether to accept the director’s resignation within a reasonable period of time after certification of the election results.

Each nominee has consented to serve as a director if elected. We have no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable or unwilling for good cause to serve. However, if any nominee should become unable or unwilling to serve, proxies may be voted for another person nominated as a substitute by our Board or our Board may reduce the number of directors. If our Board nominates a substitute, the shares represented by all valid proxies will be voted for that nominee.

We did not receive any nominations or recommendations for director from stockholders for consideration at the Annual Meeting.

LOGO

OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH

DIRECTOR NOMINEE.

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 11


Director Nominees

LOGO

Age: 68

Mr. Atal has served as the Company’s President and CEO since March 27, 2023. From 2013 until March 27, 2023, Mr. Atal served as President of Atal Advisers, LLC, a business and strategy consulting firm. Since 2016, he has also served as Senior Advisor to McKinsey and Company, Inc., covering the banking, payments, consumer lending and analytics domains. Prior to forming Atal Advisers, Mr. Atal served in executive roles with increasing responsibility with Citigroup, Inc. (“Citigroup”) (NYSE) for 27 years, including as Executive Vice President for Citigroup’s global consumer bank from 2008 to 2013, where he had responsibility for shaping the consumer bank as an information-centric enterprise, leveraging analytics and data to drive growth, and overseeing loss mitigation efforts related to Citigroup’s high-risk consumer portfolio through the financial crisis; Chairman and CEO for Citi Cards’ branded and retail partner cards franchise in North America; leadership of partnership programs for Citi Cards, serving as CFO of the U.S. cards franchise and overseeing SEC, regulatory and business financial reporting. Since 2017, Mr. Atal has served on the board of directors, including on the audit committee, of Goldman Sachs Bank USA.

Director Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Atal’s experience as a senior executive in the financial services industry along with his significant international experience working for complex, publicly traded organizations qualify him to serve on our
Board.

LOGO

Financial Industry

LOGO

Government & Regulatory

LOGO

International/Global

LOGO

Public Company

LOGO

Risk Oversight

LOGO

Strategic Planning

Public Company Directorships:

Goldman Sachs Bank USA

Education:

Fellow of U.K. Charter Accountants Institute
B.S., Economics London School of Economics
B.A. Mathematics, St. Stephens College, Delhi

LOGO

Age: 53

Independent

Committees: Compensation, Risk

Ms. Brown has served as Chief Information Officer (“CIO”) for Whirlpool Corporation (“Whirlpool”) (NYSE), a global kitchen and laundry company, since November 2020. Ms. Brown, who is a certified Lean Six Sigma Black Belt, has over 20 years of experience in global technology services. Before joining Whirlpool, she served for four years as the CIO for Brunswick Corporation (“Brunswick”) (NYSE), a global manufacturer and marketer of recreation products. Prior to her role at Brunswick, Ms. Brown served for 16 years in roles of increasing responsibility with DuPont Corporation (“DuPont”) (NYSE), including CIO for a global business unit and head of global transformation and productivity. During her time at DuPont, Ms. Brown was also head of global data, business insight and analytics and global information technology strategy, planning, organization development and compliance.

Director Skills and Qualifications:

Ms. Brown’s experiences, including her tenure as CIO of large, publicly traded and global companies, provide her with a comprehensive understanding of the complex issues facing public companies and qualify her to serve on our Board.

LOGO

Information Technology/Data Governance/

Cybersecurity Experience

LOGO

International/Global

LOGO

Public Company

LOGO

Risk Oversight

LOGO

Strategic Planning

Education:

MBA, Drexel University
M.S., Management Information Systems, Penn State University
B.S., Computer Science, Indiana University

12 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Director Nominees

LOGO

Age: 62

Independent

Committees: Audit, Risk

Ms. Connelly has approximately 30 years of experience as an executive in financial services and operations. From 2014 until her retirement in 2017, Ms. Connelly was the Chief Operating Officer of Convergys Corporation, a publicly traded, global leader in customer management. From 2012 to 2013, she was the Interim President of Longwood University. From 2009 to 2011, Ms. Connelly was the Global Chief Operating Officer at Barclaycard where she was responsible for the operations and technology support of the consumer and commercial credit card, merchant acquiring and point of sale finance businesses. From 2006 to 2008, Ms. Connelly was the Chief Operating Officer of Wachovia Securities, and prior to that, she spent 12 years at Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE) in roles of increasing responsibility, including Executive Vice President, Head of Infrastructure for U.S. credit card operations and interim Chief Information Officer. Since 2021, Ms. Connelly has served on the board of directors, including on the audit committee, nominating, governance and social responsibility committee, compensation and talent development committee and the innovation committee, of Altria Group, Inc. (NYSE) and previously served on our Board from 2013 to 2014.

Director Skills and Qualifications:

Ms. Connelly’s extensive experience in the financial services industry with publicly traded, global companies qualifies her to serve on our Board.

LOGO

Information Technology/Data Governance/

Cybersecurity Experience

LOGO

Financial Industry

LOGOInternational/Global
LOGOPublic CompanyLOGORisk Oversight

Public Company Directorships:

Altria Group, Inc.

Education:

Advanced Management Program, Harvard Business School
B.A., Political Science, University of Delaware

LOGO

Age: 64

Independent

Mr. Fredrickson, who is retired, has over 30 years of experience in the financial industry predominantly in executive roles with oversight of most key functions. He has served as Chairman of the Board since April 1, 2020, when he retired from the Company. From June 2017 until March 31, 2020, he served as the Company’s Executive Chairman to support the transition of the CEO role and expand the Company’s presence in Europe. Mr. Fredrickson was Chairman and CEO from 2002 until June 2017 and also served as the Company’s President from 1996 to August 2015. Prior to co-founding the Company in 1996, Mr. Fredrickson held leadership roles with Household International (“HI”) in various business units responsible for distressed consumer, commercial and commercial real estate debt. Before joining HI, Mr. Fredrickson specialized in corporate and real estate workouts at Continental Bank of Chicago.

Director Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Fredrickson’s leadership of the Company in his current and previous roles as Chairman, Executive Chairman, President and CEO, and his extensive industry knowledge qualify him to serve on our Board.

LOGOFinancial IndustryLOGOInternational/Global
LOGO

Public Company

LOGO

Risk Oversight

Education:

M.B.A., Finance, School of Business, University of Illinois
B.S., Business Administration, University of Denver

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 13


Director Nominees

LOGO

Age: 62

Independent

Committee: Audit

Ms. Gadhia founded the financial technology company Snoop in 2019 and served as its Executive Chair until July 2023 when she retired. She is a Chartered Accountant who began her career with Ernst & Young LLP and later joined Norwich Union (now Aviva) as a Senior Manager before founding Virgin Direct in 1995, which was acquired by the Royal Bank of Scotland (“RBS”) in 2001. She subsequently spent five years at RBS before returning to Virgin Money as CEO from 2007 to 2018. Following the sale of Virgin Money, Ms. Gadhia joined Salesforce as CEO – United Kingdom and Ireland from 2019 until 2021, when she joined Snoop full-time.

Ms. Gadhia has served as Chair of the Boards of His Majesty’s Revenue & Customs since 2020, MoneyFarm, an online investment advisor and digital wealth management company, since 2022; and Ozone API since 2024. She has also served as Senior Advisor for Vanquis Banking Group PLC (LSE), which acquired Snoop, since 2023 and previously as Senior Advisor for UniCredit from 2023 – 2024.

Ms Gadhia was awarded Commander of the Order of the British Empire (“CBE”) in 2013 for her services to banking and the community, Dame CBE in 2019 for her services to the financial industry in general and women in the financial industry in particular and Commander of the Royal Victorian Order in 2022.

Director Skills and Qualifications:

Ms. Gadhia’s extensive financial industry experience, including as a founder of two financial services companies, as well as her leadership roles in public companies, qualifies her to serve on our Board.

LOGOFinancial IndustryLOGOGovernment & Regulatory
LOGOInternational/GlobalLOGOPublic Company
LOGO

Risk Oversight

LOGO

Strategic Planning

Education:

B.A., History, University of London

LOGO

Age: 67

Independent

Committee: Risk

Mr. Marino has over 30 years of experience in the consumer finance industry and served most recently as Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer and CEO of the Payment Solutions business at Synchrony Financial, Inc. (“Synchrony”), (NYSE) a publicly traded financial services company. Prior to the spin-off of Synchrony by General Electric Corporation (“GE”) in 2014, Marino served as CEO of Sales Finance from 2002 until 2014 for GE’s North American retail finance business. He also previously served as President of Monogram Credit Services, a joint venture between GE and Bank One Corporation (now part of JPMorgan Chase) and Chief Risk Officer – Consumer Cards Services for GE Capital. Since 2020, Mr. Marino has served on the board of directors of Upbound Group, Inc. (formerly Rent-A-Center, Inc.), (NASDAQ), a publicly traded, lease-to-own provider, including on its audit, nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees.

Director Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Marino’s executive leadership roles and strong consumer finance background, including positions in risk, business development and operations qualify him to serve on our Board.

LOGOFinancial IndustryLOGOPublic Company
LOGO

Risk Oversight

LOGO

Strategic Planning

Public Company Directorships:

Upbound Group, Inc.

Education:

M.B.A., Finance, School of Business, University of Michigan
B.S., Biology, Syracuse University

14 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Director Nominees

LOGO

Age: 51

Independent

Committee: Nominating and Corporate Governance

Mr. Olsen has served as the CEO of Andenes Investments, a private investment company focusing on finance and technology since 2018. He was the CEO and a board member of Aktiv Kapital, AS, a leading European consumer debt purchaser, from September 2011 until its acquisition by the Company in 2014. From August 2014 until January 2016, Mr. Olsen served as the CEO of PRA Group Europe. Prior to Aktiv Kapital, Mr. Olsen held various leadership roles in sales, marketing and strategy with Cisco Systems and Tandberg, a Norwegian company that Cisco acquired in 2010. He also advised financial services and technology companies as a consultant at McKinsey & Company for five years prior to joining Tandberg. In 2013, Mr. Olsen cofounded Ubon Partners, an investment company focused on early-stage companies in technology and financial services, and was a partner until December 2018. He is currently a board member for various private portfolio companies such as Avida Finans, First Fondene AS, Molo Finance and Huma AS. He is also a director of Pexip ASA, a Norwegian technology company listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange.

Director Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Olsen’s in-depth understanding of the European consumer finance and debt purchase markets and experience in using technology to transform businesses qualify him to serve on our Board.

LOGOFinancial IndustryLOGOInternational/Global
LOGO

Public Company

LOGO

Risk Oversight

LOGOStrategic Planning

Public Company Directorships:

Pexip ASA

Education:

Master of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics

LOGO

Age: 55

Independent

Committees: Audit, Compensation (Chair)

Mr. Paschke is Managing Partner of WinForest Partners, a private equity firm focused on investments in healthcare, technology and services. Before transitioning to a full-time role with WinForest in December 2023, Mr. Paschke served as a Senior Director of Investment Banking for William Blair & Company, a leading global investment banking firm focused on serving high quality growth companies (“William Blair”) from January 2023 to December 2023, having previously served as Vice Chair of Investment Banking at William Blair from 2021 to January 2023. Mr. Paschke joined William Blair in 1997 and served in roles of increasing responsibility, including leader of the Equity Capital Markets Group from 2009 to 2020. Since 2021 Mr. Paschke has served on the board of directors and audit committee for Duluth Holdings Inc. (Nasdaq).

Director Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Paschke’s executive leadership roles and extensive experience working with public companies and particularly his role as a leader of William Blair’s Equity Capital Markets and Public Company Investment Banking, provide him with the requisite management experience and business expertise to serve on our Board.

LOGOFinancial IndustryLOGOInternational/Global
LOGO

Public Company

LOGO

Strategic Planning

Public Company Directorships:

Duluth Holdings Inc.

Education:

M.B.A, Harvard Business School
B.A., Politics, Princeton University

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 15


Director Nominees

LOGO

Age: 65

Independent

Committees: Audit, Risk (Chair)

Mr. Tabakin is an executive-level consultant, advising boards and management teams on strategy, capital raising, capital structures and exit strategies. He was a certified public accountant and has 40 years of public company and healthcare industry experience, which includes service as Executive Vice President and CFO of Value Options, Inc. (acquired by Anthem, Inc., NYSE); Executive Vice President and CFO of Bravo Health, Inc. (acquired by Cigna Corporation, NYSE); Executive Vice President and CFO of AMERIGROUP Corporation (NYSE, acquired by Anthem, Inc.); Executive Vice President and CFO of Beverly Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE, now known as Golden Gate National Senior Care, LLC); and as an executive with Ernst & Young LLP.

Director Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Tabakin’s experiences, including his tenure as the CFO of two large publicly traded companies, provide him with a comprehensive understanding of the complex financial and legal issues facing public companies and qualify him to serve on our Board.

LOGOFinancial IndustryLOGOGovernment & Regulatory
LOGO

Public Company

LOGO

Risk Oversight

LOGOStrategic Planning

Education:

B.S., Accounting, University of Illinois

LOGO

Age: 62

Independent

Committees: Nominating and Corporate Governance, Risk

Ms. Turner has served as Vice President and Executive Advisor of the Social Innovation Department of Toyota Motors North America (“Toyota Motors”) since January 2022. Prior to her current position, she served as Vice President of Lexus Guest Retention and Loyalty from 2019 to 2022, Vice President of Lexus Guest Experience from 2012 to 2019 and Vice President of Toyota Customer Relations from 2011 to 2012. Ms. Turner joined Toyota Motors in 1991 and held various positions related to parts, customer service, new business development, procurement, supply chain management and real estate before becoming Vice President, Toyota Customer Relations in 2011.

Director Skills and Qualifications:

Ms. Turner’s executive leadership experience and her significant experience developing and executing on initiatives focused on maximizing customer experience qualify her to serve on our board.

LOGOInternational/GlobalLOGOPublic Company
LOGOStrategic Planning

Education:

B.A., University of California Irvine
M.B.A., Loyola Marymount University

16 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Director Nominees

LOGO

Age: 69

Lead Independent Director

Committees: Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair)

Mr. Weaver serves as the Lead Independent Director and is an accomplished consumer financial services executive with nearly 40 years of experience across the consumer lending, mortgage and credit card asset classes. He has served as an advisor to financial services companies, including Visa Inc. (NYSE), Citigroup (NYSE), Total System Services, Inc. and Apollo Global Management, Inc., and was President, Money Cards for Virgin Money Holdings in the U.K. from 2013 until his retirement in 2015. Before holding these positions, Mr. Weaver’s experience includes serving as President of EMEA Card Services for Bank of America Corporation (NYSE); service on the senior management team of MBNA Corporation for 15 years; and executive leadership roles with Citigroup, Wells Fargo & Company (NYSE) and Maryland National Bank. From 2017 to 2020, Mr. Weaver served on the board of directors of Internap Corporation, a leading provider of high-performance data center services including high-density colocation and value-added services such as managed hosting, cloud and network connectivity.

Director Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Weaver’s international experiences in the financial services industry along with his experience working for complex, highly regulated, publicly traded organizations qualify him to serve on our Board.

LOGOFinancial IndustryLOGOGovernment & Regulatory
LOGO

International/Global

LOGO

Public Company

LOGORisk Oversight

Education:

B.S., Marketing, Georgetown University

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 17


Proposal 2: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee is responsible for the engagement, compensation and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee is also directly involved in the selection of the lead engagement partner from our independent registered public accounting firm in conjunction with the periodic mandated rotation of the lead partner. As ratified by stockholders at the 2023 Annual Meeting, the Audit Committee appointed Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”) to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2023.

In evaluating the performance and considering the engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm, including whether to rotate firms, the Audit Committee considers various factors, including the firm’s capability and expertise in handling the scope and complexity of our audit, information related to audit effectiveness, fees and the potential impact of changing firms. Based on these factors, the Audit Committee has determined that the continued engagement of EY as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. As a result, the Audit Committee has selected EY to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024.

Although not required to do so, our Board is submitting the appointment of EY for ratification by our stockholders as a matter of good corporate governance practice. The Audit Committee is not required to take any action based on the outcome of the vote on this Proposal 2. However, if our stockholders do not ratify the appointment of EY, the Audit Committee will consider whether to select a different independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the selection of EY is ratified by our stockholders, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

Representatives of EY are expected to attend the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate stockholder questions.

LOGO

OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF
THE APPOINTMENT OF EY AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2024.

18 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Proposal 2: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Fees Paid to EY

The following table sets forth the fees billed by EY for the years ended December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2023.

  
  

 

    2022        2023    
  

Audit Fees(1)

 $4,460,500     $4,303,500   
  

Audit-Related Fees(2)

 $60,000     $—   
  

Tax Fees(3)

 $16,200     $12,000   
  

All Other Fees(4)

 $2,500     $18,500   
  

Total

 $4,539,200     $4,334,000   

 

(1)  Audit Fees relate primarily to professional services rendered for the audits of our annual consolidated financial statements and effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and reviews of the quarterly consolidated financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q as well as statutory audit fees related to our wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries.

(2)  Audit-Related Fees relate primarily to accounting consultations.

(3)  Tax Fees relate primarily to permitted tax-related advisory services.

(4)  All Other Fees relate to professional services rendered for permitted advisory services.

   

   

   

   

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures that require the pre-approval of audit, audit-related and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. In the event that the Audit Committee Chair provides such pre-approval, the Audit Committee Chair will report any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next meeting. During 2023, all audit, audit-related and permissible non-audit services provided by EY were pre-approved by the Audit Committee or Audit Committee Chair. The Audit Committee has considered the provision of these services by EY and has determined that the services were compatible with EY maintaining its independence.

Responsibilities

The Audit Committee’s written charter, adopted by our Board, outlines the Audit Committee’s organization, meeting protocol, and responsibilities. The Audit Committee reviews the charter annually and recommends amendments as necessary to our Board for its approval. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Audit Committee meets regularly, together with management, the internal auditor and the independent registered public accounting firm. During these meetings, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses draft financial statements and earnings releases, significant accounting and financial reporting matters, and the results of internal and external audit work. The Audit Committee also meets in periodic executive sessions with our independent registered public accounting firm to discuss the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting and any other matters as appropriate. Additionally, the Audit Committee meets in periodic executive sessions with each of the CFO and the head of our internal audit department.

The Audit Committee relies on the knowledge and expertise of management and our independent registered public accounting firm in carrying out its oversight responsibilities. Management is responsible for preparing the Company’s consolidated financial statements, maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, and assessing the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for conducting independent audits of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, and for expressing opinions on the conformity of the financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to oversee these activities, including discussing with our independent registered public accounting firm the scope of, plans for, and results of the annual audit. The Audit Committee is also responsible for oversight of the internal audit function, including its charter, audit plan, budget, performance and activities.

Report of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and EY the Company’s 2023 audited financial statements and the assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has also discussed with EY the matters required to be discussed by applicable standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. In addition, the Audit Committee has received from EY the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding EY’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with EY its independence.

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 19


Proposal 2: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board that the audited financial statements be included in the 2023 Form 10-K for filing with the SEC.

Audit Committee

Marjorie M. Connelly, Chair

John H. Fain

Brett L. Paschke

Scott M. Tabakin

20 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Executive Officers

Name and Position

Age as
of
March 31,
2024
Background and Experience

Vikram A. Atal
President and Chief Executive Officer

67

See the biographical information for Mr. Atal under “Director Nominees” on page 12 of this Proxy Statement.

Rakesh Sehgal
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

51

Mr. Sehgal has over 25 years of experience in the financial services industry and has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of the Company since September 2023. He joined the Company in May 2022 as Senior Vice President, Head of Corporate Development and served in that role until he was promoted into his current role. Prior to joining the Company in May 2022, Mr. Sehgal held roles of increasing responsibility with General Electric and GE Capital, including as Managing Director in the mergers and acquisitions group. Prior to his nine years with General Electric and GE Capital, Sehgal was in the investment banking group at Barclays Capital and Lehman Brothers where he advised specialty finance and other companies on mergers and acquisitions and leveraged finance transactions. Mr. Sehgal holds a B.A. in Accounting and Economics Management from Ohio Wesleyan University and an M.B.A. in Strategy & Management and Finance from Northwestern University.

Martin Sjölund
President, PRA Group Europe

51

Mr. Sjölund has over 20 years of experience in leadership roles for large, complex organizations where he has overseen strategy, operations, mergers and acquisitions, marketing and sales. He has served as President of PRA Group Europe since June 2018 leading all areas of the European business, with expanded responsibility for Canada and Australia beginning in 2023. Mr. Sjölund served as Director – Group Strategy and Corporate Development (Europe) of Aktiv Kapital from 2011 until 2014 when Aktiv Kapital was acquired by the Company. He held the same position with us until November 2015 when he was appointed Chief Operating Officer – Europe, a position he held until June 2018 that required oversight of all Europe collections operations. Mr. Sjölund holds an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago and graduated magna cum laude with a B.S. in International Business from Georgetown University.

LaTisha O. Tarrant
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Human Resources Officer

51

Ms. Tarrant has over 20 years of experience advising public companies on securities, corporate governance, executive compensation, mergers and acquisitions and general corporate matters. She has served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Human Resource Officer since February 2023. Ms. Tarrant joined us in March 2016 as Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and served in that role until January 2018 when she was appointed Corporate Secretary. In April 2021, Ms. Tarrant was promoted to Senior Vice President and served in that role until September 2022 when she was promoted to Chief Human Resources Officer, a role that she held until February 2023 when she assumed the additional role of General Counsel. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Tarrant served as managing associate general counsel at Anthem, Inc. (NYSE, now Elevance Health, Inc.), and as senior counsel and partner at the law firm of McGuire Woods LLP. Ms. Tarrant holds a B.A. in International Relations – Political Economy from The College of William and Mary and a J.D. from the University of Texas at Austin School of Law. She is also a Certified Corporate Governance Professional®.

R. Owen James

Executive Vice President, Global

Investments Officer

57

Mr. James has over 30 years of experience in the global nonperforming loan industry serving in leadership roles that oversaw operations, business development and investments. He has served as Executive Vice President, Global Investments Officer since June 2023. Prior to his current role, Mr. James served as Managing Director of Acquisitions for Europe, a position he assumed in July 2014. From 2012, when Mr. James joined the Company as part of its acquisition of MacKenzie Hall, until July 2014, Mr. James served in roles of increasing responsibility with the Company, including as CEO of MacKenzie Hall and the Company’s UK subsidiary. Prior to joining us, Mr. James spent 15 years in a variety of senior roles at Intrum Justitia AB (now Intrum AB). Mr. James holds a B.B.A. in Management from the University of Glamorgan.

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 21


Proposal 3: Approval of NEO Compensation

We are asking our stockholders to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in the following pages of this Proxy Statement, including the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section and accompanying compensation tables and narrative discussion. A vote in favor of this Proposal 3 will not approve any specific item of compensation but will instead reflect your support for the overall compensation of our NEOs.

The objectives of our executive compensation program include attracting, retaining and motivating highly skilled executives who will drive the attainment of our short- and long-term financial and strategic objectives, including creating value for our stockholders. We seek to closely align the interests of our NEOs with the interests of our stockholders while rewarding performance appropriately and discouraging unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. We encourage stockholders to carefully review the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section and accompanying compensation tables and narrative discussion beginning on page 23 for a more detailed description of our executive compensation program and decisions, including our pay-for-performance philosophy and alignment.

At our 2023 Annual Meeting, over 93% of the shares voted were cast in support of the compensation of our NEOs. Considering the favorable results of this vote, the Compensation Committee did not make substantial changes to our 2023 executive compensation program for our NEOs. Our Board recommends that stockholders again approve and support the decisions pertaining to the compensation of our NEOs and our executive compensation program.

Although the vote on Proposal 3 is not binding on the Company, our Board or the Compensation Committee, the vote will provide important information regarding stockholder sentiment about the Company’s executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices. We value the opinions of our stockholders and will consider any concerns raised, as reflected by any significant negative vote on this Proposal 3, when making future executive compensation decisions.

We currently intend to request stockholder approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of our NEOs at our 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholder, which is consistent with stockholder approval, on an advisory basis, at last year’s Annual Meeting of the 1-year option for the frequency of our Say-on-Pay vote.

LOGO

OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to our Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

Compensation Committee

Brett L. Paschke, Chair

Danielle M. Brown

John H. Fain

James A. Nussle

22 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Executive Summary

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) is intended to provide you with a description of our executive compensation program, with a focus on the Compensation Committee’s decisions with respect to our NEOs for the year ended December 31, 2023. As the Compensation Committee oversaw and decided executive compensation matters during fiscal year 2023, it considered several items, including:

the Company’s financial performance for 2023;

changes in the Company’s executive leadership;

significant accomplishments by the current NEOs, which both stabilized the Company and, acting with speed and urgency, positioned it for an effective turnaround of its financial performance; and

the importance of delivering value to the Company’s stockholders while retaining the Company’s executive officers appointed during 2023.

Company’s 2023 Financial Performance

For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company’s financial performance was marked by the following:

Total portfolio purchases were $1.2 billion in 2023 compared to $850.0 million in 2022.

Total cash collections (collections on our owned finance receivables portfolios) remained stable at $1.7 billion for both 2023 and 2022.

Total revenues were $802.6 million in 2023 compared to $966.5 million in 2022.

Total operating expenses were $702.1 million in 2023 compared to $680.7 million in 2022.

Net income/(loss) attributable to the Company was ($83.5) million in 2023, compared to $117.1 million in 2022.

Our cash efficiency ratio (cash receipts, which are cash collections plus fee income, less operating expenses, divided by cash receipts) was 58.0% in 2023 compared to 61.0% in 2022.

Estimated remaining collections (the sum of all future projected cash collections on our owned finance receivables portfolios) was $6.4 billion at the end of 2023, compared to $5.7 billion at the end of 2022.

2023 TOTAL PORTFOLIO

PURCHASES

$1.2B

2023 TOTAL CASH

COLLECTIONS

$1.7B

2023 ¯TOTAL REVENUES

$802.6M

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 23


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Changes in Executive Leadership During 2023

During 2023, there were significant changes in our executive leadership team, including the CEO. Effective March 27, 2023, the Board appointed Mr. Atal to replace Kevin P. Stevenson as our President and CEO. Shortly thereafter, with the Board’s support and based upon his extensive operational experience, Mr. Atal assumed direct responsibility for the Company’s U.S. operations when Steven C. Roberts retired on March 31, 2023 as our Executive Vice President, Global Operations Officer. Mr. Sjölund continued to lead Europe’s operations in his capacity as President, PRA Group Europe, but assumed oversight of our operations in Canada and Australia, which had been led previously by Mr. Roberts.

Mr. Sehgal, who had served as our Senior Vice President and Head of Corporate Development, was promoted to Executive Vice President and CFO effective September 15, 2023 upon the resignation of Peter M. Graham, who accepted a CFO role with a larger public company.

Ms. Tarrant, who had previously been the Company’s Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, was promoted to Chief Human Resources Officer (“CHRO”) in August 2022 and subsequently assumed the role of Interim General Counsel effective February 27, 2023 upon the departure of the former General Counsel. She was promoted permanently to the role of Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Human Resources Officer effective July 26, 2023.

Mr. James was promoted to our Global Investments Officer effective May 2023 after leading the global investments function in the months preceding Christopher B. Graves’ retirement due to personal health reasons while continuing to oversee European investments in his capacity as Managing Director of Acquisitions for Europe.

Lastly, Ms. White, our former Executive Vice President, Chief Risk and Compliance Officer, resigned from the Company, effective July 31, 2023.

Due to the changes in our executive leadership during 2023, this CD&A will discuss the Compensation Committee’s decisions with respect to both current NEOs and former NEOs, which were the following for 2023:

NEO

Title

Vikram A. Atal

President and CEO

Rakesh Sehgal

Executive Vice President and CFO

Martin Sjölund

President, PRA Group Europe

LaTisha O. Tarrant

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and CHRO

R. Owen James

Executive Vice President, Global Investments Officer

Kevin P. Stevenson

Former President and CEO

Peter M. Graham

Former Executive Vice President and CFO

Laura B. White

Former Executive Vice President, Chief Risk and Compliance Officer

References in this CD&A to “current NEOs” mean: Messrs. Atal, Sehgal, Sjölund and James and Ms. Tarrant, while references to “former NEOs” mean Messrs. Stevenson and Graham and Ms. White.

Key Accomplishments by Current NEOs

As the Compensation Committee considered and made compensation decisions during 2023, it considered the following key accomplishments in 2023, led by current NEOs, which stabilized the Company and positioned it for the turnaround of its financial performance:

Operations

addressed significant operational gaps in our U.S. business while optimizing cash generation;

streamlined and simplified processes;

leveraged additional third parties to accelerate our speed to market and enhance our ability to adapt to business dynamics;

expanded our operational presence in low-cost locations,

24 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

closed a U.S. operating site;

restructured our Australian operations;

continued strong oversight and performance of our European business and Brazilian operations;

diversified the senior leadership team and enhanced capabilities in functions such as data and analytics that we believe are critical to the Company’s long-term success;

Financial

purchased $1.2 billion in portfolios during 2023, representing a 36% increase year-over-year;

avoided a ratings downgrade on the Company’s outstanding debt after the Company was placed on negative outlook by credit agencies that rate our corporate debt;

increased estimated remaining collections by 12% year-over-year following 3 years of decline;

proactively managed pricing on new investments to reflect current market conditions and improve expected portfolio returns;

Cultural

increased global participation in our employee engagement survey from 46% to 91%;

launched a culture initiative to reshape our corporate culture, which included a robust assessment of the current state of our culture, formalization of the desired state for our culture and action plans designed to achieve the desired state;

Legal and Compliance

resolved significant litigation and regulatory matters; and

maintained a strong control and compliance environment.

Philosophy and Objectives of Our Executive Compensation Program

We believe that the compensation realized by executives should generally reflect the individual skills and contributions of the executive, the Company’s overall performance against its strategic and operating plans and the impact of the Company’s performance on shareholder value.

The objectives of our executive compensation program include:

attracting, retaining and motivating highly skilled executives;

being competitive with our executive compensation peer companies identified under “Use of Competitive Data” below (“Compensation Peer Group”) and market data from similarly sized companies;

aligning the interests of our executives and stockholders;

driving the attainment of our short- and long-term financial and strategic objectives;

being performance-based, with variable pay constituting a significant portion of total compensation;

providing differentiated pay based on an executive’s contributions to Company performance;

maximizing the financial efficiency of the overall executive compensation program from tax, accounting and cash flow perspectives;

considering corporate governance best practices and the results of our annual say-on-pay proposal submitted to our stockholders;

paying competitively based on external market standards and internal parity, while considering emerging trends in executive compensation;

promoting internal pay equity;

fostering a highly engaged, high-performance culture that values equity, diversity and inclusion;

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 25


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

promoting our culture of compliance and adherence to applicable regulatory requirements and risk management practices;

considering effective human capital management practices; and

focusing on strong governance.

Key Features of Our Executive Compensation Program

We have adopted policies and practices to support our executive compensation philosophy and the objectives of our executive compensation program, including:

What We DoWhat We Don’t Do

 The majority of NEO total compensation is performance-based.

 We target total direct compensation at the median, which we define as the 50th percentile of our Compensation Peer Group.

 We enhance executive officer retention by providing a portion of our long-term equity program in time-based awards with multi-year vesting schedules.

 The Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors, engages an independent executive compensation consultant (“compensation consultant”) to advise it on executive compensation matters.

 We maintain strong restrictive covenants in our employment agreements for our NEOs and obtain enhanced restrictive covenants in connection with our equity grants.

 We have stock ownership guidelines of five times salary for our CEO and three times salary for all other executive officers.

 Our Compensation Recovery Policy provides that the Compensation Committee must clawback incentive-based compensation received by our executive officers in the event of a triggering accounting restatement.

× We do not design our compensation programs to encourage our employees, including our NEOs, to take unnecessary or excessive risks.

× We do not base incentive compensation on a single performance metric.

× We do not have guaranteed minimum payouts.

× We do not provide automatic salary increases for our executives.

× We do not provide our NEOs with excise tax gross-ups.

× We do not accelerate the vesting of equity awards on a change in control of the Company or upon a termination of employment unless such termination occurs within six months before or 24 months following such change in control or in the event of the NEO’s death or disability.

× We generally do not provide our executive officers with perquisites or other personal benefits.

× We do not offer nonqualified deferred-compensation plans or arrangements to our executive officers.

× We do not allow hedging or pledging of our securities.

Our Decision-Making Process

Role of the Compensation Committee

Our Board has delegated oversight of our executive compensation program to its Compensation Committee. Among its duties, the Compensation Committee is responsible for approving all compensation for our executive officers, including our NEOs. Although the Compensation Committee considers our CEO’s recommendations with respect to executive officers other than himself, the Compensation Committee evaluates independently our CEO’s recommendations and makes all final compensation decisions within the parameters of our compensation philosophy and objectives. This process includes the following:

evaluating the competitiveness of each NEO’s total compensation, including salary, annual bonus and long-term equity incentives;

reviewing and approving corporate and individual performance goals and objectives for our incentive compensation plans;

evaluating individual performance against these goals and objectives;

26 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

considering any adverse compliance issues when making pay decisions;

approving changes to each NEO’s total compensation; and

overseeing employment agreements, including the renewal process.

The Compensation Committee is supported in its work by its compensation consultant, our CEO (where appropriate) and members of our legal, human resources and finance departments as needed. Frederic W. Cook & Co. (“FW Cook”) served as the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant until June 2023 when the Committee engaged Pearl Meyer as its compensation consultant.

Role of the Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee has sole authority to hire its compensation consultant, approve such consultant’s compensation, determine the nature and scope of its services, and evaluate its performance. The Compensation Committee may terminate its compensation consultant’s engagement or hire additional consultants at any time. The compensation consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee.

A representative of the compensation consultant attends Compensation Committee meetings and communicates with the Compensation Committee Chair between meetings, as requested. The compensation consultant provides various executive compensation services to the Compensation Committee, including advising the Compensation Committee on the principal aspects of our executive compensation program, updating the Compensation Committee on evolving executive compensation practices and trends and providing market information and analysis regarding the competitiveness of our executive compensation program and award values in relation to performance.

During 2023, the compensation consultant performed the following key services for the Compensation Committee:

analyzed each NEO’s compensation compared to our Compensation Peer Group and other survey data, including target and actual pay levels for each component, and in the aggregate, of our total direct compensation (salary, annual bonus award and annual equity grant) and the mix of our direct compensation components (fixed versus variable, short-term versus long-term and cash versus equity-based pay);

provided consultation and advice in support of key executive transitions throughout the year;

reviewed and provided recommendations to the Compensation Committee on the composition of our Compensation Peer Group;

evaluated the competitiveness of our long-term incentive plans, including their aggregate cost, the rate at which equity is awarded and their dilutive impact;

reviewed and provided advice on the CD&A and related compensation disclosures in this Proxy Statement;

reviewed and provided input on materials for Compensation Committee meetings;

reviewed and provided advice on executive compensation philosophy, strategy, practices and policies;

reviewed and provided advice on executive and non-employee director stock ownership guidelines;

reviewed and provided advice on our Compensation Recovery Policy in comparison to market practice, regulatory requirements and to evolving best practices;

conducted a risk assessment of our compensation programs;

provided advice on recent trends and developments in executive compensation; and

provided a review of the Company’s non-employee director compensation program compared to our Compensation Peer Group.

Neither FW Cook nor Pearl Meyer provided any other services to the Company or the Compensation Committee during 2023. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of FW Cook and Pearl Meyer pursuant to SEC rules and Nasdaq listing standards and has determined that no known conflict of interest exists that prevented FW Cook or prevents Pearl Meyer from serving as a compensation consultant to the Compensation Committee.

Role of Management

At the Compensation Committee’s request, our CEO and other members of management attend portions of the Compensation Committee’s meetings to discuss the Company’s performance and compensation-related matters. While the

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 27


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

CEO is not present during the voting or deliberations relating to his own compensation, he shares his assessment of his performance as well as the performance of our other executive officers with the Compensation Committee. Based on his assessment of the performance of our executive officers and the Company’s Presidentoverall performance, our CEO makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee on certain compensation decisions for the other executive officers. The Compensation Committee considers our CEO’s recommendations, as well as data and analyses provided by the compensation consultant (and to a lesser extent, the other members of management), but retains full discretion to determine the compensation of all our executive officers, including our CEO.

Use of Competitive Data

The Compensation Committee generally compares the compensation of our NEOs to the median of the Compensation Peer Group. In addition, the Compensation Committee considers factors such as our financial performance relative to the Compensation Peer Group, the unique characteristics of the individual NEO’s position, and any succession and retention concerns.

To maintain the competitiveness of our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee bases executive compensation levels on benchmarking and information regarding pay practices at comparable companies. Annually, the Compensation Committee determines, with input from the compensation consultant, our Compensation Peer Group, which is intended to reflect companies that are comparable to us based on various metrics, including net income, market capitalization, complexity of operations and business model.

The Compensation Committee, with guidance from FW Cook, changed the Compensation Peer Group for purposes of making 2023 executive compensation decisions by: (i) removing Fair Isaac Corporation, due to its large market capitalization relative to ours, (ii) removing FirstCash, Inc., an international operator of pawn stores, due to the dissimilarity of its business model from ours, and (iii) adding MoneyGram International and Navient Corporation based on various factors making them reasonably comparable to us, including total assets, revenue and market capitalization.

In addition to Compensation Peer Group data, the Compensation Committee reviews financial services compensation survey data reported by the compensation consulting firm of Willis Towers Watson. The Compensation Committee reviews the data related to the Compensation Peer Group and the Willis Towers Watson survey to ascertain the competitive market for our NEOs, to determine whether our compensation levels are competitive and to make compensation adjustments to reflect executive performance and Company performance.

 2023 Compensation Peer Group 

Credit Acceptance Corp.

CSG Systems International

Encore Capital Group, Inc.

Enova International

Green Dot Corp.

LendingClub Corp.

MGIC Investment Corp.

MoneyGram International

Navient Corp.

Ocwen Financial Corp.

Walker & Dunlop

WEX Inc.

World Acceptance Corp.

28 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2023 Executive Compensation Elements

In support of the objectives of our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee adopted an executive compensation program that included the following elements for 2023:

LOGO

Salary

We pay salaries to provide our NEOs with a reasonable level of fixed short-term compensation. The Compensation Committee reviews the salary for each executive officer at least annually and adjusts salaries when appropriate. When determining whether to adjust salaries, the Compensation Committee considers each NEO’s total direct compensation and performance, the Company’s performance, comparative peer and market compensation data, internal pay equity and other relevant factors, including the scope of the executive’s responsibilities relative to peers and other executives, and retention concerns.

All NEOs other than Mr. Sjölund were appointed to their current positions during 2023 and had their respective salaries determined in connection with their appointment. Mr. Sjölund received noa 5% salary increase, effective August 2023, to recognize increased management responsibilities since his last salary increase approximately two years earlier. Salaries are shown below for our current NEOs:

NEO

Salary as of
December 31, 2023

Vikram A. Atal

$

950,000

Rakesh Sehgal

$

500,000

Martin Sjölund(1)

$

500,000

LaTisha O. Tarrant

$

500,000

R. Owen James(1)

$

400,000

(1)  Converted to U.S. dollars from British pounds using a December 31, 2023 conversion rate of £1.00 = $1.2730

Annual Bonus Plan

Each year, the Compensation Committee establishes financial metrics to evaluate Company performance in connection with awards under the Annual Bonus Plan. The Committee determines the size of the bonus pool based on Company performance

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 29


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

against the established financial metrics as well as individual, strategic and qualitative factors. The Committee generally bases actual Annual Bonus Plan payouts primarily on the Company’s performance versus established financial metrics, but also considers each executive officer’s individual contribution and performance, Company strategic objectives and additional qualitative factors that the Compensation Committee deems relevant. For 2023, the Compensation Committee approved the following financial metrics and strategic objectives upon the recommendation of the former CEO and CFO: GAAP Net Income; Adjusted EBITDA (as reported in SEC filings); strategic objectives related to cash collections; portfolio investments from new customers, products or geographies; overhead costs and strategic transactions.

As noted in the Executive Summary to this CD&A, 2023 was a challenging year for the Company due in part to the previously discussed changes in executive officers. During the second quarter of 2023, the current management team under the leadership of Mr. Atal and with the Board’s approval adopted key priorities to optimize investments, drive operational execution, manage expenses and accelerate the pace and intensity of our efforts to deliver sustained performance and create value for our stockholders. By the end of 2023, our Board and the Compensation Committee recognized the impact of our cash generating and operational initiatives on our U.S. business and were encouraged that we appeared to be on track to transform the Company to become more robust, efficient and profitable.

During the fourth quarter of 2023 and the first quarter of 2024, the Compensation Committee examined the financial metrics and strategic objectives established at the beginning of 2023 by the former management team that, as noted above, were updated to reflect the key priorities adopted under Mr. Atal’s leadership. The Compensation Committee considered the Company’s 2023 financial performance and the current management team’s accomplishments, including those of the current NEOs, as described in the Executive Summary. Based on the foregoing, the Compensation Committee approved 2023 Annual Bonus Plan payouts for our current NEOs as follows:

   

NEO

2023 Bonus

Target

2023 Bonus

Paid

Bonus Paid as a
 Percentage of Target 

 

Vikram A. Atal

 

 

$

 

 

950,000

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

712,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75

 

 

%        

 

 

Rakesh Sehgal(1)

 

 

$

 

 

351,010

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

265,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75

 

 

%

 

 

Martin Sjölund(1)(2)

 

 

$

 

 

426,557

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

320,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75

 

 

%

 

 

Latisha O. Tarrant(1)

 

 

$

 

 

351,575

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

265,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75

 

 

%

 

 

R. Owen James(1)(2)

 

 

$

 

 

293,272

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

220,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75

 

 

%

 

(1)

2023 Bonus Target for Messrs. Sehgal, Sjölund and James, and Ms. Tarrant are prorated based on time worked, salaries and bonus targets in their current and former positions.

(2)

Converted to U.S. dollars from British pounds using a December 31, 2023 conversion rate of £1.00 = $1.2730.

Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) Awards

Equity awards, which are made under our 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan (“2022 Equity Plan”), are intended to focus executives on increasing long-term shareholder value, enhance executive retention and promote executive stock ownership. The Compensation Committee generally grants annual LTIP awards in March.

For 2023, annual LTIP awards were a mix of 50% performance stock units (“PSU”) and 50% RSUs, which is consistent and aligns closely with market practices for the Compensation Peer Group. The Compensation Committee awards PSUs to align the interests of our executive officers with the interests of the stockholders by incentivizing them to focus on the long-term goals of the Company and maximizing stockholder returns. The Compensation Committee awards time-based RSUs to retain high caliber executives and reward them for past performance.

The Compensation Committee determines target LTIP award amounts for all executive officers, including our NEOs, based on several factors, including comparative peer and market compensation data for his serviceeach NEO position in the Compensation Peer Group, the percentage of total direct compensation that is equity-based, share usage, dilution, fair value transfer, performance goals for the LTIP award, the Company’s financial performance and retention considerations.

30 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The table below shows the annual LTIP awards for 2023 for each of our current NEOs:

 

NEO

  2023 Annual LTIP Awards 
  2023 PSUs   2023 RSUs 
  # of Units   Grant Date $ Value(1)   # of Units   Grant Date $ Value(1) 

Vikram A. Atal

   0   $0    0   $0 

Rakesh Sehgal

   3,014   $125,000    3,014   $125,000 

Martin Sjölund

   10,851   $450,000    10,851   $450,000 

LaTisha O. Tarrant

   3,617   $150,000    3,617   $150,000 

R. Owen James

   2,712   $112,450    2,713   $112,500 

(1)

Rounded to the nearest $50 to reflect Compensation Committee approved grant values.

In addition to the annual LTIP awards, the Compensation Committee awarded RSUs (3-year ratable vesting) based on competitive market data to NEOs upon their appointment to an executive officer position during 2023, as shown in the table below:

    

NEO

  Award Date   # of
Units
   Grant Price per Share   Grant Date $ Value(1) 

Vikram A. Atal

   4/15/2023    38,779   $38.68   $1,500,000 

Rakesh Sehgal

   9/15/2023    8,208   $21.32   $175,000 

Latisha O. Tarrant

   8/15/2023    22,228   $19.12   $425,000 

R. Owen James

   8/15/2023    11,767   $19.12   $225,000 

(1)

Rounded to the nearest $50 to reflect Compensation Committee approved grant values.

For the 2023 LTIP, the Compensation Committee streamlined the performance metrics for the PSUs by removing the Adjusted Revenues and Adjusted Net Income financial metrics and the Revenue from Corporate Development and Stock Price Appreciation measurements. The Compensation Committee retained the Adjusted EBITDA financial metric and added a total stockholder return (“TSR”) metric. The PSU component is earned and vests, subject to continued employment, based on the Company’s performance with respect to:

a three-year cumulative financial metric (Adjusted EBITDA, weighted 25%) against an established goal for the metric over the 2023-2025 performance period. EBITDA is defined as income from operations calculated in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) plus depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA (1) as adjusted to add recoveries applied to negative allowance minus changes in expected recoveries, both of which are defined using GAAP and reported in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows; and (2) as further adjusted to neutralize foreign exchange fluctuations and for divestitures, corporate development and greenfield activities, and changes in accounting principles and tax laws.

a TSR component is based upon the Company’s achievement of relative TSR calculated over the 2023-2025 performance period using the companies comprising the S&P SmallCap 600 Financial Sector Index; the Adjusted EBITDA and TSR components are independent of each other, and awards can be earned for either component based on the requirements for the component.

 

2023-2025 Adjusted EBITDA(1)

  2023-2025 Relative TSR(1)
   

Performance vs.

Target

  Target Shares
Earned (%)
  Value  

Target Shares

Earned %

Less than 80%

    0  Below 30th percentile    0

80%

   50  30th percentile   50

90%

   75  50th percentile  100

100%

  100  70th percentile  150

112.5%

  150  90th percentile or more  200

125% or more

  200      

(1)

Linear interpolation is performed to determine Target Shares Earned between Values.

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 31


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The RSU component is time-based and vests in equal annual installments over three years, subject to continued employment. The diagram below reflects the various components that comprise the 2023 LTIP design described above:

LOGO

Outstanding PSU Awards

Following the grant of the 2023 LTIP awards, our current NEOs had three tranches (award years 2020-2023) of PSU awards outstanding. The key features of these outstanding awards are included below:

   LTIP Award    

Year

Performance
Period
Measure

2021

2021-2023

Adjusted Revenues

Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted Net Income

2022

2022-2024

Adjusted Revenues

Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted Net Income
Revenue from Corporate Development
Stock Price Appreciation

2023

2023-2025

Adjusted EBITDA

TSR

Realization of 2021 LTIP

In February 2024, the Compensation Committee reviewed the financial metrics for the relevant performance period and determined that Adjusted Revenues, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income awards for the three-year performance period of January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2023, resulted in payment of 78%, 84% and 0% of target, respectively.

Target Adjusted Revenues for the 2021-2023 performance period was $3,066 and actual performance was $2,865 (both in millions). Therefore, 78% of the target shares were awarded to our NEOs based on the Adjusted Revenues component. Adjusted Revenues are revenues calculated in accordance with GAAP as adjusted to neutralize foreign exchange fluctuations and for divestitures, acquisitions and changes in accounting principles and tax laws.

The target Adjusted EBITDA for the 2021-2023 performance period was $3,663 and actual performance was $3,492 (both in millions). Therefore, 84% of the target shares were awarded to our NEOs based on the Adjusted EBITDA component.

The target Adjusted Net Income for the 2021-2023 performance period was $321 and actual performance was $217 (both in millions). Therefore, 0% of the target shares were awarded to our NEOs based on the Adjusted Net Income component. Adjusted Net Income is net income attributable to the Company calculated in accordance with GAAP as adjusted to neutralize foreign exchange fluctuations and for divestitures, acquisitions and changes in accounting principles and tax laws.

Employment Agreements

Effective December 1, 2023, we entered into an employment agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) with Mr. Atal. The Employment Agreement provides for the following:

a term that commenced on December 1, 2023 and ends on December 31, 2025;

base salary remains $950,000;

continued eligibility for an annual bonus under the Company’s Annual Bonus Plan and equity awards under the Company’s 2022 Equity Plan, subject to approval by the Compensation Committee; and

customary restrictive covenants relating to non-solicitation, non-competition, non-disparagement and confidentiality.

32 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Company previously entered into employment agreements with Messrs. Sjölund and James, which are perpetual Agreements until terminated by the Company or by written notice by Messrs. Sjölund or James. Specified severance payments upon involuntary termination of employment without cause or as a director.


Noticeresult of Annual Meetingconstructive termination, death or disability are described in the section titled “Post-Employment Compensation Arrangements” (page 40) in this Proxy Statement.

Other Matters

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We maintain stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers, including our NEOs (the “Guidelines”). The Guidelines, effective as of StockholdersMarch 3, 2022, our Board’s belief in the importance of aligning the economic interests of stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|21



management. The Guidelines were established based on various factors, including executive officer roles, market data, corporate governance practices and the recommendations of the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant. The Guidelines provide that the Compensation Committee may determine whether, based on the executive’s success in achieving the executive’s stock ownership target, to pay the executive’s annual bonus, if any, in stock, rather than in cash.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing the Guidelines at least annually and recommending to our Board any changes to the Guidelines. In connection with its annual review, the compensation consultant and management provide the Compensation Committee with a report showing the extent to which our executives have met the requirements set forth in the Guidelines. This report includes targeted share ownership, actual share ownership, 50% of our executives’ remaining unvested RSUs (which are counted towards the Guidelines) and any surplus or deficiency that exists.

Our CEO is required to hold Company stock equivalent to five times his base salary. All other executive officers are required to own three times their base salary.

Each NEO, other than Mr. Sjölund, became an executive officer in 2023 and must satisfy the Guidelines within five years from the date of hire or promotion. Mr. Sjölund has three years from the effective date to satisfy his stock ownership requirement, until March 3, 2025, provided that he may not sell any equity that he owned on March 3, 2022 and must hold (on a post-tax basis) 50% of all equity that vests until he satisfies his stock ownership requirement.

The following chart details the equity ownership targets established for our current NEOs and their progress towards those targets. As of December 31, 2023, none of the current NEOs had achieved his or her individual equity ownership target; however, Mr. Sjölund is on track to reach such target by March 3, 2025 and Messrs. Atal, Sehgal and James, and Ms. Tarrant are on track to achieve their ownership target within five years of becoming an executive officer.

    

NEO

2023
Salary
(1)
 Multiple Share
Targets
(2)

Equity

Ownership(3)

 

Vikram A. Atal

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

950,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

181,298

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

87,242

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rakesh Sehgal

 

 

$

 

 

500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

57,252

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,434

 

 

 

 

Martin Sjölund

 

 

$

 

 

500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

57,252

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52,966

 

 

 

 

LaTisha O. Tarrant

 

 

$

 

 

500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

57,252

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28,367

 

 

 

 

R. Owen James

 

 

$

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

45,802

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,516

 

 

 

(1)

Salary as of December 31, 2023. For ease of presentation, Messrs. Sjölund and James’ salaries were converted to U.S. dollars from British pounds using a December 31, 2023 conversion rate of £1.00 = $1.2730.

(2)

Based on $26.20 per share, the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2023.

(3)

Includes common stock owned directly and indirectly and 50% of unvested time-based RSUs based on the Guidelines.

Clawback

Effective October 2, 2023, the Compensation Committee adopted a Compensation Recovery Policy (“Clawback Policy”), which intended to comply with the provisions of Exchange Act Section 10D, Exchange Act Rule 10D-1 and Nasdaq Stock Market Rule 5608, which requires companies to adopt a formal policy outlining the recovery of incentive-based compensation in the event of certain accounting restatements.

Corporate Governance2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 33


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Board has delegated the administration of the Clawback Policy to the Compensation Committee, which has full and final authority to make all determinations under the Clawback Policy.

The Clawback Policy applies to all incentive-based compensation received by our executive officers after the effective date of the policy. In the event of a triggering accounting restatement, the Compensation Committee is tasked with recovering in a reasonably prompt timeframe all incentive-based compensation received by a covered executive officer during the applicable recovery period in excess of the compensation that would have been received had the compensation been determined using the restated amounts.

Tax-Qualified Plans

We offer a 401(k) plan for our employees, including our current NEOs, the 401(k) plan is a long-term savings vehicle that enables employees to make pre-tax and post-tax contributions via payroll deductions and receive tax-deferred earnings on the contributions made. Employees are eligible to make voluntary contributions to the plan of up to 100% of their compensation, subject to limitations under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), We make matching cash contributions of up to 4% of each participating employee’s eligible pay after the employee completes six months of service with the Company. Employees are able to direct their own investments, among a range of investment choices, under the plan.

We periodically compare the competitiveness of our benefits programs, including retirement benefits, for all our employees, including our current NEOs, against other employers with whom we broadly compete for talent. It is our objective to provide our employees with a benefits package that is at or around the median when compared to other employers.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans and Arrangements

We do not offer any nonqualified deferred compensation plans or arrangements to any of our executive officers, including our NEOs.

Severance and Change in Control Arrangements

Pursuant to Mr. Atal’s employment agreements with the Company, he (or his beneficiaries or estate) is eligible for severance payments and other benefits upon terminations of employment for the following reasons:

death;

disability;

termination for reasons other than cause;

constructive termination; and

change in control “double trigger” termination.

In the case of a termination for cause, no severance payments will be made. We find each of these practices to be typical among our peers and we note that the receipt of severance benefits is subject to Mr. Atal’s compliance with non-compete/non-solicitation covenants and the execution of a release of claims. In no instance will we provide excise tax reimbursements or gross-ups. For detailed information on the estimated potential payments and benefits payable to Mr. Atal in the event of their termination of employment, including following a change in control of the Company, see the section titled “Post-Employment Compensation Arrangements” (page 40) in this Proxy Statement.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

We generally do not provide our executive officers, including our NEOs, with perquisites or other personal benefits. We encourage our NEOs to submit to a comprehensive physical examination every three to five years at our expense, at a cost of approximately $5,000 each. We cover the cost of a comprehensive physical examination because we believe it serves a necessary business purpose and protects the interests of the Company and stockholders by requiring each NEO to receive high-quality preventative care, thereby increasing the likelihood of early detection for any serious illness that would prevent them from serving the Company to the best of their ability. During 2023, we also paid Mr. Atal an allowance to relocate to Norfolk, Virginia and reimbursed Mr. Sehgal for the cost of his travel from his residence in New York to the Company’s Norfolk, Virginia offices. We believe there are benefits for our CEO and CFO to be on site together, building relationships and trust with each other and their teams, which is crucial during our leadership transition.

34 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

The Compensation Committee carefully considers the tax impacts of its compensation programs on the Company, as well as on its executives. It is the Compensation Committee’s intent to maximize tax deductibility to the extent reasonable, provided the Company’s programs remain consistent with the Company’s overall executive compensation objectives. While the Compensation Committee is mindful of potential tax implications, it reserves the right to adopt such compensation arrangements as may from time to time be desirable to reward, retain or attract top-quality management.

Compensation Decisions for 2024

Salary and Annual Bonus Targets

During the first quarter of 2024, the Compensation Committee reviewed NEO salaries and 2024 Annual Bonus Plan targets. After considering each NEO’s total direct compensation and performance, the Company’s performance, comparative peer and market compensation data, internal pay equity, retention concerns and other relevant factors, including the scope of the executive’s responsibilities relative to peers, the Committee determined that no changes were warranted except with respect to Mr. Atal, whose annual bonus target was increased to 125% of his salary.

2024 LTIP

For 2024, the Compensation Committee added return on average tangible equity (“ROATE”) to the Company’s LTIP as a metric in addition to the Adjusted EBITDA and TSR metrics described on page 31. ROATE is calculated by dividing Company net income by our average shareholder’s equity, net of intangible assets.

2024 Retention Awards

In light of the significant executive leadership changes, challenges inherited by the new executive leadership team and the key accomplishments of the current NEOs, the Compensation Committee granted a retention award of $100,000 to each current NEO except Mr. Atal. The time-based RSUs, which had a grant date value of $100,000, will vest 100% two years from their grant date of March 7, 2024, subject to the NEO’s continued service. The Compensation Committee provided these awards in recognition of significant changes to the Company’s business strategies and viewed these awards as critical to the Company’s successful CEO transition.

2015 Director Compensation Table2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 35


NameFees Earned or Paid in Cash
Stock Awards(1)
Total Compensation
Vikram A. Atal$18,125$109,968$128,093
John H. Fain$80,000$109,944$189,944
Penelope W. Kyle$77,500$109,944$187,444
James A. Nussle$80,000$109,944$189,944
David N. Roberts$95,000$109,944$204,944
Scott M. Tabakin$92,500$109,944$202,444
James M. Voss$80,000$109,944$189,944
Lance L. Weaver(2)
---

Compensation Tables and Information

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to each of our NEOs for all services rendered to the Company for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021.

      

Name and Principal Position

 Year  

Salary

($)

  

Stock
Awards
(1)

($)

  

Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Comp
(2)

($)

  

All Other
Comp
(3)

($)

  

Total

($)

 

Vikram A. Atal

 

      

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

2023

 

 

$

694,231

 

 

$

1,499,972

 

 

$

712,500

 

 

$

155,846

 

 

$

3,062,549

 

Rakesh Sehgal

 

      

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

2023

 

 

$

432,492

 

 

$

458,386

 

 

$

265,000

 

 

$

29,451

 

 

$

1,185,329

 

Martin Sjölund(4)

 

      

President, PRA Group Europe

 

 

2023

 

 

$

481,215

 

 

$

1,020,254

 

 

$

320,000

 

 

$

33,075

 

 

$

1,854,544

 

LaTisha O. Tarrant

 

      

General Counsel & Chief Human Resources Officer

 

 

2023

 

 

$

576,923

 

 

$

765,077

 

 

$

265,000

 

 

$

13,200

 

 

$

1,620,200

 

R. Owen James(4)

 

      

Managing Director Acquisitions

 

 

2023

 

 

$

367,521

 

 

$

480,022

 

 

$

220,000

 

 

$

27,564

 

 

$

1,095,107

 

Kevin P. Stevenson

 

      

Former Chief Executive Officer

 

 

2023

 

 

$

259,423

 

 

$

3,684,317

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,684,920

 

 

$

6,628,660

 

      
 

 

2022

 

 

$

950,000

 

 

$

3,309,927

 

 

$

712,500

 

 

$

12,200

 

 

$

4,984,627

 

      
 

 

2021

 

 

$

950,000

 

 

$

3,249,986

 

 

$

1,425,000

 

 

$

11,600

 

 

$

5,636,586

 

Peter M. Graham

 

      

Former Chief Financial Officer

 

 

2023

 

 

$

405,000

 

 

$

1,473,706

 

 

$

 

 

$

13,200

 

 

$

1,891,906

 

      
 

 

2022

 

 

$

540,000

 

 

$

1,323,960

 

 

$

459,000

 

 

$

12,200

 

 

$

2,335,160

 

      
 

 

2021

 

 

$

520,000

 

 

$

1,299,964

 

 

$

884,000

 

 

$

11,600

 

 

$

2,715,564

 

Laura B. White

 

      

Former Chief Risk & Compliance Officer

 

 

2023

 

 

$

309,615

 

 

$

1,020,254

 

 

$

 

 

$

659,641

 

 

$

1,989,510

 

      
 

 

2022

 

 

$

500,000

 

 

$

916,569

 

 

$

425,000

 

 

$

12,200

 

 

$

1,853,769

 

      
  

 

2021

 

 

$

500,000

 

 

$

749,974

 

 

$

648,000

 

 

$

11,600

 

 

$

1,909,574

 

(1) 

The amounts reported in the Stock Awards column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards calculated by multiplyinggranted in 2023, 2022 and 2021 determined pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718. The assumptions that we used in calculating these amounts are discussed in Note 1 and Note 11 to the numberconsolidated financial statements in the 2023 Form 10-K. Stock awards consist of non-vested shares granted bytime-based RSUs, and performance-based PSUs awarded under the closing stock priceLTIP (see page 31 for a description of the Company's common stock on the grant date.LTIP). The actual amount of compensation that will be realized by a directorthe NEO at the time anthe stock award vests, if at all, will depend upon the market price of the Company'sour common stock aton the day prior to the vesting date. The value as of the grant date of the maximum number of shares that could vest under the 2023 LTIP PSU awards is as follows: Mr. Sehgal, $316,802; Mr. Sjölund, $1,140,526; Ms. Tarrant, $380,161; Mr. James, $285,058; Mr. Stevenson, $4,118,713; Mr. Graham, $1,647,494; and Ms. White, $1,140,526. For more information on the awards granted during 2023, see the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table (page 37).

(2)

These amounts represent awards under the Annual Bonus Plan(see page 29 for a description of the Annual Bonus Plan).

(3)

The amounts comprising “All Other Compensation” for Mr. Graham and Ms. Tarrant represent Company matching contributions to the recipient’s 401(k) plan account up to the $13,200 limit for such plan under federal income tax rules. For Messrs. Sjölund and James, the amounts represent payments under the Pensions Act 2008 of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. For Mr. James, the amount comprises Company pension contributions. Mr. Sjölund has reached the limit on his annual allowance for pension contributions and receives cash payments in lieu of Company pension contributions like other European employees in similar positions because he has not exceeded his annual allowance. The amounts comprising “All Other Compensation” for Messrs. Atal, Sehgal and Stevenson, and Ms. White are below. For a more detailed description of Mr. Atal’s relocation allowance and Mr. Sehgal’s reimbursed cost of travel, see “Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits” on page 34.For a more detailed description of Mr. Stevenson’s and Ms. White’s severance payments, see “Post-Employment Compensation Arrangements” on page 40.

    
   Mr. Atal  Mr. Sehgal  Mr. Stevenson  Ms. White 

401(k) Match Contribution

 $5,846  $13,200  $13,200  $13,200 
    

Relocation Allowance

 $150,000             
    

Unused Paid Time Off (“PTO”)

         $62,115  $24,031 
    

Severance

         $2,609,605  $622,410 
    

Reimbursed cost of travel

     $16,251         
(4)

Messrs. Sjölund and James compensation was converted to U.S. dollars from British pounds using a December 31, 2023 conversion rate of £1.00 = $1.2730.

36 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Compensation Tables

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table presents, for each of our NEOs, information concerning awards under our 2022 Equity Plan and Annual Bonus Plan during 2023.

Name

 

Award  

Type(1)

 Grant Date  Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
(2)
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
(3)
       
 

 Threshold 

($)

  Target
($)
  

Maximum

($)

  

 Threshold 

(#)

  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(4)
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards
($)
(5)
 
          

Vikram A. Atal

   STI     

 

$0

 

 $950,000  $5,000,000                     
   RSU  4/15/2023                           38,779  $1,499,972 
          

Rakesh Sehgal

   STI      

 

$0

 

 $351,010  $5,000,000                     
   RSU  3/7/2023                           3,014  $124,991 
   PSU  3/7/2023               0   3,014   6,028      $158,401 
   RSU  9/15/2023                           8,208  $174,995 
          

Martin Sjölund

   STI     

 

$0

 

 $495,336  $5,000,000                     
   RSU  3/7/2023                           10,851  $449,991 
   PSU  3/7/2023               0   10,851   21,702      $570,263 
          

LaTisha O. Tarrant

   STI     

 

$0

 

 $351,575  $5,000,000                     
   RSU  3/7/2023                           3,617  $149,997 
   PSU  3/7/2023               0   3,617   7,234   3,617  $190,080 
   RSU  8/15/2023                              $424,999 
          

R. Owen James

   STI     

 

$0

 

 $396,294  $5,000,000                     
   RSU  3/7/2023                           2,713  $112,508 
   PSU  3/7/2023               0   2,712   5,424      $142,529 
   RSU  8/15/2023                           11,767  $224,985 
          

Kevin P. Stevenson

   STI     $0  $950,000  $5,000,000                     
   RSU  3/7/2023                           39,184  $1,624,960 
   PSU  3/7/2023               0   39,185   78,370      $2,059,357 
          

Peter M. Graham

   STI     $0  $540,000  $5,000,000                     
   RSU  3/7/2023                           15,673  $649,959 
   PSU  3/7/2023               0   15,674   31,348      $823,747 
          

Laura B. White

   STI     $0  $500,000  $5,000,000                     
   RSU  3/7/2023                           10,851  $449,991 
   PSU  3/7/2023               0   10,851   21,702      $570,263 

(1)

During 2023, our NEOs were awarded the following plan-based awards: annual short-term incentive award under our Annual Bonus Plan (“STI”) and time-based RSUs and performance-based PSUs under our LTIP.

(2)

The amounts represent the range of possible payouts of the STI from $0 at threshold to $5,000,000 at maximum.

(3)

The amounts represent the range of possible payouts of the PSUs from 0% at threshold to 200% of target (maximum). The PSUs will not vest if the performance criteria are not met. Vesting of the PSUs is based on the achievement of goals with respect to two financial metrics (Adjusted EBITDA and relative TSR) over the 2023-2025 performance period as well as continued employment.

(4)

The amounts represent RSUs. One-third vests on each of the first, second and third anniversary of the grant date, subject to continued employment.

(5)

The amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of each award, calculated by multiplying the fair value on the grant date by the number of RSUs and the target number of the PSUs. The fair value of the RSUs is based on the closing price per share of our common stock on the grant date, which was:

Grant Date

Fair Value

3/7/2023

$41.47

4/15/2023

$38.68

8/15/2023

$19.12

9/15/2023

$21.32

The fair value of the PSUs is based on $63.64 per share for the relative TSR performance metric, a market condition, and $41.47 per share, the closing price of our common stock on the grant date, for the other performance metric, Adjusted EBITDA.

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 37


Compensation Tables

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal-Year End

The following table provides information on our NEOs’ outstanding unvested equity awards as of December 31, 2023. No options were outstanding as of December 31, 2023.

     

Name

  Grant Date   

 Number of Shares 
or Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested
(1)

(#)

  

 Market Value of 
Shares of Stock
that Have Not
Vested
(2)

($)

  Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number of
 Unearned Shares Units or 
Other Rights That Have
Not Vested (#)
(3)
  

 Equity Incentive Plan Awards: 
Market of Payout Value of
Unearned Shares Units or
Other Rights

 That Have Not Vested ($)(2)(3)

 

Vikram A. Atal

 

 

4/15/2023

 

 

 

38,779

 

 

$

1,016,010

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Rakesh Sehgal

 

 

5/15/2022

 

 

 

7,863

 

 

$

206,011

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

3/7/2023

 

 

 

3,014

 

 

$

78,967

 

 

 

3,014

 

 

$

78,967

 

 

 

9/15/2023

 

 

 

8,208

 

 

$

215,050

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Martin Sjölund

 

 

3/7/2021

 

 

 

3,337

 

 

$

87,429

 

 

 

10,013

 

 

$

262,341

 

 

 

3/7/2022

 

 

 

6,682

 

 

$

175,068

 

 

 

10,022

 

 

$

262,576

 

 

 

3/7/2023

 

 

 

10,851

 

 

$

284,296

 

 

 

10,851

 

 

$

284,296

 

LaTisha O. Tarrant

 

 

3/7/2021

 

 

 

556

 

 

$

14,567

 

 

 

1,669

 

 

$

43,728

 

 

 

3/7/2022

 

 

 

1,114

 

 

$

29,187

 

 

 

1,670

 

 

$

43,754

 

 

 

11/15/2022

 

 

 

1,079

 

 

$

28,270

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

3/7/2023

 

 

 

3,617

 

 

$

94,765

 

 

 

3,617

 

 

$

94,765

 

 

 

8/15/2023

 

 

 

22,228

 

 

$

582,374

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

R. Owen James

 

 

3/7/2021

 

 

 

890

 

 

$

23,318

 

 

 

2,670

 

 

$

69,954

 

 

 

3/7/2022

 

 

 

1,485

 

 

$

38,907

 

 

 

2,227

 

 

$

58,347

 

 

 

3/7/2023

 

 

 

2,713

 

 

$

71,081

 

 

 

2,712

 

 

$

71,054

 

 

 

8/15/2023

 

 

 

11,767

 

 

$

308,295

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Kevin P. Stevenson

 

 

3/7/2021

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

31,337

 

 

$

821,029

 

 

 

3/7/2022

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

14,074

 

 

$

368,739

 

 

 

3/7/2023

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

2,176

 

 

$

57,011

 

Peter M. Graham

 

 

3/7/2021

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

3/7/2022

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

3/7/2023

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Laura B. White

 

 

3/7/2021

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

3/7/2022

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

3/7/2023

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

(1)

The RSU shares granted vest ratably over a three-year period, beginning on the first anniversary of the award date subject to the terms of the respective RSU agreement.

(2) Mr. Weaver was appointed

The amounts represent the fair market value using $26.20 per share, the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2023.

(3)

The performance component of the LTIP awards will not vest or be awarded if we do not achieve the minimum threshold performance targets pursuant to the Boardterms of Directorsthe respective PSU agreement, as described more fully on page 30. If such targets are met, the number of shares to be received by each NEO will be determined based on actual performance (for each year). For the 2021 grant only, if TSR performance is negative, then the average percentage of the target PSUs earned cannot exceed 100% of target. The PSU award performance period is three-years beginning on January 1 of the year of the grant and ending in three years on December 22, 2015 and did not receive any fees or stock awards in 2015.31st.

38 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Compensation Tables

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table provides information concerning the shares acquired on vesting of RSUs and PSUs during 2023 on an aggregated basis for each of our NEOs, and includes the value realized upon vesting. During 2023, we had no stock options outstanding and awarded no stock options.

  

Name

  Number of Shares
   Acquired on Vesting (#)   
  Value Realized
on Vesting ($)
(1)(2)
 

Vikram A. Atal

  

  

 

$         –

 

Rakesh Sehgal

  

  

 

$         –

 

Martin Sjölund

  

 18,211

  

 

$   759,945

 

LaTisha O. Tarrant

  

 2,335

  

 

$    84,123

 

R. Owen James

  

 5,474

  

 

$   228,430

 

Kevin P. Stevenson

  

 79,393

  

 

$ 3,313,070

 

Peter M. Graham

  

 27,911

  

 

$ 1,164,726

 

Laura B. White

  

 16,289

  

 

$   679,740

 

 

(1)   The amounts represent the aggregate dollar amount realized upon vesting, computed by multiplying the number of shares of stock by the closing market price of our common stock on the day prior to the vesting date.

(2)   On February 14, 2024, the Compensation Committee determined the final payment of PSUs earned under the 2021 LTIP for the three-year period ended December 31, 2023, based on the Company’s financial results and, as a result it is not included in this table.

    

    

The following table provides detailed vesting information of the value realized upon vesting of stock awards:

     

Name

  Award Type   Vesting Date   Number of
Shares (#)
(1)
   Closing
Market ($)
(2)
   Value
Realized on
Vesting ($)
 

Martin Sjölund

   PSU    3/7/2023    8,972   $41.73   $374,402 
   RSU    3/7/2023    9,239   $41.73   $385,543 

LaTisha O. Tarrant

   RSU    11/15/2023    540   $17.07   $9,218 
   RSU    3/7/2023    1,795   $41.73   $74,905 

R. Owen James

   PSU    3/7/2023    2,989   $41.73   $124,731 
   RSU    3/7/2023    2,485   $41.73   $103,699 

Kevin P. Stevenson

   PSU    3/7/2023    41,126   $41.73   $1,716,188 
   RSU    3/7/2023    38,267   $41.73   $1,596,882 

Peter M. Graham

   PSU    3/7/2023    13,459   $41.73   $561,644 
   RSU    3/7/2023    14,452   $41.73   $603,082 

Laura B. White

   PSU    3/7/2023    7,477   $41.73   $312,015 
   RSU    3/7/2023    8,812   $41.73   $367,725 

 

(1)  Final payment of PSUs earned under the 2021 LTIP for the three-year period ended December 31, 2023, was determined on February 14, 2024, after the Compensation Committee certified the Company’s financial results and are not included in this table.

(2)  Closing market price of our common stock to calculate value of shares at vesting is the trading day prior to the vesting date.

   

   

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 39


During 2015,

Compensation Tables

Post-Employment Compensation Arrangements

Mr. Atal has an Employment Agreement that provides for the payment of specified severance benefits upon termination of employment under some or all of the membersfollowing circumstances:

death;

disability;

termination for reasons other than cause;

constructive termination; and

change in control “double trigger” termination.

Depending on the circumstances of the termination, these severance benefits may include cash payments equal to a specified multiple of salary and bonus and subsidized COBRA benefits for 18 months.

Messrs. Sjölund and James employment agreements provide for the payment of salary, bonus and specified severance benefits upon termination of employment for any reason for 6 and 12 months respectively, unless Messrs. Sjölund and James are in breach of any provisions in the employment agreements, guilty of misconduct or fraud against the Company, or convicted of any criminal offence excluding traffic offenses.

Each NEO’s equity award agreement provides that upon reaching age 55 and 10 years of service they may receive a pro rata number of shares based on (i) the number of months the NEO was employed by the Company since the grant date on a proportional basis over the remaining vesting date(s) of the RSU award and (ii) the number of full months during the performance period the NEO was employed by the Company during the performance period and the extent to which the performance categories described in the PSU award agreement are met.

The Estimated Post-Employment Payments and Benefits Table that follows this narrative summarizes such severance payments and benefits payable to the current NEOs. In the case of a termination for cause, no severance payments will be made. Severance payments are conditioned on the executive’s execution of a full release of all claims against the Company. While their employment agreements provide our NEOs with certain benefits upon their involuntary termination (not for cause), the agreements also provide protections for the Company in the form of non-competition, non-solicitation, and confidentiality restrictive covenants. None of our NEOs are provided with any type of excise tax reimbursement or gross-up.

The amounts in the following table were calculated based upon employment agreements in effect as of December 31, 2023, reflect an assumed termination date of December 31, 2023 and used the full year target non-equity incentive place awards. With the exception of Mr. Stevenson and Ms. White for whom we entered separation agreements, the NEOs who were formerly employed by us received no severance benefits upon termination.

40 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Compensation Tables

Name

 

 

Type of Payment or Benefit

 

 

 

Involuntary
Termination
without
Cause/Constructive
Termination, not
during a Change in
Control Protection
Period
(1)(2)

 

  

 

Involuntary
Termination
without
Cause/Constructive
Termination
during a Change in
Control Protection

Period(1)(2)

 

  

 Disability 

($)

 

  

Death

($)

 

 
     

Vikram A. Atal

 

Severance Payment – Base Salary

 $1,425,000  $1,900,000  $  $ 
 

Severance Payment – Non-Equity Incentive Award

 $1,425,000  $1,900,000  $  $ 
 

Pro-Rata Bonus

 $  $  $  $ 
 

Equity(3)

 $  $1,016,010  $1,016,010  $1,016,010 
 

Benefits

 $  $  $  $ 
 

Total

 $2,850,000  $4,816,010  $1,016,010  $1,016,010 
     

Rakesh Sehgal

 

Severance Payment – Base Salary

 $  $  $  $ 
 

Severance Payment – Non-Equity Incentive Award

 $  $  $  $ 
 

Pro-Rata Bonus

 $  $  $  $ 
 

Equity(3)

 $  $578,994  $578,994  $578,994 
 

Benefits

 $  $  $  $ 
 

Total

 $  $578,994  $578,994  $578,994 
     

Martin Sjölund

 

Severance Payment – Base Salary(4)

 $240,608  $240,608  $  $ 
 

Severance Payment – Non-Equity Incentive Award

 $  $  $  $ 
 

Pro-Rata Bonus

 $  $  $  $ 
 

Equity(3)

 $  $1,356,007  $1,356,007  $1,356,007 
 

Benefits

 $  $  $  $ 
 

Total

 $240,608  $1,596,615  $1,356,007  $1,356,007 
     

LaTisha O. Tarrant

 

Severance Payment – Base Salary

 $  $  $  $ 
 

Severance Payment – Non-Equity Incentive Award

 $  $  $  $ 
 

Pro-Rata Bonus

 $  $  $  $ 
 

Equity(3)

 $  $931,410  $931,410  $931,410 
 

Benefits

 $  $  $  $ 
 

Total

 $  $931,410  $931,410  $931,410 
     

R. Owen James

 

Severance Payment – Base Salary(4)

 $367,521  $367,521  $  $ 
 

Severance Payment – Non-Equity Incentive Award

 $  $  $  $ 
 

Pro-Rata Bonus

 $  $  $  $ 
 

Equity(3)

 $  $640,957  $640,957  $640,957 
 

Benefits

 $  $  $  $ 
 

Total

 $367,521  $1,008,478  $640,957  $640,957 

(1)

For Mr. Atal, severance for termination without Cause/Constructive Termination, as set forth in his employment agreement, provides two years’ salary, two times the annual non-equity incentive award, and subsidized COBRA reimbursements for 24 months.

(2)

Messrs. Atal, Sjölund and James’ receive severance payments, as set forth in their employment agreements and all NEOs receive vesting of equity grants accelerated in the case of a change in control and an involuntary termination without Cause or Constructive Termination within the periods that are six months before and 24 months after the change in control.

(3)

Equity values represent immediate vesting of all unvested equity grants upon involuntary termination without Cause/Constructive Termination in connection with a change in control, death and disability and are based on $26.20 per share, the closing price of our common stock on December 29, 2023, of all unvested equity grants as of December 31, 2023.

(4)

Messrs. Sjölund and James compensation was converted to U.S. dollars from British pounds using a December 31, 2023 conversion rate of £1.00 = $1.2730.

Due to the above-described fiscal 2023 changes in our executive officers, we entered into certain separation agreements with our former NEOs, Mr. Stevenson and Ms. White, which provided for severance benefits. Under the terms of Mr. Stevenson’s separation agreement, he received two times his target bonus in the amount of $1,900,000 in 2023 and is entitled to receive two-years’ base salary in the amount of $1,900,000 and subsidized COBRA reimbursements in the amount of $34,336 for 18 months paid in equal bi-monthly installments, which began in April 2023. Under the terms of Ms. White’s separation agreement, she received one time her target bonus in the amount of $500,000 in 2023 and base salary in the amount of $116,669 and subsidized COBRA reimbursements in the amount of $5,741 paid in equal bi-monthly installments from August to November 2023. Mr. Graham received no payments upon his termination of employment other than those paid to employees in similar situations.

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 41


Compensation Tables
CEO Pay Ratio
For 2023, our last completed fiscal year:
the annual total compensation of our median employee was $56,570.
the annualized total compensation of our CEO was $3,275,073; and
the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to our median employee was 58 to 1.
In accordance with SEC rules, we selected a new median employee for 2023. Based on our payroll and employment records, we identified the median employee from an employee population of 3,220 individuals on September 30, 2023. Our employee population included all employees as of September 30, 2023. We included the following pay elements in the total compensation for each employee:
salary received;
overtime pay received; and
incentive compensation payments received.
We identified our median employee for 2023 by: (1) calculating the total compensation using the pay elements described above for each of our employees and (2) ranking the total compensation of all employees (other than our CEO) from lowest to highest.
We calculated the annual total compensation for our 2023 median employee using the same methodology used to calculate our CEO’s annual total compensation for 2023 as reported in the Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement. Due to our current CEO not serving in the CEO role until March 27, 2023, CEO pay was annualized.
The annual total compensation of Mr. Atal for 2023 was $3,062,072. Mr. Atal was our CEO as of September 30, 2023, the date we chose to determine our median-paid associate. To calculate Mr. Atal’s compensation for the pay ratio rule, we annualized the salary he earned between March 27, 2023, the day he became CEO, through December 31, 2023, the last day of our fiscal year. We also annualized his 401(k) match that is noted in footnotes to the Summary Compensation Table. As a result, this amount differs from his compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table.
Pay versus Performance
Set forth below is information about the relationship between “compensation actually paid” to our NEOs and certain financial performance measures. For further information concerning our
pay-for-performance
philosophy and how we align executive
compensation
with our performance, refer to CD&A beginning on page 23 of this Proxy Statement.
Year
(1)
   
 
Summary
Compensation
Table (SCT)
Total for
Vikram A.
Atal
(2)
 
Compensation
actually paid
to Vikram A.
Atal
(3)
 
SCT
Total for Kevin P.
Stevenson
(2)
 
Compensation
actually paid
to Kevin P.
Stevenson
(3)(4)
 
Average SCT
Total for non-
PEO NEOs
(2)
 
Average
Compensation
actually paid
to non-PEO
NEOs
(3)(4)
 
 Value of Initial Fixed 
$100 Investment
based on
(5)
:
 
GAAP Net
Income
($M)
 
Adjusted
EBITDA
($M)
(7)(8)
 
TSR
 
Peer Group
TSR(6)
2023  $3,062,549 $2,578,587 $6,628,660 $1,888,877 $1,602,094 $  764,609 $ 72 $109 ($83) $1,007
2022  $ — $ — $4,984,627 $  462,885 $2,050,507 $  648,867 $ 93 $97 $117 $1,107
2021  $ — $ — $5,636,586 $8,853,857 $2,282,627 $3,251,463 $138 $127 $183 $1,378
2020  $ — $ — $5,536,378 $6,570,289 $2,085,675 $2,390,802 $109 $104 $149 $1,337
(1) 
The following table lists the principal executive officer (“PEO”) and
non-PEO
NEOs for each of the fiscal years 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020
Year
PEO
Non-PEO NEOs
2023Vikram A. Atal, Kevin P. StevensonRakesh Sehgal, Martin Sjölund, LaTisha O. Tarrant, R. Owen James, Peter M. Graham, Laura B. White
2021-2022Kevin P. StevensonPeter M. Graham, Steven C. Roberts, Christopher B. Graves, Laura B. White
2020Kevin P. StevensonPeter M. Graham, Steven C. Roberts, Christopher B. Graves, Martin Sjölund
(2) 
Amounts reported in this column represent (i) the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year for Messrs. Atal and Stevenson and (ii) the average of the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for
non-PEO
NEOs for each applicable year.
(3) 
To calculate compensation actually paid in accordance with SEC rules, adjustments were made to the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year. A reconciliation of the adjustments for Messrs. Atal and Stevenson and for the average of the
non-PEO
NEOs is set forth following the footnotes to this table.
42 PRA Group | 
2024 Proxy Statement

Compensation Tables
(4) Compensation actually paid differs from that reported for 2022 due to a minor correction in a formulaic equation performed in 2023.
(5) Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, the comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2019 in our common stock. Historical stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
(6) Index TSR reflects the Nasdaq Financial 100.
(7) As noted in the CD&A, the Compensation Committee considered various key financial metrics when it determined Annual Bonus Plan payouts. The Compensation Committee selected adjusted EBITDA as the Company Selected Measure. It is an important supplemental measure of operations and financial performance, as it excludes certain items whose fluctuations from period to period do not necessarily correspond to changes in the operations of our business.
(8) 
Adjusted EBITDA is a
non-GAAP
financial measure that is calculated by starting with our GAAP financial measure, Net income/(loss) attributable to PRA Group, Inc. and is adjusted for:
income tax expense (or less income tax benefit)
foreign exchange loss (or less foreign exchange gain);
interest expense, net (or less interest income, net);
other expense (or less other income);
depreciation and amortization;
impairment of real estate;
net income attributable to noncontrolling interests; and
recoveries applied to negative allowance less changes in expected recoveries.
 
  
2023
 
  
PEO Atal
  
PEO Stevenson
  
Average for
Non-PEO NEOs
 
  
Summary Compensation Table Total
(1)
 
 $
 
3,062,549
 
   $
 
6,628,660
 
   $
 
1,602,094
 
  
Adjustments
(2)
 
    
Deduction for amounts reported under the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns of the Summary Compensation Table
 
 ($1,499,972 ($3,684,317 ($869,617
Year-end
fair value of equity awards granted in the applicable year
 
 $
 
1,016,010
 
   $
 
47,621
 
   $
 
346,128
 
  
Year-over-year change in fair value of equity awards granted in prior years that are unvested at year end
 
 $
 
 
   ($
 
1,734,265
 
 
 ($
 
418,727
 
 
Year-over-year change in fair value of equity awards granted in prior years that vested in the year
 
 $
 
 
   $
 
631,177
 
   $
 
104,731
 
  
  
COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID
 
 $2,578,587  $1,888,877  $764,609 
(1) 
For Messrs. Atal and Stevenson, represents Total Compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year. With respect to the
non-PEO
NEOs, amounts shown represent averages.
(2) We do not provide any defined benefit or actuarial pension plans to any employee, including our NEOs. Thus, no pension valuation adjustments were necessary. In addition, for purposes of the equity award adjustments shown above, no equity awards were cancelled due to failure to meet vesting conditions, no equity awards were granted and vested in the same year, and there are no dividends or interest accrued to report.
Relationship between Pay and Performance
We believe “Compensation Actually Paid” in each of the years reported above
and
over the three-year cumulative period are reflective of the Compensation CommitteeCommittee’s emphasis on
“pay-for-performance.”
The charts below show how PEO and Average
Non-PEO
NEO Compensation Actually Paid fluctuated year-over-year, primarily due to the result of our stock performance and our varying levels of achievement against
pre-established
performance goals under our incentive plans. Adjusted EBITDA – our Company Selected Measure – as well as the other important financial performance measures (see table below) were independent directors, no member was an employee or former employee of the Companystrong in 2020 and no member had any related party transactions that would require disclosure under SEC rules. During 2015, no NEO of the Company served2021, leading to higher Compensation Actually Paid in those years. In 2022 and 2023, our performance results on any compensation committee (or its equivalent) or Board of Directors of any other company whose executive officer served on ourthose measures were weaker, leading to lower Compensation Committee or Board.Actually Paid.


Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|22


Security Ownership
2024 Proxy Statement
 | PRA Group 43



SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS
Compensation Tables
Compensation Actually Paid v. Total Shareholder Return
LOGO
Compensation Actually Paid v. GAAP Net Income ($M)
LOGO
44 PRA Group | 
2024 Proxy Statement

Compensation Tables
CEO Compensation Actually Paid v. Adjusted EBITDA ($M)
LOGO
Performance Measures Used to Link Company Performance and Compensation Actually Paid to the NEOs
The following is a list of financial performance measures, which in our assessment represent the most important financial performance measures used by the Company to link compensation actually paid to the NEOs for 2023.
Net
income and Adjusted EBITDA are the two primary performance measures in our Annual Bonus Plan. Adjusted EBITDA and stock price are the two performance measures in the PSUs granted as part of our long-term incentive program. In addition to the metrics noted below, our Annual Bonus Plan also incorporates individual objectives relating to business results, Company strategic objectives and organization and talent. See the section titled “Annual Bonus Plan” (page 29) in this Proxy Statement for a further description of the metrics used in the Company’s executive compensation program.
Most Important Performance Measures Used to Link Compensation Actually Paid to Company Performance
Net Income
Adjusted EBITDA
Stock Price
2024 Proxy Statement
 | PRA Group 45

Compensation Tables
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plan
The table contains information aboutbelow reflects the number of shares as of December 31, 2023, subject to outstanding awards and the amount available for future issuance under our 2022 Equity Plan. All stock awards, including LTIP
shares
, are in the form of grants of RSUs and PSUs. One RSU or PSU, as applicable, converts into one share of Company stock upon vesting.
    
Plan Category
  
Number of Securities to be issued
Upon Exercise of Outstanding
Options, Warrants and Rights
  
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
of Outstanding Options, Warrants
and Rights
  
Number of Securities Remaining
Available for Future Issuance
under Equity Compensation Plans
  Equity compensation plans approved by   stockholders
 
  
866,840
 
  
$ —
 
  
3,838,826
 
  Equity compensation plans not approved   by stockholders
 
  
None
 
  
N/A
 
  
None
 
  Total
 
  
866,840
 
  
$ —
 
  
3,838,826
 
46 PRA Group | 
2024 Proxy Statement


Security Ownership

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

Except as otherwise noted, the following table sets forth the number of shares of the Company'sour common stock beneficially owned as of March 17, 2016 (the “Record Date”) by the NEOs named therein, and April 15, 2024 by:

each of the Company's non-employee directors. Subjectour directors and director nominees;

each of our NEOs;

all of our current directors and executive officers as a group; and

each person known by us to any applicable community property laws, to the knowledgeown beneficially more than 5% of the Company, the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to allour common stock.

Each individual owns directly such shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them. To the knowledge of the Company, none of the persons named in theand has sole investment and sole voting power unless otherwise noted. The table below have pledged any of theincludes shares of common stock beneficially owned by them as security. There are no outstanding stock options and all non-vested shares vestingunderlying RSUs that will vest within 60 days of the Record Date are deemed outstanding for the purpose of the table below.

NameShares OwnedShares Not VestedShares Vesting within 60 Days of 3/17/2016Total Shares Beneficially OwnedPercentage of Shares Owned
Vikram A. Atal-1,740--0.00%
John H. Fain18,3461,937-18,3460.04%
Penelope W. Kyle29,1551,937-29,1550.06%
James A. Nussle4,1681,937-4,1680.01%
David N. Roberts64,8381,937-64,8380.14%
Scott M. Tabakin32,8451,937-32,8450.07%
James M. Voss27,3461,937-27,3460.06%
Lance L. Weaver-1,204--0.00%
Steven D. Fredrickson258,178156,252-258,1780.56%
Kevin P. Stevenson174,42569,829-174,4250.38%
Michael J. Petit109,33448,024-109,3340.24%
Neal Stern41,02440,495-41,0240.09%
Geir L. Olsen21,8851,063-21,8850.05%
All Directors & NEOs781,544330,229-781,5441.70%

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|23


April 15, 2024.

Name

  Number
of Shares
Beneficially
Owned
  

Percentage

of

Class

 

Vikram A. Atal

  

 

74,948

(1) 

 

 

*

 

Danielle M. Brown

  

 

24,415

 

 

 

*

 

Marjorie M. Connelly

  

 

36,060

 

 

 

*

 

John H. Fain

  

 

42,445

 

 

 

*

 

Steven D. Fredrickson

  

 

113,709

 

 

 

*

 

Jayne Anne-Gadhia

  

 

 

 

 

*

 

Peter M. Graham

  

 

53,228

 

 

 

*

 

R. Owen James

  

 

14,195

 

 

 

*

 

Glenn P. Marino

  

 

1,619

 

 

 

*

 

James A. Nussle

  

 

38,765

 

 

 

*

 

Geir L. Olsen

  

 

6,709

 

 

 

*

 

Brett L. Paschke

  

 

17,240

 

 

 

*

 

Rakesh Sehgal

  

 

14,329

 

 

 

*

 

Martin Sjölund

  

 

50,857

 

 

 

*

 

Kevin P. Stevenson

  

 

331,537

 

 

 

*

 

Scott M. Tabakin

  

 

79,442

 

 

 

*

 

LaTisha O. Tarrant

  

 

14,426

 

 

 

*

 

Peggy P. Turner

  

 

14,392

 

 

 

*

 

 

Lance L. Weaver

   33,864(2)   * 

Laura B. White

   18,707  

 

*

 

All directors and executive officers as of April 15, 2024 as a group (20 persons)

  

 

966,558

 

 

 

2

%  

BlackRock, Inc.

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 1005

   6,538,318(3)   16.7

The Vanguard Group

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

   4,292,097(4)   10.9

Wellington Management Group LLP

280 Congress Street

Boston, MA 02210

   3,662,290(5)   9.3

T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc.

101 E. Pratt Street

Baltimore, MD 21202

   2,717,139(6)   6.9

 

* Represents less than 1% of our outstanding common stock.

(1)  includes 40,000 shares held by trust and are considered beneficially owned by Mr. Atal.

 

   

Security Ownership2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 47

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
The following table sets forth the persons or entities known by the Company to be the beneficial owners of more than five percent (5%) of the common stock of the Company based on their most recent filings.


Class of SecurityName and Address
Shares Owned(1)
Ownership
Percentage(2)
Common Stock
BlackRock, Inc.(3)
4,523,6999.76%
40 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
Common Stock
The Vanguard Group(4)
3,645,4297.87%
100 Vanguard Boulevard
Malvern, PA 19355
Common Stock
Riverbridge Partners, LLC(5)
2,724,0255.88%
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402

Security Ownership

(1)(2)  

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SECIncludes 27,316 shares held by trust and includes voting and investment power with respect to shares.
(2)
Ownership percentage is based on 46,327,762 shares of common stock outstanding as of the Record Date.
are considered beneficially owned by Mr. Weaver.

(3)  

Based solely on information disclosed in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2016, in whichJanuary 22, 2024, BlackRock, Inc. is reported as the beneficial owner of 4,523,6996,538,318 shares of the Company’sour common stock with sole power to vote or direct the vote of 4,418,2136,390,805 shares and with sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of these 4,523,6996,538,318 shares.

(4)  

Based solely on information disclosed in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2016, in which13, 2024, The Vanguard Group Inc. is reported as the beneficial owner of 3,645,4294,292,097 shares of our common stock with shared power to vote or direct the Company’svote of 25,533 shares, sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 4,224,469 shares and shared power to dispose or direct the disposition of 67,628 shares.

(5)  Based solely on information disclosed in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 8, 2024, by Wellington Management Group LLP (“WMG”), Wellington Group Holdings LLP (“WGH”), Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP (“WIAH”) and Wellington Management Company LLP (“WMC”). WGH, WIAH and WMC and certain investment advisers are subsidiaries of WMG. Each of WMG, WGH and WIAH is the beneficial owner of 3,662,290 shares of our common stock with shared power to vote or direct the vote of 2,237,339 shares of our common stock and shared power to dispose or direct the disposition of 3,662,290 shares. WMC is the beneficial owner of 3,227,525 shares of our common stock ([8.22]%) with shared power to vote or direct the vote of 2,101,276 shares and shared power to dispose or direct the disposition of 3,227,525 shares.

(6)  Based solely on information disclosed in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2024, T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc. is the beneficial owner of 2,717,139 shares of our common stock with sole power to vote or direct the vote of 103,294988,853 shares held by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, sole power to vote or direct the vote of 2,900 shares held by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 3,539,735 shares, shared power with its wholly-owned subsidiary, Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, to dispose or direct the disposition of 103,294 shares and shared power with its wholly-owned subsidiary, Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., to dispose or direct the disposition of 2,400 shares.

(5)
Based on information in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 1, 2016, in which Riverbridge Partners LLC is reported as the beneficial owner of 2,724,025 shares of the Company’s common stock with sole power to vote or direct the vote of 2,231,396 shares and with sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of these 2,724,0252,717,139 shares.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s executive officers and directors as well as persons who beneficially own ten percent (10%) or more of the Company’s common stock to file initial reports of ownership and changes in ownership of such common stock with the SEC and NASDAQ. As a practical matter, the Company typically assists its directors and NEOs with these transactions by completing and filing Section 16 reports on their behalf. The Company also reviews executive officers and directors’ questionnaires and written representations. Based on a review of the Section 16 reports filed by the Company on behalf of its directors and executive officers or furnished to the Company by beneficial owners of 10% or more of its common stock (if applicable) and a review of written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company believes that all such filing requirements of its directors and executive officers were complied with during 20152023 except the following filings (i)one Form 4 filingsfiling on November 15, 2023 for Steven D. Fredrickson, Kevin P. Stevenson, Judith S. Scott, Peter K. McCammon, Neal Stern, Michael J. Petit, Christopher B. Graves and Geir L. OlsenLaTisha O. Tarrant with respect to transactionsone transaction to withhold shares to cover estimated taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units granted on February 5, 2015; (ii) Form 4 for Michael J. PetitNovember 15, 2022.

48 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement


Voting Instructions and Other Information

Shares of our common stock may be held directly in your own name (in which case you are considered the “record holder”) or may be held beneficially through a broker, bank or other nominee in street name (in which case you are considered the “beneficial owner”). Summarized below are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

Record Holder – If your shares are registered directly in your name with Continental Stock Transfer & Trust, our transfer agent, you are considered the stockholder of record, or record holder, with respect to a transaction on March 31, 2015; (iii) Form 4 for David N. Roberts with respect to a transaction on May 29, 2015; (iv) Form 3 for Vikram A. Atal with respect to a transaction on August 4, 2015; (v) Form 3 filings for Steven C. Roberts, Tikendra Patelthose shares, and Martin Sjolund with respect to transactions on October 22, 2015; and (vi) Form 4 for Martin Sjölund with respect to a transaction on December 28, 2015. Each of these reports was subsequently filed withwe are providing the SEC.



Notice of Annual MeetingInternet Availability of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|24


Proposal 2: Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

PursuantMaterials directly to Section 14A ofyou. As the Exchange Act, the Company's stockholders are being asked to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's NEOs as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, including the CD&A, the Summary Compensation Table and related tables and disclosures. This vote provides stockholders with the opportunity to express their positive or negative vote on the Company's overall executive compensation program, policies and procedures. Our Board believes that annual advisory votes on a resolution to approve NEO compensation will allow the Company’s stockholders to provide more regular input to the Company on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in our Proxy Statements.
An objective of the Company is to retain highly qualified and talented executives and to provide appropriate incentives to encourage their high performance, which creates value for the Company's stockholders. As described in detail in this Proxy Statement, the Company seeks to closely align the interests of its NEOs with the interests of its stockholders and appropriately reward executive performance while avoiding the encouragement of unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. Stockholders are encouraged to read this Proxy Statement’s CD&A for a more detailed discussion of the Company's executive compensation programs, philosophy and principles. A vote on this matter will not address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of the Company's NEOs. Accordingly, stockholders are asked to indicate their support for the Company’s compensation of its NEOs by casting their votes "FOR" the compensation of the NEOs whose names are listed in the Summary Compensation Table on page 44 herein, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, including the CD&A, the Summary Compensation Table and related compensation tables and narrative.
As noted above, this vote is advisory and non-binding, but will provide information to the Company and the Compensation Committee regarding stockholder sentiment about the Company's executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices, which the Compensation Committee will be able to consider when determining executive compensation for the remainder of 2016 and beyond. The Compensation Committee values the opinions of its stockholders and will take into consideration any concerns they may raise (in the event there is any significant vote against the executive officer compensation as described in this Proxy Statement) when making future executive compensation decisions.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL, ON A NON-BINDING ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|25


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This CD&A, including the Summary Compensation Table and related compensation tables and narratives, is intended to provide all of the necessary and relevant information to assist in your voting decision to approve our NEOs’ 2015 compensation. In light of the stockholder support of our NEOs’ compensation during 2014 at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Committee concluded that no significant revisions were necessary to our compensation program for our NEOs.
2015 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
During 2015, we had the following accomplishments:
In 2015, net income was $167.9 million, or $3.47 per diluted earnings per share (EPS), compared with $176.5 million, or $3.50 per diluted share in 2014;
Total revenues were $942.0 million in 2015, an increase of $61.0 million, or 7%, compared to total revenues of $881.0 million in 2014;
A record level of $1,539.5 million in cash collections, an increase of 12% over 2014;
We increased portfolio acquisitions to $963.8 million in 2015, up 37% from 2014 levels of $705.1 million (excludes the purchase of Aktiv); and
Average return on equity (ROE) was 20%.
Over the 3-year period of 2012-2015, we had the following accomplishments:
In 2015, we experienced a net income growth of 33%, from $126.6 million in 2012 to $167.9 million in 2015. Diluted EPS increased 41% to $3.47 per diluted share, compared with $2.46 diluted EPS in 2012;
We increased total revenues by 59% to $942.0 million in 2015, compared to total revenues of $592.8 million in 2012;
Cash collections increased to $1,539.5 million, a record level 69% over 2012 cash collections of $908.7 million;
We increased portfolio acquisitions to $963.8 million in 2015, up 78% from 2012 levels of $542.5 million; and
Average return on equity was 20%.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|26


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

KEY FEATURES OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
What We DoWhat We Don’t Do
•    The vast majority of total compensation is tied to performance (i.e., not guaranteed) and salary comprises a modest portion of each NEO’s overall compensation opportunity.

•    We do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking as a result of our compensation policies; incentive compensation is not based on a single performance metric and we do notholder, you have guaranteed minimum payouts.

•    We do not provide our NEOs with excise tax gross-ups with respect to payments made in connection with a change in control.

•    We do not provide across-the-board base salary increases for our executives. Our Compensation Committee evaluates total compensation for all executives and only adjusts base salary when necessary to reflect changes in the executive's responsibilities or in current market conditions.

•    We do not provide our executive officers with perquisites or other personal benefits, except for comprehensive physical examinations (at a cost of up to approximately $5,000 each).

•    We do not offer any nonqualified deferred-compensation plans or arrangements to any of our employees, including our NEOs.

•    We do not allow hedging or pledging of Company securities.
•    We target compensation at the market median (50th percentile) of our comparative group of peer companies; we use median as the beginning reference point and the Compensation Committee then adjusts pay based on a comprehensive review of performance.

•    A portion of executives' target compensation is earned based on PRA's relative stock performance against our comparative group of peer companies and the NASDAQ index.

•    We have stock ownership guidelines for our CEO at five times base salary; EVPs at three times base salary and SVPs at one time base salary.

•    We enhance executive officer retention by providing a portion of our long-term equity program in time-based awards with multi-year vesting schedules.

•    Our Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors, engages an independent compensation consultant.

•    We have adopted "double trigger" vesting for time-based equity awards following a change in control.

2015 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS
The Compensation Committee believes that the compensation programs and performance incentives in place in 2015, as more fully described herein, contributed to the achievement of the Company's financial and operational outcomes. The total compensation paid to the Company's NEOs in 2015 reflects the Compensation Committee's recognition of their contributions to the Company's financial performance. In 2015, with input from FW Cook, the Company took the following compensation actions:

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|27


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Increased the base salaries of our NEOs to be more consistent with the market median, while taking individual performance into consideration, and adjusted the base salaries of Mr. Stevenson and Mr. Stern in connection with their promotions;
Approved 2014 annual bonus in line with year-over-year company performance;
Updated several important Compensation Committee documents, including the charter, the philosophy, committee self-appraisal, and compensation risk assessment, to ensure they remained current with our pay practices, our growing business, and our corporate governance best practices; and
Approved grants of long-term equity awards under the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Program, taking into consideration market median, Company and individual performance, anticipated contributions, and executive retention concerns.
In January 2016, with input from FW Cook, the Compensation Committee took the following actions:
Approved 2015 annual bonus in line with year-over-year company performance;
Approved the Company’s 2016 compensation program, including base salary increases for Messrs. Stevenson and Stern, annual bonus targets and long-term equity incentive grants. These decisions took into consideration market median, Company and individual performance, expected future contributions, and executive retention; and
Approved minor adjustments to elements of the director compensation program.
2015 Corporate Governance Highlights as Related to the Compensation Committee
We strive to maintain good governance standards with regard to our executive compensation policies and practices. The following practices were in effect during 2015:
The Compensation Committee is composed solely of independent directors;
The Compensation Committee has established methods to communicate with stockholders regarding their views on our executive compensation program as described in the Communication with Directors section as found on page 57 in this Proxy Statement;
The Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, FW Cook, is retained directly by the Compensation Committee and performs no other services for the Company;
The Compensation Committee conducts an annual review and approval of our compensation strategy and programs, and assesses the risks of these programs. This work is done to reduce the likelihood that any of our compensation programs will have any adverse or counterproductive effect on the Company, in either the short-term or the long-term;
We maintain stock ownership guidelines for our NEOs and progress towards those guidelines is monitored annually. The Compensation Committee reserves the right to pay out cash bonusesvote during the Annual Meeting or to grant your voting proxy to the persons designated by us or a person you select.

Beneficial Owner – If your shares are held in equity ina stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the event that an NEO has not made significant progress towards meeting or exceeding the established guidelines;

Our NEOs do not receive perquisites other than reimbursement for a comprehensive physical examination once every five years;
We do not provide excise tax gross-ups to our NEOs in the event of a change in control of ownership or the Company, and our NEOs are not entitled to accelerated vesting of their equity awards on a change in controlbeneficial owner of the Company or upon a termination of employment unless such termination occurs within six months before or 24 months following such changeshares held in control or instreet name, and you have been provided the event of the NEO’s death; and
PRA maintains a strict anti-hedging policy and prohibits NEOs from pledging PRA stock.

Notice of Annual MeetingInternet Availability of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|28


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM
Our compensation philosophy is to align our NEOs pay with performance, while ensuring that our executive compensation is attractive, flexible, market based and closely synchronized with the interests of our stockholders. Our compensation objectives are to attract, hire, and retain the caliber of executive officers necessary to deliver sustained high performance to our stockholders and to ensure that our compensation programs pay for performance; mandate that compliance-related issues are not rewarded; reward both short- and long-term performance; align our pay programs with stockholder interests and our business strategies; and take corporate governance best practices into consideration. Our executive compensation program is an important component in each of these compensation goals. Equally important, we view compensation practices as a means for communicating our goals and standards of conduct and performance and for motivating and rewarding employees in relation to their achievements. Within this framework, we observe the following principles:
Attract, retain, and motivate highly skilled executives: We believe our NEOs should be provided compensation and benefits that are competitive with those providedMaterials or voting instruction card by our Compensation Peer Group, which permit us to hire and retain top caliber individuals;
Create commonality of interest between management and stockholders: We believe we do this by tying a significant portion of realized compensation directly to changes in our stock value;
Drive the attainment of short-term and long-term financial and strategic objectives: Our compensation programs are built to link directly to our short- and long-term performance goals. Our bonus plan is directly tied to annual performance and our long-term incentive program is designed to focus on a three-year performance and retention period; and
Be performance-based, with variable pay constituting a significant portion of total compensation: A significant portion of the annual compensation of our NEOs should vary with annual business performance and each individual’s contribution to that performance. All pay-for-performance decisions also take into consideration compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and we would not reward our NEOs for performance in instances where compliance issues may exist.
PRA believes that our executive compensation motivates future performance and is linked, directly and materially, to the Company's overall performance and each NEOs individual performance. The following outlines how we make compensation decisions.
Role of the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee, which in 2015, was comprised of three independent directors, is responsible to our Board for overseeing our executive compensation policies and programs. Among its duties, the Compensation Committee is responsible for formulating the compensation recommendations for our CEO and approving all compensation for the CEO’s direct reports (including the other NEOs). Although the Compensation Committee considers the CEO’s recommendations, the Compensation Committee independently evaluates the CEO’s recommendations and makes all final compensation decisions within the parameters of its compensation philosophy. This includes the following:
Evaluating the competitiveness of each NEO’s total compensation package including base pay, annual bonus and long-term equity incentives;
��Reviewing and approving corporate and individual incentive goals and objectives;
Evaluating individual performance results in light of these goals and objectives;
Ensuring no compliance issues exist when making pay decisions;
Approving any changes to our NEOs’ total compensation packages; and
Overseeing employment agreements, including the renewal process.
The Compensation Committee is supported in its work by FW Cook, the CEO (where appropriate), and the Chief Human Resources Officer and her staff.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|29

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Role of the Chief Executive Officer
Within the framework of the compensation programs approved by the Compensation Committee and based on a review of competitive market data completed annually, our CEO recommends the mix of annual base pay, annual bonus and long-term equity incentive awards that the CEO’s direct reports should receive as both target and actual total compensation. These recommendations are based upon his assessment of each executive officer’s performance, the performance of the individual’s respective business or function, and any employee retention concerns. The Compensation Committee reviews our CEO’s recommendations and approves any compensation changes affecting the CEO’s direct reports as it determines in its sole discretion. Our CEO does not play any role with respect to any matter affecting his own compensation and is not present in Compensation Committee meetings when CEO pay is discussed. The Compensation Committee may delegate duties and responsibilities to the CEO, as the Compensation Committee deems to be in the best interests of the Company, provided such delegation is not prohibited by applicable law, rule or regulation. Delegated duties include, but are not limited to, the ability of the CEO to grant a specified number of non-vested shares of the Company's common stock to newly hired, recently promotedyour broker, bank or other non-executive officers in accordance with specified parameters.
Role of the Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee has retained FW Cook as its executive compensation consultant. FW Cook reports directly tonominee who is considered the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may replace FW Cook or hire additional consultants at any time. A representative of FW Cook attends meetings of the Compensation Committee and communicates with the Compensation Committee Chair between meetings, as requested.
FW Cook provides various executive compensation services to the Compensation Committee pursuant to a written consulting agreement, which includes advising the Compensation Committee on the principal aspects of our executive compensation program, updating the Committee on evolving industry practices and providing market information and analysis regarding the competitiveness of our program design and award values in relation to performance.
During 2015, FW Cook performed the following key services for the Compensation Committee:
Provided a competitive evaluation of total compensation for the CEO and his direct reports (including the other NEOs) versus our Compensation Peer Group (as disclosed on the following page)and other survey data;
Provided recommendations to the Compensation Committee on selection of companies for inclusion in our Compensation Peer Group;
Provided a competitive evaluation of share usage, dilution, and fair value transfer versus our Compensation Peer Group data;
Reviewed and provided advice on the CD&A section for the Proxy Statement and related compensation tables;
Reviewed committee materials and provided commentary when appropriate;
Provided extensive risk analysis of all incentive pay programs at the Company; and
Provided a competitive review of the Company’s director compensation program versus Compensation Peer Group data.
FW Cook provided no other services to management or the Company during 2015. The Compensation Committee retains sole authority to hire any compensation consultant, approve such consultant’s compensation, determine the nature and scope of its services, evaluate its performance, and terminate its engagement. The Company has assessed the independence of FW Cook pursuant to SEC rules and has determined that no known conflict of interest exists that would prevent FW Cook from serving as an independent consultant to the Compensation Committee.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|30

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Use of Competitive Data
The Compensation Committee does not believe that it is appropriate to establish compensation levels based solely on benchmarking; however, it believes that information regarding pay practices at comparable companies is useful as a recruitment and retention tool, to maintain competitive compensation practices in the marketplace. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee engages FW Cook to assist and make recommendations in connection with the selection and periodic review of companies to be included in the “Compensation Peer Group” (as disclosed on this page), as well as related analysis in connection with updates made with the approval of the Compensation Committee. We believe the Compensation Peer Group represents the organizations that most closely correlate with us and therefore lean toward the business services industry with a focus on specialized finance. The companies who are included in the Compensation Peer Group were included based on certain metrics comparable to those of the Company, principally, net income, market capitalization and complexity. Revenue is taken into consideration but not as heavily as the other metrics listed, as not all of our cash receipts are represented in our revenue numbers. A significant portion of our cash receipts are recorded as a reduction of principal on finance receivables amortization, rather than revenue.
Our NEOs’ total target compensation approximates the median of the Compensation Peer Group. Actual cash compensation may be above or below this range based on actual performance. Realized long-term equity incentives and total compensation will vary from the median based on actual financial and stock price performance. In making its year-end compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee noted that Company performance was relatively strong in comparison to the industry as a whole.
In its review of the 2015 compensation of the Company’s NEOs, the Compensation Committee primarily reviewed the compensation practices of the Compensation Peer Group listed below:
2015 Compensation Peer Group
Cash America InternationalGlobal PaymentsTotal Systems Services
Credit AcceptanceHMS HoldingsWalter Investment Management
Encore Capital GroupKCG HoldingsWEX
EquifaxMSCIWorld Acceptance
Fair IsaacOcwen Financial
First Cash Financial ServicesSEI Investments
The 2015 Compensation Peer Group has been updated from the 2014 Compensation Peer Group and no longer includes Dealertrack Technologies Inc., which was acquired by Cox Automotive. No other changes were made.
In addition to Compensation Peer Group data, the Compensation Committee reviews, but does not place as much emphasis on, the financial services and general industry compensation survey data developed by the compensation consulting firm of Willis Towers Watson. The primary focus on the Compensation Peer Group data relates to more direct matches in terms of company size and business mix. The Compensation Committee uses this data to ascertain the competitive market for our NEOs, to determine whether the Company's compensation levels are competitive, and to make any necessary adjustments to reflect executive performance and Company performance. As a part of this process, FW Cook measures target and actual pay levels for the Company and the Compensation Peer Group within each compensation component and in the aggregate. FW Cook also reviews the mix of the Company’s compensation components with respect to fixed versus variable, short-term versus long-term and cash versus equity-based pay. This information is then presented to the Compensation Committee for its review and use.
The Compensation Committee generally compares the compensation of its NEOs to the median of the Compensation Peer Group. In addition, the Compensation Committee considers factors such as our performance within the Compensation Peer Group, the unique characteristics of the individual NEO’s position, and any succession and retention considerations.


Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|31

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

COMPONENTS OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM
The Compensation Committee measures the competitiveness of our programs by looking at the median of the Compensation Peer Group and the survey data for each compensation component. The Compensation Committee considers the recommendations of its consultant, FW Cook, in the process of allocating the mix of total compensation among each element of compensation, to provide the right balance of fixed and variable, short-term and long-term and cash and equity compensation. The compensation of executives who have the greatest ability to influence the Company's financial performance is predominately performance-based and at risk, which is consistent with the Company's overall compensation philosophy.
Base Pay
We pay base salaries to our NEOs to compensate them for their day-to-day services. Annual base pay is set on an individual basis at the time of hire or upon promotion or other change in job responsibilities. Annual base pay is reviewed annually and the Compensation Committee considers the relative importance of the position, individual experience, skill, level of responsibility and the individual’s performance and contributions prior to making any adjustments.
In 2015, the Compensation Committee made a determination to increase annual base pay for all of our NEOs taking into consideration performance and market alignment; base salaries of Mr. Stevenson and Mr. Stern were subsequently adjusted again in connection with their promotions in August 2015.
Annual Bonus Plan
In 2015, the annual bonus program, last approved by our stockholders in 2013, (our “Annual Bonus Plan”) provided for cash bonuses based on our financial performance and individual performance. The financial goals for the Company were set by the Compensation Committee. Each NEO was assigned an Annual Bonus Plan target established by the Compensation Committee in November 2014. Although financial goals are the main component in determining Annual Bonus Plan awards, individual contribution and performance is also taken into consideration.
In order to align the interests of our NEOs with Company performance, the Compensation Committee assesses Company performance relative to a series of financial measures as well as strategic and qualitative factors to arrive at the short-term incentive pool to be used for the payment of awards under the Annual Bonus Plan. The Committee believes that over-reliance on a narrow set of fixed financial measures for determination of Annual Bonus is not in the best interest of stockholders, as it may result in short-term trade-off decisions not focused on driving future growth. Therefore, in addition to the financial measures, the Committee also uses supplemental criteria to further ensure alignment of actual bonus awards to our short and long-term success.
For 2015 performance, the primary financial metric used to determine the short-term incentive pool continued to be net operating income. We may exclude from income or expenses, extraordinary events that may not have been contemplated or entirely in the control of management. We believe this is most indicative of the Company’s financial performance during the fiscal year and what we want the executives to focus on achieving. Net operating income is the income from operations after subtracting costs and expenses associated with those operations. It can be found on our income statement in the line called “Income from Operations.” As soon as financial results were available, the CEO and the Compensation Committee met to discuss the NEO bonuses, except for the CEO’s own bonus (which is established by the Compensation Committee). The Committee made any adjustments it determined appropriate and then all of the other NEOs annual bonus payments were finalized and approved through a Compensation Committee vote. The Compensation Committee fully determined and approved the amount of our CEO’s award based on similar criteria, without input from or the presence of the CEO. The Compensation Committee evaluated 2015 net operating income against the 2015 goals and determined that the Company’s financial performance had met expectations. The Compensation Committee also took into account revenue growth, growth in cash receipts and cash collections, and the successful completion of acquisitions in 2015.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|32


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Compensation Committee may exercise negative discretion to adjust the bonuses that may otherwise be payable under the 2015 Annual Bonus Plan. Based on 2015 performance, the Compensation Committee did make this election relative to the Section 162(m) plan established at the beginning of 2015.
Annual bonuses granted to our NEOs under the Annual Bonus Plan are designed to constitute fully deductible “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) as further described in “Deductibility of Executive Compensation” section on page 43.
Long-Term Equity Program
Our practice is to grant long-term incentive (“LTI”) awards to NEOs and other executives as a mix of performance-based restricted stock units and time-based restricted stock units in amounts that are consistent with competitive practice and the Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (our “Equity Plan”). These awards are made after a regularly scheduled Board meeting in the first quarter of the year, upon the Compensation Committee’s recommendation and Board approval. The grant date is set at the time of the Board’s vote. The LTI awards are referred to as our “LTI Program.”
To determine individual LTI award amounts the Compensation Committee considers an NEO’s performance during the preceding year, potential future contributions, retention considerations, as well as market data for each NEO’s position in the Compensation Peer Group.
Our 2015 LTI Program remained consistent in design with our 2014 LTI Program, focusing on three key elements, each representing one-third of the total award: (i) continued Company service, (ii) return on equity (“ROE”), and (iii) total stockholder return (“TSR”). Each component is independent of the others and awards can be earned in any of these categories based on the requirements within that category.
The continued Company service element is reflected in a time-based restricted stock unit grant that vests ratably over three years. This element is incorporated to retain high caliber executives and reward them for past performance;
The ROE component is based on the extent that the Company achieves a three-year annualized ROE goal, calculated quarterly over the ROE 2015-2017 performance period. The Compensation Committee believes ROE is a good long-term measure that NEOs should be measured against when evaluating the sustained profitability of the Company; and
The TSR component is based upon the Company’s achievement of relative total stockholder returns calculated over 2015-2017 using as a comparison group the NASDAQ Composite Index (one-half weighting) and our Compensation Peer Group (one-half weighting). The Compensation Committee believes that the TSR component further aligns the NEOs’ interests with our stockholders’ interests.
2015-2017 ROE(1)
 
2015-2017 Relative TSR(1)
ValueTarget Shares Earned (%) ValueTarget Shares Earned (%)
Less than 14.7%Zero 
Below 35th percentile
Zero
15.7%50% 
35th percentile
50%
16.7%100% 
50th percentile
100%
17.7%150% 
65th percentile
150%
18.7% or more200% 
80th percentile
200%
(1)
Linear interpolation is performed to determine Target Shares Earned between Values.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|33


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Special Equity Awards
LTI awards may also be granted when an employee is promoted to recognize the increase in the scope of his or her role and responsibilities. From time to time, we may also make special awards to reward the achievement of major milestones, or selective awards in situations involving a leadership transition. The CEO may also approve grants of LTI awards to new hires at the time of their hire, if under 1,000 shares, in order to align their interests as quickly as possible with our stockholders’ interests. In 2015, no special equity awards were granted to any of the NEOs.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The table below reflects the number of shares as of December 31, 2015 subject to outstanding awards and the amount available for future issuance under our Equity Plan. All stock awards, including LTI shares, are in the form of grants of restricted stock units. One restricted stock unit converts into one share of Company stock upon vesting.
Plan CategoryNumber of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and RightsWeighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and RightsNumber of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders933,092$04,875,051
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholdersNoneN/ANone
Total933,092$04,875,051

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|34


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

DECISIONS FOR 2015
The following section contains information on the Compensation Committee’s decisions on the various direct compensation components for 2015 and information regarding certain performance measures and goals. These measures and goals are disclosed in the limited context of our executive compensation program. Investors should not apply these performance measures and goals to other contexts. The following tables are in addition to, and not in lieu of, the Summary Compensation Table required by the SEC, which can be found on page 44.
2015 NEO Compensation (1)
Named Executive OfficerAnnual Base PayAnnual Bonus Plan
Long-Term
Incentive(2)
Other Compensation(3)
Total
Steven D. Fredrickson$903,846$1,250,000$2,099,879 $4,253,725
Kevin P. Stevenson$522,450$900,000$879,940$250$2,302,640
Michael J. Petit$440,962$600,000$699,854 $1,740,816
Neal Stern$403,925$550,000$474,904$270,834$1,699,663
Geir L. Olsen(4)
$493,556$362,581$699,854 $1,555,991
(1)
Please see our 2015 Summary Compensation table as required by the SEC on page 44 of this Proxy Statement to see full disclosure information including all other compensation, footnotes and narrative disclosure.
(2)
The amounts included in this column represent the grant date fair value on the grant date. The fair value of the RSU and PSU/ROE is the closing price of the Company's common stock on the grant dates ($52.47) and the PSU/TSR fair value ($54.38) is determined using a Monte Carlo simulation as of the grant date in accordance with ASC Topic 718.
(3)
Mr. Stern was awarded a step bonus in 2014, with $375,000 being awarded with the 2014 Annual Bonus Plan and up to an additional $325,000 able to be earned in 2015. Of that $325,000, Mr. Stern earned $270,834. Mr. Stevenson received a $250 referral bonus in 2015.
(4)
Mr. Olsen’s annual base pay is shown in dollars only for comparative purposes. Exchange rate used was €1:$1.0906.
These decisions were based on the Company’s 2015 actual financial results, as indicated in the table below.
Goal2014 Actual2015 ActualPercent Change Over 2014
Revenue$881.0M$942.0M7%
Net Operating Income$342.1M$310.3M-9%
Operating Expenses to Cash Receipts Ratio37%39%-5%
Cash Collections$1,378.8M$1,539.5M12%
Diluted Earnings Per Share$3.50$3.47-1%

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|35


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Steven D. Fredrickson, 56, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
A complete description of Mr. Fredrickson’s qualifications is set forth on page 12 of this Proxy Statement.
Mr. Fredrickson led the Company to another successful year that included the following achievements:
Growth of Revenue of 7%;
Net Operating Income contracted by 9%;
Estimated Remaining Collections grew 15%;
Growth of Cash Collections of 12%;
Milestone settlement with the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CFPB);
Continued growth in European investing; and
Expansion into Brazil.
Compensation ComponentSteven D. Fredrickson
20142015Percent Change from 2014Component as a % of 2015 Compensation
Salary$846,154$903,8466.8%21.2%
Bonus$2,000,000$1,250,000-37.5%29.4%
Time Based Long-Term Incentive$583,322$699,95020.0%16.5%
Performance Based Long-Term Incentive$1,166,621$1,399,92920.0%32.9%
Total Compensation(1)
$4,596,097$4,253,725-7.4%100.0%
(1)
Mr. Fredrickson received a retention grant of restricted stock units in 2014 having a fair market value of $1,000,000 when he executed his new employment agreement. This grant is not included in total compensation, as it is a one-time grant and not considered part of annual compensation.
Kevin P. Stevenson, 52, President, Chief Administrative Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer
A complete description of Mr. Stevenson’s qualifications is set forth on page 10 of this Proxy Statement.
In addition to contributing to the Company’s strong financial results, Mr. Stevenson helped to successfully drive the following initiatives:
Strengthened Core Corporate functions with additional expansion in Financial, Planning & Analysis, Internal Audit and Information Technology (IT);
Ensured funding for business operations by making sure there was access to capital for both the Americas and European operations; and
Increased PRA’s involvement in certain regulatory matters of interest to the Company.
Compensation ComponentKevin P. Stevenson
20142015Percent Change from 2014Component as a % of 2015 Compensation
Salary$428,846$522,45021.8%22.7%
Bonus (1)
$1,000,000$900,250-10.0%39.1%
Time Based Long-Term Incentive$266,648$293,30710.0%12.7%
Performance Based Long-Term Incentive$533,271$586,63310.0%25.5%
Total Compensation(2)
$2,228,765$2,302,6403.3%100.0%
(1)
Mr. Stevenson received a $250 referral bonus in 2015.
(2)
Mr. Stevenson received a retention grant of restricted stock units in 2014 having a fair market value of $500,000 when he executed his new employment agreement. This grant is not included in total compensation, as it is a one-time grant and not considered part of annual compensation.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|36


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Michael J. Petit, 56, President, Insolvency Investment Services
Mr. Petit joined the Company in 2003 to lead the Company's efforts in purchasing bankrupt consumer accounts. Prior to joining PRA, Mr. Petit was Managing Director and Head of the Core and Communications Technologies Group in the Investment Banking Division of Pacific Crest Securities. Mr. Petit has also held senior investment banking positions with Jefferies & Company and Banc One Capital Markets. Mr. Petit received a B.S. in mechanical engineering from the University of Illinois and an M.B.A. from The University of Texas at Austin.Mr. Petit led Insolvency Services to another profitable year, including the following achievements:
Cash Collections of $351 million;
Sourced and negotiated the acquisition of Recovery Management Systems Corporation, which closed in February 2016;
Expanded the European Insolvency footprint in Germany; and
Achieved a profit with the European Insolvency business more quickly than anticipated.
Compensation ComponentMichael J. Petit
20142015Percent Change from 2014Component as a % of 2015 Compensation
Salary$424,038$440,9624.0%25.3%
Bonus$825,000$600,000-27.3%34.5%
Time Based Long-Term Incentive$233,329$233,2820.0%13.4%
Performance Based Long-Term Incentive$466,660$466,5720.0%26.8%
Total Compensation(1)
$1,949,027$1,740,816-10.7%100.0%
(1)
Mr. Petit received a retention grant of restricted stock units in 2014 having a fair market value of $500,000 when he executed his employment agreement. This grant is not included in total compensation, as it is a one-time grant and not considered part of annual compensation.
Neal Stern, 48, Executive Vice President, Chief Investment, Analytics and Operational Strategy
Mr. Stern is responsible for the strategy of our owned portfolio collection. He joined PRA in 2008 as Vice President, Operations, and was appointed to Executive Vice President, Chief Investment, Analytics and Operational Strategy in 2015. Prior to joining PRA, he was a senior executive with the Target Corporation. Mr. Stern attended the University of Minnesota.
Mr. Stern led the Company’s Investment Analytics and Operational Strategy team, which included various achievements:
Achieved $824.6 million in Core Cash Collections;
Through changes to our internal dynamic score and installing a new dialing scheme for manual calls we were able to increase our cash collected per acquisition score by more than 20%; and
Ensured our European Analytics strategy matched our operational practices in the U.K.
Compensation ComponentNeal Stern
20142015Percent Change from 2014Component as a % of 2015 Compensation
Salary$374,039$403,9258.0%23.8%
Bonus (1)
$375,000$820,834118.9%48.3%
Time Based Long-Term Incentive$149,983$158,3025.5%9.3%
Performance Based Long-Term Incentive$299,969$316,6025.5%18.6%
Total Compensation(2)
$1,198,991$1,699,66341.8%100.0%
(1)
In 2014, Mr. Stern was awarded a cash bonus through the annual bonus plan in the amount of $375,000. At that time, the CEO and the Compensation Committee also agreed to additional supplemental cash bonus payouts throughout 2015 so long as Mr. Stern achieved certain qualitative milestones. As a result of this, throughout 2015, Mr. Stern was awarded an additional cash bonus totaling $270,834 outside of the Annual Bonus Plan.
(2)
Mr. Stern received a retention grant of restricted stock in 2014 having a fair market value of $500,000 when he executed his employment agreement. This grant is not included in total compensation, as it is a one-time grant and not considered part of annual compensation.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|37


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Geir L. Olsen, 46, former Chief Executive Officer, PRA Group Europe
A complete description of Mr. Olsen’s qualifications is set forth on page 9 of this Proxy Statement.
Mr. Olsen led the Company’s European business, and achieved the following:
Led record European Core Investing of $458 million;
Successfully led acquisition integration with little disruption and no loss of key management;
Effectively transitioned leadership position to Tikendra Patel, as of January 1, 2016; and
Led record European Core Cash Collections of $343.3 million.
Compensation ComponentGeir L. Olsen
20142015Percent Change from 2014Component as a % of 2015 Compensation
Salary(1)
$474,192$493,5564.1%31.7%
Bonus$492,435$362,581-26.4%23.3%
Time Based Long-Term Incentive$157,740$233,28247.9%15.0%
Performance Based Long-Term Incentive$341,514$466,57236.6%30.0%
Total Compensation(2)
$1,465,881$1,555,9916.1%100.0%
(1)
Mr. Olsen was paid a base salary by PRA from July 16, 2014 forward. The total of $244,702 was annualized for the purpose of comparing his 2014 base salary to his 2015 base salary. Mr. Olsen’s actual base salary was paid in local currency and was converted from Euros for illustrative purposes only, using an exchange rate of €1:$1.0906.
(2)
Mr. Olsen was previously CEO of Aktiv, which was acquired by PRA Group, Inc. in July of 2014. Under the terms of the PRA Group, Inc. restricted stock unit agreement, upon closing of the acquisition of Aktiv, Mr. Olsen received 59,159 shares of PRA Group, Inc. restricted stock valued at $3,549,540. The shares will vest in three equal installments, on December 28, 2014, 2015 and 2016 based upon continued employment. This grant is not included in Total Compensation, as it is a one-time grant and not considered part of annual compensation.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|38


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

DECISIONS FOR 2016
In December 2015, the Compensation Committee established new 2016 annual base pay rates as well as reviewed, and in some instances revised, the 2016 target Annual Bonus Plan award levels. These adjustments were made after reviewing market data and taking into consideration future individual contributions to the organization. The following chart reflects the adjustments that went into effect in January 2016.
Name
2015 Annual Base Pay(1)
2016 Annual Base Pay(2)
2015 Annual Bonus Plan Target2016 Annual Bonus Plan Target
Steven D. Fredrickson$900,000$900,000$1,000,000$1,000,000
Kevin P. Stevenson$600,000$700,000$700,000$800,000
Michael J. Petit$440,000$440,000$500,000$500,000
Neal Stern$425,000$440,000$400,000$425,000
Geir L. Olsen(3)
$496,740$496,740$362,581N/A
(1)
Annual base pay as of December 2015.
(2)
Annual base pay as of January 2016.
(3)
Mr. Olsen’s annual base pay and annual bonus plan target are shown in dollars only for comparative purposes. Exchange rate used was €1:$1.0906. Due to Mr. Olsen retirement in January 2016, he does not have a 2016 Annual Bonus Plan Target.
2016 LTI Awards
Additionally, in January 2016 upon the Compensation Committee’s recommendation and Board approval, the Company granted LTI awards to the NEOs based on its assessment of their 2015 performance and the market data for each NEOs position in the Compensation Peer Group. The LTI awards granted in January 2016 were made pursuant to the 2016 LTI program, which is consistent in design with the 2015 LTI Program described starting on page 33.
The following table presents the equity incentive awards for each NEO granted under our 2016 LTI Program in January 2016. Awards are granted as performance-based restricted stock units and time-based restricted stock units under the program. These awards will not be reported in the Summary Compensation Table until next year.
Named Executive OfficerLong-Term Incentive Program – Time-Based Shares
Long-Term Incentive Program – Performance Shares(1)
Total Shares
Steven D. Fredrickson25,87951,92977,808
Kevin P. Stevenson11,50223,08034,582
Michael J. Petit5,75111,54017,291
Neal Stern5,75111,54017,291
Geir L. Olsen(2)
N/AN/AN/A
(1)
Represents the number of performance shares that will be fully realized only if specific performance metrics are achieved over a three-year period (2016 – 2018). Performance shares can pay out at 0% – 200% of the stated value.
(2)
Due to Mr. Olsen’s retirement in January 2016, he was not awarded any shares under the 2016 LTI Program.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|39


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE SHARE AWARDS
During 2015, the Company’s NEOs had three tranches (award years 2013-2015) of performance-vesting share awards outstanding. The key features of these outstanding awards are included below:
Award YearMeasurePerformance ThresholdPerformance PeriodPercent Achievement
2013Return on EquityMinimum threshold for ROE of at least 14.5%
2013-2015
(3 years)
200%
Total Shareholder ReturnMinimum threshold of at least the 35th percentile as compared to peers (1/2 NASDAQ Composite and 1/2 Compensation Peer Group)
2013-2015
(3 years)
90%
2014Return on EquityMinimum threshold for ROE of at least 14.5%
2014-2016
(3 years)
To be determined by 3/31/17
Total Shareholder ReturnMinimum threshold of at least the 35th percentile as compared to peers (1/2 NASDAQ Composite and 1/2 Compensation Peer Group)
2014-2016
(3 years)
To be determined by 3/31/17


2015
Return on EquityMinimum threshold for ROE of at least 14.7%
2015-2017
(3 years)
To be determined by 3/31/18
Total Shareholder ReturnMinimum threshold of at least the 35th percentile as compared to peers (1/2 NASDAQ Composite and 1/2 Compensation Peer Group)
2015-2017
(3 years)
To be determined by 3/31/18
Realization of 2013-2015 LTI Program
In February 2016, the NEOs received payoutsholder with respect to the ROE and TSR performance share awards that were granted in January 2013 forshares. As the three-year performance period of 2013-2015. These awards were earned and paid based on our actual performance relative to the target goals ROE (200%), and TSR (90%). The final award payments to the NEOs were:
NameTarget Number of Shares AwardedActual Number of Shares Awarded
Steven D. Fredrickson30,93644,857
Kevin P. Stevenson13,41319,448
Michael J. Petit13,35319,361
Neal Stern7,73411,214
 Geir L. Olsen(1)
N/AN/A
(1)
Mr. Olsen was not employed by the Company in 2013 and therefore did not receive a grant for the 2013-2015 LTI Program.


Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|40


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

OTHER COMPENSATION
Tax-Qualified Plans
The Company offers a 401(k) Plan for its employees, including the NEOs. The 401(k) plan is a long-term savings vehicle that enables employees to make pre-tax contributions via payroll deductions and receive tax-deferred earnings on the contributions made. Employees are eligible to make voluntary contributions to the plan of up to 100% of their compensation, subject to Code limitations, after completing six months of service with the Company. The Company makes matching cash contributions of up to 4% of each participating employee's annual base pay. Employees are able to direct their own investments, among a range of investment choices, under the plan.
We periodically compare the competitiveness of our benefits programs for all our employees, including retirement benefits, against other employers with whom we broadly compete for talent. It is our objective to provide our employees with a benefits package that is at or around the median when compared to other employers.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans and Arrangements
The Company does not offer any nonqualified deferred compensation plans or arrangements to any of its employees, including our NEOs.
Severance and Change in Control Arrangements
Pursuant to their employment agreements with the Company, our NEOs (or their beneficiaries or estates) are all eligible for severance payments and other benefits upon terminations of employment for the following reasons:
Death;
Disability;
Termination for Reasons other than Cause;
Constructive Termination;
Change in Control “Double Trigger” Termination; and
Nonrenewal of an Employment Agreement.
In the case of a termination for Cause, no severance payments will be made. We find each of these practices to be typical among our peers and we note that the receipt of severance benefits is subject to our NEOs compliance with non-compete/non-solicitation covenants and, in the case of Messrs. Fredrickson, Stevenson, Petit and Stern, execution of a release of claims. In no instance will the Company provide excise tax reimbursements or gross-ups to any of our NEOs.
For detailed information on the estimated potential payments and benefits payable to the NEOs in the event of their termination of employment, including following a change in control of the Company, see the section titled “Post Employment Compensation Arrangements” (pages 49-51) in this Proxy Statement.
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
We do not provide our executive officers, including the NEOs, with perquisites or other personal benefits, except for comprehensive physical examinations. The NEOs are required by policy to submit to comprehensive physical examinations every 5 years (if over 40 years of age) at the Company's expense, at a cost of up to approximately $5,000 each. This perquisite is provided because we believe it serves a necessary business purpose and protects the interests of the organization and stockholders by requiring each NEO to receive high-quality preventative care, thereby increasing the likelihood of early detection for any serious illness that would prevent them from serving the Company to the best of their ability.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|41


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

OTHER RELATED POLICIES
In addition to the other components of our executive compensation program, we maintain stock ownership guidelines as described below. These guidelines are consistent with evolving best practices and helps ensure that our executive compensation program does not encourage our NEOs to engage in risk-taking behaviors that are beyond our ability to effectively identify and manage.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
In order to further align the NEOs interests with those of the Company's stockholders and assure that management focuses on appropriate long-term initiatives designed to increase stockholder value, the Compensation Committee has established stock ownership guidelines for certain key executives. Ownership of equity by executive officers in the Company serves to align their interests with those of the Company's stockholders and demonstrates to the investing public and to all of the Company's other employees that senior management is committed to and believes in the future success of the Company. The stock ownership guidelines establish ownership goals to be achieved and maintained within 5 years from the date of hire or promotion.
Once each year, the Compensation Committee is provided with a report showing the extent to which our executivesbeneficial owner, you have met the applicable ownership guidelines. This report includes targeted share ownership, actual share ownership, our executives’ remaining non-vested shares, and any surplus or deficiency that exists. The Compensation Committee may determine whether, based on the executive’s success in achieving his or her stockholding targets, the executive's annual bonus, if any, is paid in stock, rather than in cash. The specific share requirements for each executive include shares that are beneficially owned, directly or indirectly by the executive, but do not include any shares that have been granted to the executive that have not yet vested. In accordance with the guidelines, executives must retain 100% of their after-tax equity compensation until a pre-determined multiple of annual base pay ownership is met, as set forth in the following table. In order to permit consistent long-term planning by an executive, once established, these targets are not reset except upon the approval of the Compensation Committee in the event of a significant promotion of the executive, exceptional equity grants, or other considerations. The following chart details the equity ownership targets established for the NEOs and their actual share holdings as of the Record Date. As of the Record Date, each NEO has achieved their individual equity ownership goal or is on track to achieve their ownership goal within 5 years, pursuant to the Company's targeted executive stock ownership guidelines.
Targeted Levels of Executive Share Ownership
Name
2015 Annual Base Pay(1)
Multiple
Share Targets(2)
Actual Share Holdings(3)
Steven D. Fredrickson$900,0005129,720258,178
Kevin P. Stevenson$600,000351,888174,425
Michael J. Petit$440,000338,051109,334
Neal Stern$425,000336,75441,024
Geir L. Olsen(4)
$496,740342,95821,885
(1)
Annual Base Pay as of December 2015.
(2)
Based on a December 31, 2015 stock price of $34.69 per share.
(3)
As of the Record Date.
(4)
Mr. Olsen’s annual base pay and bonus were converted from Euros as of December 31, 2015 for illustrative purposes only. Exchange rate used was €1:$1.0906. Mr. Olsen has been with the Company less than five years.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|42


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Pledging
The Company’s Anti-Pledging Policy prohibits our NEOs from pledging, alienating, attaching or otherwise encumbering the Company’s stock and any purported pledge, alienation, attachment or encumbrance thereof shall be void and unenforceable against the Company or any affiliate of the Company.
Hedging
The Company’s Anti-Hedging Policy prohibits its employees, officers and directors from speculating or hedging their interests in the Company’s stock. Accordingly, employees, and directors may not “play the market” in Company securities by engaging in speculative transactions such as any direct or indirect hedging transaction that could reduce or limit the director’s or employee’s economic risk with respect to their holdings, ownership or interest in the common stock or other securities of the Company, including without limitation, outstanding stock options, stock appreciation rights or other compensation awards the value of which are derived from, make reference to or are based on the value or market price of common stock or other securities of the Company. Prohibited transactions include, without limitation, same day purchase and sales, prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, short sales, collars, puts, calls or other derivative securities that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in market value of the equity securities of the Company.
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
One of our compensation objectives is to structure and administer our annual and LTI compensation plans for our other NEOs to maximize the tax deductibility of the payments as “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code to the extent practicable. However, while the Compensation Committee is mindful of the potential impact upon the Company of Section 162(m) of the Code, it reserves the right to adopt such compensation arrangements as may from timedirect the broker, bank or other nominee on how to time be desirable to reward, retain or attract top-quality management even if payments may not be fully or partially deductible under Section 162(m).
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee has reviewedvote your shares and discussed the section of this Proxy Statement entitled "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" with management as required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to our Board that the CD&A be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.
The Compensation Committee
David N. Roberts, Chair
John H. Fain
James M. Voss
Lance L. Weaver

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|43


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2015 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth all compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to each of the Company’s NEOs for all services rendered to the Company for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, including equity awards. The Company does not offer defined benefit pension plans or nonqualified deferred compensation plans.
Name and Principal PositionYear
Salary(1)
Bonus
Stock Awards(2)
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
All Other Compen-sation(3)
Total
Steven D. Fredrickson2015$903,846 $2,099,879$1,250,000$10,600$4,264,325
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer2014$846,154 $2,749,887$2,000,000$10,400$5,606,441
2013$750,000 $1,600,010$1,600,000$10,200$3,960,210
Kevin P. Stevenson2015$522,450$250$879,940$900,000$10,600$2,313,240
President, Chief Administrative Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer2014$428,846 $1,299,861$1,000,000$10,400$2,739,107
2013$400,000 $699,866$1,000,000$10,200$2,110,066
Michael J. Petit2015$440,962 $699,854$600,000$10,600$1,751,416
President, Insolvency Investment Services2014$424,038 $1,199,931$825,000$10,400$2,459,369
2013$388,462 
$699,861(4)
$1,000,000$10,200$2,098,523
Neal Stern2015$403,925$270,834$474,904$550,000$10,600$1,710,263
Executive Vice President, Chief Investment, Analytics and Operational Strategy Officer2014$374,039 $999,886$375,000$10,400$1,759,325
2013$350,000 $400,002$700,000$10,200$1,460,202
Geir L. Olsen(5)
2015$493,556 $699,854$362,581 $1,555,991
Former Chief Executive Officer, PRA Group Europe2014$244,702 $4,048,794$492,435 $4,785,931
(1)
Represents actual annual base pay received in the respective calendar year.
(2)
The amounts included in the "Stock Awards" column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards granted in 2015, 2014 and 2013 determined pursuant to ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used by the Company in calculating these amounts are incorporated by reference to Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Form 10-K for the Fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, filed with the SEC on February 26, 2016. The shares awarded vest pursuant to the terms of the Company’s LTI program and consist of awards that vest based on continued service with the Company and awards that vest if stated performance goals are met as well as on continued service with the Company (see page 33 for a more complete description of the LTI Programs). The actual amount of compensation that will be realized by the NEO at the time the stock award vests, if at all, will depend upon the market price of the Company’s common stock at the vesting date. The value as of the grant date of the maximum number of shares that could vest under the 2015 LTI awards is as follows: Mr. Fredrickson, $3,499,808; Mr. Stevenson, $1,466,573; Mr. Petit, $1,166,425; Mr. Stern, $791,506; and Mr. Olsen, $1,166,425. For more information on the awards granted during 2015, see the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table, related narrative, and footnotes.
(3)
These amounts represent Company matching contributions to the recipient’s 401(k) plan account up to limits for such plans under federal income tax rules. Any amounts for executive physicals (the only perquisite or personal benefit provided to the NEOs) have not been included as they are less than the $10,000 threshold under SEC rules.
(4)
Mr. Petit was granted 8,160 shares of Company stock in February 2013 as payment for a portion of his 2012 bonus awarded under the Company’s non-equity incentive plan, which will vest ratably over three years.
(5)
Mr. Olsen was not an employee of PRA until the Company’s acquisition of Aktiv on July 16, 2014 and, as a result, only the portion of his 2014 compensation earned after such acquisition is included.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|44


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2015 GRANTS OF PLAN BASED AWARDS
The following table presents, for each of the NEOs, information concerning awards under our Equity Plan and Annual Bonus Plan during 2015.
Grants of Plan Based Awards(1)
Name
Award Type(2)
Grant Date
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (3)
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (4)
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units(5)
Fair Value on Grant Date (6)
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) (7)
Thresh-old ($)Target ($)Maximum ($)Thresh-old (#)Target (#)Maxi-mum (#)
Steven D. FredricksonSTI $0$1,000,000$5,000,000      
RSU2/5/2015      13,340$52.47$699,950
PSU/ROE2/5/2015   013,34026,680 $52.47$699,950
PSU/TSR2/5/2015   012,87225,744 $54.38$699,979
Kevin P. StevensonSTI $0$700,000$5,000,000      
RSU2/5/2015      5,590$52.47$293,307
PSU/ROE2/5/2015   05,59011,180 $52.47$293,307
PSU/TSR2/5/2015   05,39410,788 $54.38$293,326
Michael J. PetitSTI $0$500,000$5,000,000      
RSU2/5/2015      4,446$52.47$233,282
PSU/ROE2/5/2015   04,4468,892 $52.47$233,282
PSU/TSR2/5/2015   04,2908,580 $54.38$233,290
Neal SternSTI $0$400,000$5,000,000      
RSU2/5/2015      3,017$52.47$158,302
PSU/ROE2/5/2015   03,0176,034 $52.47$158,302
PSU/TSR2/5/2015   02,9115,822 $54.38$158,300
Geir L. Olsen(8)
STI $0$362,581$5,000,000      
RSU2/5/2015      4,446$52.47$233,282
PSU/ROE2/5/2015   04,4468,892 $52.47$233,282
PSU/TSR2/5/2015   04,2908,580 $54.38$233,290
(1)
The amounts reported relate to the non-vested LTI awards granted to the NEOs under our Equity Plan and cash bonuses under the Company’s Annual Bonus Plan. For a discussion of these awards, see “Components of Our Executive Compensation Program.
(2)
During 2015 the NEOs were awarded the following plan-based awards; annual Short-Term Incentive award (“STI”) under our Annual Bonus Plan, Restricted Stock Unit Award (“RSU”) and Performance Stock Unit Award (“PSU”) under our Equity Plan. The PSU is based on two components, Return on Equity (“PSU/ROE”) and total stockholder return (“PSU/TSR”).
(3)
Represents the range of possible payout of the STI from zero at threshold to 200% of target (maximum) pursuant to our Annual Bonus Plan.
(4)
Represents the range of possible payout of the PSU from zero at threshold to 200% of target (maximum) pursuant to the performance–based portion of the 2015 LTI Program. The fair value of the performance-based portion of the shares will not vest if the performance criteria are not met.
(5)
The amounts in this column represent the number of units granted under the RSU on the grant date, one-third of which vests on each anniversary of the grant date over three years.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|45


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

(6)
The amounts included in this column represent the grant date fair value on the grant date. The fair value of the RSU and PSU/ROE is the closing price of the Company's common stock on the grant dates and the PSU/TSR fair value is determined using a Monte Carlo simulation as of the grant date in accordance with ASC Topic 718.
(7)
This column represents the fair value of each award that is calculated by multiplying the fair value on the grant date by the number of units granted for the RSU and the target amount for the PSU/ROE and PSU/TSR.
(8)
Mr. Olsen’s target bonus was converted from Euros as of December 31, 2015. Exchange rate used was €1:$1.0906.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|46


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END
The following table provides information on the NEOs’ outstanding unvested equity awards as of December 31, 2015. The market value of shares of stock is determined by multiplying the number of shares by the closing price of the Company's common stock at December 31, 2015. No options were outstanding as of December 31, 2015.
Stock Awards(1)
NameGrant Date
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(2)
Market Value of Shares of Stock that Have Not Vested as of 12/31/15(3)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(2)(4)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market of Payout Value of Unearned Shares Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(3)
Steven D. Fredrickson1/23/201350,013$1,734,951  
2/5/20148,100$280,98922,312$774,003
12/29/201416,977$588,932  
2/5/201513,340$462,76526,212$909,294
Kevin P. Stevenson1/23/201318,754$650,576  
2/5/20132,929$101,607  
2/5/20143,702$128,42210,199$353,803
12/29/20148,488$294,449  
2/5/20155,590$193,91710,984$381,035
Michael J. Petit1/23/201317,192$596,390  
2/5/20137,114$246,785  
2/5/20143,240$112,3968,925$309,608
12/29/20148,488$294,449  
2/5/20154,446$154,2328,736$303,052
Neal Stern1/23/201312,503$433,729  
2/5/20142,082$72,2255,737$199,017
12/29/20148,488$294,449  
2/5/20153,017$104,6605,928$205,642
Geir L. Olsen7/16/201421,471$744,8294,809$166,824
2/5/20154,446$154,2328,736$303,052
(1)
All share counts have been adjusted to account for the three for one stock split by means of a stock dividend paid on August 1, 2013.
(2)
The shares granted vest either (i) ratably over a stated period, beginning on the first anniversary of the award date or (ii) pursuant to the terms of the respective LTI Program, based on the achievement of stated performance goals. (See page 33for a more complete description of the LTI Program).
(3)
The amounts in this column represent the fair value using $34.69, the Company's closing price of common stock at December 31, 2015.
(4)
The performance component of the LTI awards will not vest or be awarded if the Company does not achieve its minimum threshold performance targets, as described more fully on page 33. If such targets are met, the number of shares to be received by each NEO will be determined based on actual performance.


Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|47


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
The following table provides information concerning the shares acquired on vesting during 2015 on an aggregated basis for each of the NEOs named therein, and includes the value realized upon vesting. No stock options were exercised in 2015.
NameNumber of Shares Acquired on Vesting
Value Realized on Vesting ($)(1)
Steven D. Fredrickson89,624$4,554,553
Kevin P. Stevenson28,210$1,436,511
Michael J. Petit104,920$4,928,121
Neal Stern23,769$1,207,500
Geir L. Olsen20,597$808,410
(1)
Represents the aggregate dollar amount realized upon vesting computed by multiplying the number of shares of stock by the closing market value of the underlying share on the previous day’s close from the vesting date.
The following table provides detailed vesting information of the value realized upon vesting of stock awards:
NameVesting Date
Number of Shares(1)
Closing Market(2)
Value Realized on Vesting
Steven D. Fredrickson01/09/20156,186$56.61$350,189
01/23/20155,156$55.00$283,580
02/05/20154,050$52.20$211,410
03/06/201574,232$49.97$3,709,373
Kevin P. Stevenson01/09/20151,857$56.61$105,125
01/23/20151933$55.00$106,315
02/05/20152,154$52.20$112,439
03/06/201522,266$49.97$1,112,632
Michael J. Petit01/09/20151857$56.61$105,125
01/23/20151,772$55.00$97,460
02/05/20154,793$52.20$250,195
03/06/201522,266$49.97$1,112,632
03/31/201537,116$54.63$2,027,647
12/31/201537,116$35.97$1,335,063
Neal Stern01/09/20151,650$56.61$93,407
01/23/20151,289$55.00$70,895
02/05/20151,042$52.20$54,392
03/06/201519,788$49.97$988,806
Geir L. Olsen07/16/2015877$63.06$55,304
12/28/201519,720$38.19$753,107
(1)
Final payment of ROE and TSR performances shares earned on 12/31/2015 were awarded on February 29, 2016 after the Compensation Committee certified financial results.
(2)
Closing market price to calculate value of shares at vesting is the day prior to vesting date unless the grant is made and vests on the same day, in which case the closing market price of the grant date is used.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|48


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

POST-EMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS
Each NEO has an employment agreement that provides for the payment of specified severance benefits upon termination of employment under some or all of the following circumstances:
Death;
Disability;
Termination for Reasons Other than Cause;
Constructive Termination;
Change in Control “Double Trigger” Termination; and
Nonrenewal of an Employment Agreement.
Depending on the circumstances of the termination, these severance benefits may include cash payments equal to a specified multiple of base salary and bonus (using a three-year average), pro-rata bonuses, accelerated vesting of equity incentive awards and subsidized COBRA benefits for 18 months.
The Estimated Post-Employment Payments and Benefits Table that follows this narrative summarizes such severance payments and benefits. In the case of a termination for Cause, no severance payments will be made. In the case of Messrs. Fredrickson, Stevenson, Petit and Stern, severance payments are conditioned on the executive's execution of a full release of all claims against the Company. While their employment agreements provide the NEOs with certain benefits upon their involuntary termination (not for cause), the agreements also provide protections for the Company in the form of Non-Competition, Non-Solicitation, and Confidentiality restrictive covenants. None of the NEOs are provided with any type of golden parachute or excise tax reimbursement or gross-up.
The amounts in the following table were calculated based upon employment agreements in effect as of December 31, 2015 and an assumed termination date of December 31, 2015. The amounts reported in the following table are hypothetical. Actual payments will depend on the circumstances and timing of any termination of employment. Because the assumed termination date is December 31, 2015, we have used the full year target non-equity incentive award for Messrs. Fredrickson, Stevenson, Petit and Stern in the “Pro-Rata Bonus” row.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|49


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

NameType of Payment or Benefit
Involuntary Termination without Cause/Constructive Termination, not during a Change in Control Protection Period(1)
Involuntary Termination without Cause/Constructive Termination during a Change in Control Protection Period(1)(2)
DisabilityDeath
Steven D. FredricksonSeverance Payment - Base Salary$1,800,000$1,800,000$0$0
Severance Payment - Non-Equity Incentive Award$3,233,333$3,233,333$0$0
Pro-Rata Bonus(3)
$1,000,000$1,000,000$1,000,000$1,000,000
Equity(4)
$0$4,750,934$0$4,750,934
Benefits$22,405$22,405$0$0
Total$6,055,738$10,806,672$1,000,000$5,750,934
Kevin P. StevensonSeverance Payment - Base Salary$1,400,000$1,400,000$0$0
Severance Payment - Non-Equity Incentive Award$1,933,333$1,933,333$0$0
Pro-Rata Bonus(3)
$700,000$700,000$700,000$700,000
Equity(4)
$0$2,103,810$0$2,103,810
Benefits$22,405$22,405$0$0
Total$4,055,738$6,159,548$700,000$2,803,810
Michael J. PetitSeverance Payment - Base Salary$880,000$880,000$0$0
Severance Payment - Non-Equity Incentive Award$1,616,667$1,616,667$0$0
Pro-Rata Bonus(3)
$500,000$500,000$500,000$500,000
Equity(4)
$0$2,016,911$0$2,016,911
Benefits$22,405$22,405$0$0
Total$3,019,072$5,035,983$500,000$2,516,911
Neal SternSeverance Payment - Base Salary$880,000$880,000$0$0
Severance Payment - Non-Equity Incentive Award$1,083,333$1,083,333$0$0
Pro-Rata Bonus(3)
$400,000$400,000$400,000$400,000
Equity(4)
$0$1,309,721$0$1,309,721
Benefits$14,747$14,747$0$0
Total$2,378,080$3,687,801$400,000$1,709,721
      

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|50


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

NameType of Payment or Benefit
Involuntary Termination without Cause/Constructive Termination, not during a Change in Control Protection Period(1)
Involuntary Termination without Cause/Constructive Termination during a Change in Control Protection Period(1)(2)
DisabilityDeath
Geir L. Olsen(6)
Severance Payment - Base Salary(5)
$496,740$496,740$0$0
Severance Payment - Non-Equity Incentive Award$0$0$0$0
Pro-Rata Bonus$0$0$0$0
Equity(4)
$0$1,368,937$0$1,368,937
Benefits$0$0$0$0
Total$496,740$1,865,677$0$1,368,937
(1)
Except in the case of Mr. Olsen, severance for termination without Cause/Constructive Termination, as set forth in the employment agreements, provides two years’ annual base pay, two times the employee’s three-year average annual non-equity incentive award, and subsidized COBRA reimbursements for 18 months. Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Olsen’s employment agreement, if Mr. Olsen’s termination of employment is declared unfair by definitive judgment or unilaterally by the Company, he shall be entitled to severance pay equal to 12 months of base salary.
(2)
NEOs receive severance payments and vesting of equity grants accelerates in the case of a change of control and an involuntary termination without Cause or Constructive Termination within the period six months before and 24 months after the change in control (called, “double trigger” in the employment agreements).
(3)
Pro-rata bonus (based upon actual company performance and the days of employment in the calendar year of termination) other than for (a) voluntary termination by NEO, (b) termination due to Disability, as set forth in the employment agreements, (c) death, or (d) Nonrenewal, as set forth in the employment agreements. Pro-rata bonus has been estimated at the full-year target amount.
(4)
Equity values represent immediate vesting of all unvested grants upon involuntary termination without Cause or Constructive Termination in connection with a change in control, death and disability and are based on the closing stock price ($34.69) on December 31, 2015 of all unvested shares as of December 31, 2015.
(5)
Mr. Olsen’s base salary was converted from Euro’s as of December 31, 2015 for illustrative purposes only. Exchange rate used was €1:$1.0906.
(6)
Mr. Olsen is on an international contract that varies from US based executives.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|51


Proposal 3: Ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee has appointed KPMG, LLP (“KPMG”) as its independent registered public accounting firm, to audit its consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2016, and to audit the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. In addition, the Company retained KPMG, as well as other accounting firms, to provide other auditing and advisory services in 2015. The Board considers the selection of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to be a matter of stockholder concern and is therefore submitting the selection of KPMG for ratification by the Company’s stockholders as a matter of good corporate practice. The Audit Committee is not required to take any action as a result of the outcome of the vote on this Proposal 3. However, if our stockholders do not ratify the appointment of KPMG, the Audit Committee may investigate the reasons for such stockholder rejection and may consider whether to select a different independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the selection of KPMG is ratified by the stockholders, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. KPMG representatives are expectedinvited to attend the Annual Meeting. TheyYour broker, bank or other nominee is obligated to provide you with the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or a voting instruction card for you to use. However, since you are not the record holder, you may not vote these shares during the Annual Meeting unless you provide a legal proxy, executed in your favor, from the record holder during registration for the Annual Meeting.

Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and Annual Report

We are making available our proxy materials and our 2023 Form 10-K on the internet. Instructions on how to access and review these materials on the internet can be found on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy card and voting instruction card. Stockholders may also view our proxy materials and our 2023 Form 10-K on our website at www.pragroup.com. In addition, stockholders may request that our proxy materials be sent in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis, by following the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.

How to Vote

For instructions on voting your shares during the Annual Meeting, see “Instructions for Attending and Participating in the Virtual Annual Meeting” on page 2 of this Proxy Statement.

If you are a record holder, we encourage you to vote before the Annual Meeting using one of the convenient options described below:

Internet

You may vote through the internet by going to www.AALvote.com/PRAA and following the instructions. You will need to have your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card (if you requested and received a printed copy of the proxy card) available when voting through the internet. If you want to vote through the internet, you must do so by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 12, 2024. If you vote through the internet, you do not need to return a proxy card.

Phone

You may vote by calling (866) 804-9616. You will need to have your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card (if you requested and received a printed copy of the proxy card) available when voting by telephone. If you want to vote by telephone, you must do so by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 12, 2024. If you vote by telephone, you do not need to return a proxy card.

Mail

If you requested and received a printed copy of the proxy card, you may vote by mail by signing and dating your proxy card and mailing it in the postage-prepaid envelope provided in response to request for printed copies of the proxy materials. If you want to vote by proxy card, it must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 12, 2024.

If you are a beneficial owner, we encourage you to vote before the Annual Meeting by following the instructions provided to you by your broker, bank or other nominee.

Revoking Your Proxy

If you are a record holder, you may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by subsequently providing internet or telephone voting instructions, by providing a later dated proxy card (if you requested and received a paper copy of the proxy card) or by voting during the webcast of the Annual Meeting by following

2024 Proxy Statement | PRA Group 49


Voting Instructions and Other Information

the instructions available on the Annual Meeting website. If you are a record holder and require assistance in changing or revoking your proxy, please contact the Corporate Secretary at 120 Corporate Boulevard, Norfolk, Virginia 23502 or by email at corporatesecretary@pragroup.com.

If you are a beneficial owner, you must have a legal proxy from your bank, broker or other nominee to vote during the Annual Meeting and should refer to the instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee on how to revoke your voting instructions. If you are a beneficial owner and require assistance in changing or revoking your voting instruction form, contact the institution that holds your shares.

Inspector of Elections

Alliance Advisors, LLC (“Alliance”) has been appointed by our Board to act as the inspector of election for the Annual Meeting. The inspector of election will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do sotabulate the votes cast by proxy or during the webcast of the Annual Meeting and will determine whether a quorum is present. If a quorum is not present, the Annual Meeting will likely be availableadjourned or postponed in order to respondsolicit additional proxies.

Cost of Proxy Solicitation

We will bear the entire cost of proxy solicitation and have engaged Alliance to appropriate stockholder questions.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services
KPMG servedassist in the solicitation of proxies. Alliance will receive a fee of approximately $19,325 plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for this work. We will also reimburse banks, brokers or other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their expenses in forwarding the proxy materials to beneficial owners and seeking voting instructions. In addition, proxies may be solicited by our directors, officers and other employees who will not receive any additional compensation for such solicitation.

Broker Non-Votes

Brokers, banks or other nominees holding shares in street name for customers who are beneficial owners of such shares are prohibited from voting such customers’ shares on non-routine matters in the absence of specific instructions from such customers. If you do not provide your voting instructions on a non-routine matter, your shares will not be voted on that matter, which is referred to as a “broker non-vote.” Therefore, if your shares are held in street name, it is critical that you provide specific instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee if you want your vote to count.

The ratification of the appointment of EY as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm with respect to(Proposal 2) is considered a routine matter. Therefore, the auditsentity that holds your shares may vote on this matter without instructions from you. On the other hand, all other matters (the election of directors (Proposal 1) and the approval on a non-binding advisory basis of the Company’s consolidated financial statements andSay-on-Pay (Proposal 3) are considered non-routine matters. As a result, if you do not provide specific instructions, the effectivenessentity that holds your shares will not have the authority to vote those shares.

If you received more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, you may hold shares in more than one account. To ensure all of your shares are voted, you must vote once for each account in which you hold shares by following the instructions on each Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or voting instruction card you receive.

Stockholder Proposals

To be considered for inclusion in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015.

The following table sets forth the fees billed or expected to be billed by KPMG for audit and other servicesproxy materials for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.
SERVICE20152014
Audit Fees(1)
$2,409,150$2,553,297
Audit Related Fees--
Tax Fees(2)
$3,821$60,155
All Other Fees(3)
$73,491$50,050
Total$2,486,462$2,663,502
(1)
Audit Fees primarily relate to the audits of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements and effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, reviews of the quarterly consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, comfort letter services, and audits of statutory reports related to the Company’s European subsidiaries.
(2)
Tax Fees primarily relate to tax compliance and tax consulting services, as well as the preparation of tax returns in 2014.
(3)
All Other Fees relate to engagements to report on internal controls for one of the Company’s information systems (SOC 1 reports), an annual subscription to KPMG’s proprietary accounting research tool, assistance with voluntary liquidation of U.K. entities and assistance with XBRL tagging for U.K. entities.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee's policy is to pre-approve all audit and permitted non-audit services provided by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services, services related to internal controls and other services. The independent registered public accounting firm and the Company’s CFO periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval policy. During 2015, the Audit Committee pre-approved all of the services provided by KPMG. The Audit Committee has considered the provisions of these services by KPMG and has determined that the services are compatible with maintaining KPMG’s independence.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016.

Notice of2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|52


Report of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibility for oversightpursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the quality and integrity of the Company’s accounting, auditing, financial reporting, internal controls and management processes. KPMG, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, is responsible for expressing opinions on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and KPMG the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Audit Committee has also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussedExchange Act, stockholders must submit their proposals so that they are received by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 16 Communications with Audit Committeesour Corporate Secretary at PRA Group, Inc., and such other matters as are required to be discussed under auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding KPMG’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with KPMG its independence. The Audit Committee has concluded that KPMG’s provision of audit and non-audit services to the Company and its affiliates is compatible with KPMG’s independence.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 for filing with the SEC.
This report is submitted on behalf of the following independent directors, who currently constitute the Audit Committee:
Scott M. Tabakin, Chairman
Vikram A. Atal
John H. Fain
James M. Voss


Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|53


Voting Instructions and Information

Who May Vote
Each holder of the approximately 46,327,762 shares of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock at120 Corporate Boulevard, Norfolk, Virginia 23502, no later than the close of business on March 17, 2016 will be entitled to receive aDecember 30, 2024.

Our By-Laws and Certificate of Incorporation include advance notice of the Annual Meeting,provisions for director nominations and to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting. Such persons are considered “holders of record” and will be entitled to cast one vote per share owned for each proposalstockholder proposals to be considered at a stockholder meeting but are not submitted for inclusion in the Annual Meeting.

Company’s proxy materials pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act. These advance notice provisions require any stockholder of record entitled to vote at an annual meeting of stockholders who intends to make a nomination for director or make any other proposal to notify the Corporate Secretary in writing not less than 90 days and not more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders. As a result, any notice given by or on behalf of a stockholder pursuant to our advance notice provisions must be received no earlier than February 13, 2025 and no later than March 15, 2025. The notice must meet other requirements contained in our By-Laws and Certificate of Incorporation, copies of which are available on the Investor Relations page on the Company’s website at www.pragroup.com. Copies of such documents can also be obtained, at no cost, from the Corporate Secretary at the address set forth herein, or from the SEC.

Voting Instructions and Other Information

50 PRA Group |  2024 Proxy Statement
Matters to be presented


Voting Instructions and Other Information

Other Information

You may request printed copies of this Proxy Statement and our 2023 Form 10-K by contacting our Investor Relations department at the following address:

PRA Group, Inc.

Attn: Investor Relations

120 Corporate Boulevard

Norfolk, VA 23502

This Proxy Statement, our 2023 Form 10-K and other filings made by the Company with the SEC may also be obtained from the SEC’s EDGAR database at www.sec.gov. Additionally, our Certificate of Incorporation, By-Laws, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Conduct, written charters for each of our Board’s standing Committees, Human Rights Statement, Political Contribution Statement, Environmental and Sustainability Statement and ESG information can be found on the Investor Relations page of our website at www.pragroup.com.

Stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in reliance on the SEC’s universal proxy rule for director nominees submitted under the advance notice requirements of our By-Laws must comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19(b) of the Exchange Act, including a statement that the stockholder intends to solicit the holders of shares representing at least 67% of the voting power of shares entitled to vote on the election of directors.

Other Matters to be Presented

We are not aware of any matters to be presented at the meeting other than those described in this Proxy Statement. If any matters not described in this Proxy Statement are properly presented at the meeting, the proxies will use their own judgment to determine how to vote your shares. If the meeting is adjourned or postponed, the proxies can vote your shares at the adjournment or postponement as well.

Costs of2024 Proxy SolicitationStatement | PRA Group 51


The Company will bear the entire cost of

LOGO


LOGO

PRA Group Proxy Card This proxy solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing, and mailing of this Proxy Statement, the proxy card, the 2015 Annual Report to Stockholders, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and any additional solicitation materials sentis solicited by the Company to stockholders, brokers, banks and other institutions. In addition, proxies may be solicited by directors, officers and other employeesBoard of the Company who will not receive any additional compensationDirectors of PRA Group, Inc. for such solicitation.

Attending the Annual Meeting
If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting and wish to vote your shares in person, you will be asked to present valid government-issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license, in order to gain admission. If you are a holder of record, you will need to bring with you your proxy card or other documentation showing that you owned shares of the Company’s common stock on the Record Date. You will not be able to vote your sharesuse at the Annual Meeting without aof Stockholders being held at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time on June 13, 2024 (the “Annual Meeting”). By signing this proxy, card or such other documentation. If you require special assistance duehereby revoke all prior proxies and appoint LaTisha O. Tarrant and Christina Branch, each of them, separately, true and lawful attorneys, with the powers you would possess if personally present, and with full power of substitution, and you hereby authorize each of them to a disability or other reasons, please notify the Corporate Secretary in writing at 140 Corporate Boulevard, Norfolk, Virginia 23502, Attention: Judith S. Scott, Corporate Secretaryrepresent and Counsel, or by email at jsscott@pragroup.com.
If yourto vote all shares are held by a broker, bank or other similar organization,that you are the beneficial owner of the shares, but not the record holder; therefore, you must bring one of the following with you to the Annual Meeting: the proxy card; the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials; any voting instruction form that is sent to you; or your most recent brokerage statement or a letter from your broker, bank or other similar organization indicating that you beneficially owned the shares of common stock as of the Record Date. We can use this information to verify your beneficial ownership of common stock in order to admit you to the Annual Meeting. If you intendentitled to vote at the Annual Meeting you will also need to bring to the Annual Meeting a proxy from your broker, bank or other similar organization that authorizes you to vote the shares that the holder of record holds for you in its name.
Revoking Your Proxy
You may change or revoke your proxybe held virtually at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time on June 13, 2024 and at any time before it is voted atadjournment or postponement thereof, on the Annual Meeting by sending a written noticeproposals on the reverse side. Receipt of revocationthe Notice of your proxy to the Corporate Secretary so that it is received before the completion of voting at the Annual Meeting. You may also attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, unless you are a beneficial owner, without a legal proxy. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not in and of itself revoke your proxy. In order to revoke your proxy, you must also notify the Corporate Secretary of your intent to vote in person, and then vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. If you require assistance in changing or revoking your proxy, please contact the Corporate Secretary at 140 Corporate Boulevard, Norfolk, Virginia 23502, Attention: Judith S. Scott, Corporate Secretary and Counsel, or by email at jsscott@pragroup.com.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|54


Voting Instructions and Information

Quorum and How Votes Are Counted
A quorumStatement is requiredhereby acknowledged. You are encouraged to transact business atspecify your choices by marking the Annual Meeting. A majority of holdersappropriate boxes ON THE REVERSE SIDE. Your shares cannot be voted unless you sign, date and return this card, or vote your shares by using any of the issued and outstanding shares of common stockmeans described on the reverse side. If this proxy is executed but no instruction is given, the votes entitled to be cast by the undersigned will be cast “FOR” each of the Company entitled to vote, who are representednominees for director listed in person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum. AbstentionsProposal 1 and broker non-votes, which are explained below, are included in determining whether a quorum is present. Alliance Advisors has been appointed by the Board to act as the inspector of election. The inspector of election will tabulate the votes cast by proxy or in person“FOR” Proposals 2 and 3 at the Annual Meeting and will determine whether a quorum is present. In the eventany adjournment or postponement thereof. The proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion with respect to such other matters that a quorum is not present,may properly come before the Annual Meeting will likelyor any adjournment or postponement thereof. As of April 29, 2024 (the approximate date of this mailing), PRA Group, Inc. does not know of any such other matters to be adjournedpresented at the Annual Meeting. (CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE) PLEASE DETACH ALONG PERFORATED LINE AND MAIL IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED. All stockholders who wish to attend the Virtual Meeting must register by June 12, 2024 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at: http://viewproxy.com/PRAGroup/2024/htype.asp Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the PRA Group, Inc. Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 13, 2024.Our Proxy Statement and our 2023 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at: www.viewproxy.com/PRAGroup/2024


LOGO

Please mark your votes in blue or postponedblack ink like this The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of each director nominee listed in order to solicit additional proxies.

Voting Your Proxy
Shares represented by proxy will be voted as directed onProposal 1 and FOR Proposals 2 and 3. 1. Election of Directors Nominees for the proxy form and, if no direction is given, will be voted as follows:
1.
FOR” the election of each of the nominees named in this Proxy Statement to the Board for a term of three years;
2.
FOR” the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s NEOs; and
3.
FOR” the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for Fiscal year 2016;
4.In the best judgment of the persons named in the proxies, with respect to any other matters that may properly come before the meeting and any adjournments or postponements.
Broker Non-Votes
Brokers, banks or other similar organizations holding shares in street name for customers who are beneficial owners of such shares are prohibited from voting such customers’ shares on non-routine matters in the absence of specific instructions from such customers. The absence of a specific instruction is commonly referred to as a “broker non-vote.” If your shares are held in “street name”, it is critical that you vote or provide specific instructions to your broker, bank or similar organization if you want your vote to count. The ratificationDirectors are: (01) Vikram A. Atal FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN (02) Danielle M. Brown FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN (03) Marjorie M. Connelly FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN (04) Steven D. Fredrickson FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN (05) Jayne-Anne Gadhia FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN (06) Glenn P. Marino FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 07) Geir L. Olsen FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN (08) Brett L. Paschke FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN (09) Scott M. Tabakin FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN (10) Peggy P. Turner FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN (11) Lance L. Weaver FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 2. Ratification of the selectionappointment of KPMGErnst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is consideredfor 2024. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 3. Approval, on a routine matter. Therefore, the organization that holds your shares may vote on this matter without instructions from you and no broker non-votes will occur with respect to this matter. On the other hand, the election of directors and the approvalnon-binding advisory basis, of the compensation on a non-binding basis, of the Company’s NEOs,named executive officers. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 4. Transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. Please sign exactly as name appears below. When shares are considered non-routine matters.held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If signing for a corporation or partnership, authorized person should sign full corporation or partnership name and indicate capacity in which they sign. Date: Signature (Title(s), if applicable) Signature (if held jointly) VIRTUAL CONTROL NUMBER PLEASE DETACH ALONG PERFORATED LINE AND MAIL IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED. VIRTUAL CONTROL NUMBER PROXY VOTING INSTRUCTIONS Please have your 11-digit control number ready when voting by internet or telephone INTERNET Vote your proxy on the internet by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 12, 2024: Go to www.AALvote.com/PRAA Have your proxy card available when you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other similar organization,access the organization may notabove website. Follow the prompts to vote your sharesshares. TELEPHONE Vote your proxy by phone by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on these non-routine matters absent specific instructions fromJune 12, 2024: Call 1 (866) 804-9616 Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card available when you usingcall. Follow the voting instructions form or Internet voting instructions that the institution provides to you. Absent specific instructions, the shares heldvote your shares. MAIL Vote your proxy by such organization are not counted as shares presentmail, which must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 12, 2024: Mark, sign, and entitled to be voted with respect to such non-routine matters. Therefore, broker non-votes will exist with respect to such non-routine matters but will have no impact on the outcome of such non-routine matters.
If you received more than onedate your proxy card, you may hold shares in more than one account. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, you must sign and return each card that you receive. Alternatively, if you vote online via the Internet or by telephone, you will need to vote once for each proxy card you receive. As a holder of common stock of the Company, you are always invited to attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares in person.
How to Vote
You are encouraged to submit your vote in advance of the meeting. You are entitled to cast one vote per share owned as of the Record Date for each proposal to be considered at the Annual Meeting. You may vote online, by telephone, by mail or in person at the Annual Meeting.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|55


Voting Instructions and Information

Voting By Mail
If you do not expect to attend the Annual Meeting in person, and choose to vote on the proposals on the agenda by mail, simply complete the proxy card, sign and datethen detach it, and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided. If you are a stockholder whose shares are held in “street name” (i.e., in the name of a broker, bank or other similar organization), you may obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the record holder. You may sign the proxy card and return it to the Company, or you may direct the record holder of your shares to vote your proxy in the manner you specify. Further, if your shares are held in street name, you must communicate your instructions respecting the voting of your shares to the record holder, or your broker will be prohibited from voting your shares. Voting by mail will not affect your right to vote in person if you decide to attend the Annual Meeting; however, if you wish to revoke your proxy, you must first notify the Corporate Secretary of your intent to vote in person, and must actually vote your shares at the Annual Meeting.

Voting and Viewing Proxy Materials via the Internet
Under rules approved by the SEC, the Company is furnishing proxy materials on the Internet in addition to mailing paper copies of the materials to each stockholder of record. Instructions on how to access and review the proxy materials on the Internet can be found on your proxy card and on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials which is sent to stockholders who hold their shares in “street name” (i.e. in the name of a broker, bank or other similar organization). Voting over the Internet will not affect your right to vote in person if you decide to attend the Annual Meeting; however, if you wish to revoke your proxy, you must first notify the Corporate Secretary of your intent to vote in person, and then vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. In addition, stockholders may request proxy materials be sent in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis. This process provides stockholders with needed information in a timely manner, while conserving natural resources and lowering the costs of printing and distributing proxy materials.
Voting Results
The results of voting at the Annual Meeting will be filed with the SEC via Form 8-K within four business days after the Annual Meeting and will be available on the SEC’s website www.sec.gov or on our website www.pragroup.com. If the final results are not available at that time, we will provide preliminary voting results in a Form 8-K and will provide the final voting results in an amendment to the Form 8-K as soon as they are available.
Board Recommendations
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE:
“FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES NAMED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT TO THE BOARD FOR THE COMING YEAR;
“FOR” THE APPROVAL, ON A NON-BINDING ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NEOs; AND
“FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|56


Communication with Directors

Stockholders may communicate with members of the Board by transmitting their correspondence by mail or email. All such communications should be sent to the attention of the Corporate Secretary, at the address specified below:
Judith S. Scott, Corporate Secretary and Counsel
PRA Group, Inc.
Building II
140 Corporate Boulevard
Norfolk, VA 23502
jsscott@pragroup.com
The Company's confidential toll-free fraud hotline may be used by any stockholder who prefers to raise a concern to the Board in a confidential or anonymous manner by dialing 1-855-874-2659. All communications to the Company’s confidential fraud hotline are referred to the Chairman of the Audit Committee, who is responsible for ensuring that such matters are appropriately investigated.
Communications received from stockholders to one or more directors will be collected and organized by the Corporate Secretary and forwarded to the Chairman of the Board, or if addressed to an identified independent director, to that director, as soon as practicable. Communications that are abusive, in bad taste or that present safety or security concerns may be handled differently. If multiple communications are received on a similar topic, the Corporate Secretary may forward only representative correspondence or summaries. The Company’s Corporate Secretary and Counsel will determine whether any communication addressed to the entire Board as a whole should be properly addressed by the entire Board, or by a committee of the Board. If a response to the communication is warranted, the content and method of the response will be coordinated with the Company's Corporate Secretary and Counsel.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|57


Submission of Stockholder Proposals

A stockholder proposal may be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials for the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act. As the rules of the SEC make clear, simply submitting a proposal does not guarantee its inclusion. Stockholders who wish to present proposals for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 must submit their proposals so that they are received at our principal executive offices no later than the close of business on December 15, 2016.
The Company’s By-Laws and Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provide that any stockholder of record entitled to vote at an annual meeting of stockholders who intends to make a nomination for director or make any other proposal must notify the Corporate Secretary in writing not less than 60 days and not more than 90 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders. As a result, any notice given by or on behalf of a stockholder pursuant to these provisions of the Company’s By-Laws must be received no earlier than February 12, 2017 and no later than March 14, 2017. Any nominations or other proposals submitted thereafter will be opposed as not having been timely filed. The notice must meet other requirements contained in the Company’s By-laws and Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, copies of which are available on the Investor Relations page on the Company’s website at www.pragroup.com. Copies of such documents can also be obtained, at no cost, from the Corporate Secretary at the address set forth herein, or from the SEC. The Company did not receive any recommendations from stockholders for consideration at the Annual Meeting or any notice of a stockholder’s intent to present a proposal at the Annual Meeting. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board does not intend to bring any other business before the Annual Meeting except items incident to the conduct of the Annual Meeting. The enclosed proxy card will confer discretionary authority with respect to matters which are not presently known to the Board at the time of the printing hereof and which may properly come before the Annual Meeting. It is the intention of the persons named on the proxy card to vote their proxy card with respect to such matters in accordance with their best judgment.
Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials
Under rules approved by the SEC, the Company is furnishing proxy materials on the Internet in addition to mailing paper copies of the materials to each stockholder of record. Stockholders may also view proxy materials and the Company’s 2015 Annual Report to Stockholders online at the Company’s website at www.pragroup.com. If you hold shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record, please refer to the information provided by that entity for instructions.
Annual Report on Form 10-K
A copy of this Proxy Statement, the Company's 2015 Annual Report to Stockholders, its audited consolidated financial statements, together with other related information, are available on the Internet and are being mailed to stockholders who requested printed versions. Additionally, these materials and the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC, and all financial statements or schedules required to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 13a-1 may be obtained from the Investor Relations page of our website at www.pragroup.com, or by request directed to the address below. A copy of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, and other periodic filings also may be obtained from the SEC's EDGAR database at www.sec.gov. Please direct all inquiries to the Investor Relations department at the following address:
PRA Group, Inc.
Attn: Investor Relations
120 Corporate Boulevard
Norfolk, VA 23502

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|58


Submission of Stockholder Proposals

Stockholder List
A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for examination by stockholders at the Annual Meeting.

This Proxy Statement is dated as of April 1, 2016. You should not assume that the information contained in this Proxy Statement is accurate as of any date other than the date of this Proxy Statement. The furnishing of this Proxy Statement to stockholders shall not create any implication to the contrary.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2016 Proxy Statement|59